Skip to main content

Sinoatrial Exit Block

  • Chapter
Clinical Cases in Cardiology

Abstract

The major electrocardiographic expressions of sinus node dysfunction (SND) are the presence of an abnormal sinus bradycardia and the occurrence of a “sinus pause.” A “sinus pause” is the occurrence on ECG of a sudden pause in the underlying sinus rhythm that can be due to the failure of the sinoatrial (SA) node to initiate (sinus arrest) or to conduct the impulse (sinus exit block). Sinoatrial exit block can be divided into three types: first, second, and third degrees. The second-degree exit block is further classified into type I (SA block with Wenckebach conduction) and type II (SA Mobitz II). SA block is included in a broader clinical scenario called “sick sinus syndrome” (SSS) that may consist in inappropriate sinus bradycardia, SA exit block or sinus arrest, prolonged sinus arrest with failing ectopic pacemaker, persistent atrial or atrioventricular escape rhythm, episodes of alternating supraventricular tachyarrhythmias with bradyarrhythmias, long pause following cardioversion of atrial tachyarrhythmia, or chronotropic incompetence. Symptoms are related to low cardiac output that occurs with brady- and/or tachyarrhythmias. The causes of SSS i nclude intrinsic and extrinsic factors. The cornerstone for the diagnosis of SSS is the correlation of end-organ perfusion symptoms with the occurrence of bradyarrhythmias. When an SSS is suspected, prolonged cardiac monitoring should be considered. Exercise testing, intracardiac electrophysiologic tests, and external or internal long-term devices are helpful in SSS diagnosis. There are no medications that reliably increase the heart rate in patients with bradyarrhythmias. Cardiac pacing therapy through an artificial pacemaker is the only choice, and an early identification of a potential reversible cause is always the first step of treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Surawicz B, Knilans TK (2008) Chou’s electrocardiography in clinical practice, 6th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schamroth L, Dove E (1966) The Wenckebach phenomenon in sino-atrial block. Br Heart J 28:350–358

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cabeen WR Jr, Roberts NK, Cbild JS (1978) Recognition of the Wenckebach phenomenon (clinical notes in diagnostic cardiology). West J Med 129:521–526

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Oreto G (1997) I disordini del ritmo cardiaco. 2nd edition. Torino: Centro Scientifico Editore

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rubenstein JJ et al (1972) Clinical spectrum of the sick sinus syndrome. Circulation 46(1):5–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Short DS (1954) The syndrome of alternating bradycardia and tachycardia. Br Heart J 16:208

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gomes JA, Kang PS, Matheson M et al (1981) Coexistence of sick sinus rhythm and atrial flutter-fibrillation. Circulation 63:80–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferrer MI (1968) The sick sinus syndrome in atrial disease. JAMA 206:645–646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Elvan A, Wylie K, Zipes DP (1996) Pacing-induced chronic atrial fibrillation impairs sinus node function in dogs. electrophysiological remodeling. Circulation 94(11):2953–2960

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sparks PB, Jayaprakash S, Vohra JK, Kalman JM (2000) Electrical remodeling of the atria associated with paroxysmal and chronic atrial flutter. Circulation 102(15):1807–1813

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mangrum JM, DiMarco JP (2000) The evaluation and management of bradycardia. N Engl J Med 342:703–709

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Corrado D, Pelliccia A, Heidbuchel H et al (2010) Section of Sports Cardiology, European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Recommendations for interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiogram in the athlete. Eur Heart J 31:243–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Northcote RJ, Canning GP, Ballantyne D (1989) Electrocardiographic findings in male veteran endurance athletes. Br Heart J 61:155–160

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wieling W, Thijs RD, van Dijk N et al (2009) Symptoms and signs of syncope: a review of the link between physiology and clinical clues. Brain 132

    Google Scholar 

  15. Menozzi C, Brignole M, Lolli G et al (1993) Follow-up of asystolic episodes in patients with cardioinhibitory, neurally mediated syncope and VVI pacemaker. Am J Cardiol 72:1152–1155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Adán V, Crown LA (2003) Diagnosis and treatment of sick sinus syndrome. Am Fam Physician 67:1725–1732

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jensen PN, Gronroos NN, Chen LY et al (2014) Incidence of and risk factors for sick sinus syndrome in the general population. J Am Coll Cardiol 64(6):531–538

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rodriguez RD, Schocken DD (1990) Update on sick sinus syndrome, a cardiac disorder of aging. Geriatrics 45:26–30

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Coma Samartin R, Sancho-Tello de Carranza MJ, Ruiz Mateas F et al (2011) Spanish pacemaker registry. Eighth official report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiac Pacing (2010). Rev Esp Cardiol 64:1154–1167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cunningham D, Charles R, Cunningham M, de Lange A (2010) Cardiac rhythm management: UK National Clinical Audit. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/nicor/audits/cardiacrhythmmanagement/publicreports/pdfs/Heartrhythm10

  21. Markewitz A (2010) The German Pacemaker Register. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol 21:248–255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Proclemer A, Ghidina M, Gregori D et al (2010) Trend of the main clinical characteristics and pacing modality in patients treated by pacemaker: data from the Italian Pacemaker Registry for the quinquennium 2003–07. Europace 12:202–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Swedish ICD and Pacemaker Register (2010) Annual statistical report 2010. www.pacemakerregistret.se

  24. Tuppin P, Neumann A, Marijon E et al (2011) Implantation and patient profiles for pacemakers and cardioverter defibrillators in France (2008–2009). Arch Cardiovasc Dis 104

    Google Scholar 

  25. Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G et al (2013) Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the task force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Eur Heart J 34:2281–2329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Alboni P, Menozzi C, Brignole M et al (1997) Effects of permanent pacemaker and oral theophylline in sick sinus syndrome the THEOPACE study: a randomized controlled trial. Circulation 96(1):260–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shaw DB, Holman RR, Gowers JI (1980) Survival in sinoatrial disorder (sick-sinus syndrome). Br Med J 280:139–141

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sutton R, Kenny RA (1986) The natural history of sick sinus syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 9:1110–1114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nielsen JC, Thomsen PE, Hojberg S et al (2011) A comparison of single-lead atrial pacing with dual-chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome. Eur Heart J 32:686–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Andersen HR, Thuesen L, Bagger JP et al (1994) Prospective randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet 344:1523–1528

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Castelnuovo E, Stein K, Pitt M et al (2005) The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dual-chamber pacemakers compared with single-chamber pacemakers for bradycardia due to atrioventricular block or sick sinus syndrome: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 9:iii, xi–xiii, 1–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Nielsen JC, Kristensen L, Andersen HR et al (2003) A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome: echocardiographic and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 42:614–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorena Scappini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Romandini, A., Scappini, L. (2015). Sinoatrial Exit Block. In: Capucci, A. (eds) Clinical Cases in Cardiology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19926-9_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19926-9_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19925-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19926-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics