Skip to main content

Evaluation of Software Mediated Process Assessments for IT Service Management

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination (SPICE 2015)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 526))

Abstract

IT service organisations are cognisant that continual service improvement can be achieved by conducting regular process assessments. However, such assessments are expensive and so we have developed a Decision Support System (DSS) tool which uses the international standard for process assessment ISO/IEC 15504 to offer a transparent and efficient approach. This paper provides evidence of evaluation of this software-mediated process assessment (SMPA) approach which was based on ISO/IEC 15504, ISO/IEC 20000 and the IT Infrastructure Library (ITILĀ®). In a usability evaluation of the online tool, participants reported largely positive experiences finding the online survey easy to use trustworthy, comfortable, generally effective, and more transparent and less costly to implement than a manual assessment. However, to engage in process improvement, human judgment, and possibly expert assessment facilitators are necessary for assessment validation and improvement, that is, a fully automated online survey that is strictly standard-based is not very useful. Further clarification of the survey questions with relevant examples, clearer answer options and having more visible goal statements on every question page were suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barafort, B., Betry, V., Cortina, S., Picard, M., St-Jean, M., Renault, A., ValdĆØs, O.: ITSM Process Assessment Supporting ITIL. Public Research Centre Henri Tudor (ed.) Zaltbommel, Netherlands. Van Haren Publishing (2009)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Bernard, P.: Foundations of ITIL, Chittenden, J. (ed.) Zaltbommel, Netherlands. Van Haren Publishing (2012)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Lloyd, V.: ITIL Continual Service Improvement. The Stationery Office, London, UK (2011)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  4. ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC 15504-2:2004 ā€“ Information Technology ā€“ Process Assessment ā€“ Part 2: Performing an Assessment. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland (2004)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Mesquida, A.L., Mas, A., Amengual, E., Calvo-Manzano, J.A.: IT Service Management Process Improvement based on ISO/IEC 15504: A Systematic Review. Information and Software Technology 54(3), 239ā€“247 (2012)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC TS 15504-8:2012 - Information Technology - Process Assessment - Part 8: An Exemplar Process Assessment Model for IT Service Management. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland (2012)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Shrestha, A., Cater-Steel, A., Toleman, M., Rout, T.: towards transparent and efficient process assessments for IT service Management. In: Mitasiunas, A., Rout, T., Oā€™Connor, R.V., Dorling, A. (eds.) SPICE 2014. CCIS, vol. 477, pp. 165ā€“176. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  8. CMMI, Standard CMMIĀ® Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPISM) A, Version 1.3: Method Definition Document. Software Engineering Institute: Carnegie Mellon University, MA, USA (2011)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  9. MacDonald, I.: ITIL Process Assessment Framework. The Co-operative Financial Services: Manchester, UK (2010)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Deutskens, E., de Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M.: An Assessment of Equivalence Between Online and Mail Surveys in Service Research. Journal of Service Research 8(4), 346ā€“355 (2006)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L.: A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and its Implications for Future Research. Journal of Marketing 49(4), 41ā€“50 (1985)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  12. Lepmets, M., Cater-Steel, A., Gacenga, F., Ras, E.: Extending the IT Service Quality Measurement Framework through a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Service Science Research 4(1), 7ā€“47 (2012)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  13. Jia, R., Reich, B.H.: IT Service Climateā€”An Essential Managerial Tool to Improve Client Satisfaction with IT Service Quality. Information Systems Management 28(2), 174ā€“179 (2011)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Spath, D., Bauer, W., Praeg, C.-P.: IT Service Quality Management: Assumptions, Frameworks and Effects on Business Performance. In: Quality Management for IT Services-Perspectives on Business and Process Performance. IGI Global, PA, pp. 1ā€“21 (2011)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  15. Edgeman, R.L., Bigio, D., Ferleman, T.: Six Sigma and Business Excellence: Strategic and Tactical Examination of IT Service Level Management at the Office of the Chief Technology Officer of Washington, DC. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 21(3), 257ā€“273 (2005)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  16. Barafort, B., Di Renzo, B., Merlan, O.: Benefits resulting from the combined use of ISO/IEC 15504 with the information technology infrastructure library (ITIL). In: Oivo, M., Komi-Sirviƶ, M. (eds.) 4th International Conference on Product Focussed Software Development and Process Improvement (PROFES). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2559, pp. 314ā€“325. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  17. Checkland, P., Scholes, J.: Soft Systems Methodology in Practice, 1st edn. J Wiley, Chichester (1990)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  18. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75ā€“106 (2004)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  19. Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The Anatomy of a Design Theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8(5), 312ā€“335 (2007)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  20. Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: The Design Theory Nexus. MIS Quarterly 32(4), 731ā€“755 (2008)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  21. Sein, M.K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., Lindgren, R.: Action Design Research. MIS Quarterly 35(1), 37ā€“56 (2011)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  22. Iivari, J.: A Paradigmatic Analysis of Information Systems As a Design Science. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 19(2) Article 5 (2007)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  23. Walls, J.G., Widmeyer, G.R., El Sawy, O.A.: Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research 3(1), 36ā€“59 (1992)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  24. Van Aken, J.E.: The Nature of Organizing Design: Both Like and Unlike Material Object Design. Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies (ECIS) (2006)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  25. Carlsson, S.A., Henningsson, S., Hrastinski, S., Keller, C.: Socio-technical IS Design Science Research: Developing Design Theory for IS Integration Management. Information Systems and e-Business Management 9(1), 109ā€“131 (2011)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  26. Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: A comprehensive framework for evaluation in design science research. In: Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Kuechler, B. (eds.) DESRIST 2012. LNCS, vol. 7286, pp. 423ā€“438. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  27. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24(3), 45ā€“77 (2007)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  28. Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R., Venable, J.R.: Strategies for Design Science Research Evaluation. In: 16th European Conference on Information Systems. Galway, Ireland (2008)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  29. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24(3), 45ā€“77 (2008)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  30. ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC 25010:2011 ā€“ Systems and software engineering ā€“ Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) - System and software quality models. International Organisation for Standardisation: Geneva, Switzerland (2011)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  31. TRC, TRC Annual Report 2012/13. Toowoomba Regional Council: Toowoomba (2013)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  32. ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC 33001:2015 ā€“ Information technology ā€“ Process assessment ā€“ Concepts and terminology. International Organisation for Standardisation: Geneva, Switzerland (2015)

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aileen Cater-Steel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Shrestha, A., Cater-Steel, A., Toleman, M., Rout, T. (2015). Evaluation of Software Mediated Process Assessments for IT Service Management. In: Rout, T., Oā€™Connor, R., Dorling, A. (eds) Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. SPICE 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 526. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19860-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19860-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19859-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19860-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics