Skip to main content

Methodology for ADAS Validation: Potential Contribution of Other Scientific Fields Which Have Already Answered the Same Questions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 2132 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mobility ((LNMOB))

Abstract

Since the 80s, the building of learn and test data bases for learning-based systems (i.e. neural networks) had to cope with problems of picking representative examples and measuring the generalization/the score of the system. And of course, real open world applications cannot be fully tested. It seems that artificial vision-based ADAS now discover the same question, and then, may use the same solutions, involving the same methodology (A.G.E.N.D.A.), using design of experiments and data analysis tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ADAS:

Advanced Driver Assistance Systems

s/n ratio:

signal/noise ratio

References

  1. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois, Urbana III

    Google Scholar 

  2. Peirce CS (1877–1878) Illustrations of the logic of science (series), popular science monthly, vols 12–13. Relevant individual papers: (1878 March), “the doctrine of chances”, popular science monthly, v. 12, March issue, pp 604–615. Internet Archive Eprint

    Google Scholar 

  3. “Un cadre méthodologique dédié à la conception de solutions neuronales : la méthode AGENDA”, G. Yahiaoui, Colloque les réseaux neuromimétiques et leurs applications, Neuronîmes92, Nîmes, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  4. Box GE, Hunter JS, Hunter WG (2005) Statistics for experimenters: design, innovation, and discovery, 2nd edn. Wiley. ISBN 0-471-71813-0

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yates F (1934) Contingency table involving small numbers and the χ2 test. Suppl J Roy Stat Soc 1(2):217–235. JSTOR 2983604

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bowley AL (1901) Elements of statistics, londres, king and son, 2e éd. 1902, p 335; 4e éd. 1920, p 454; trad. française sur la 5e éd. par L. Suret et G. Lutfalla, 1929

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aldrich J (2006) Eigenvalue, eigenfunction, eigenvector, and related terms. In: Jeff M (ed) Earliest known uses of some of the words of mathematics, retrieved 2006-08-22

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Yahiaoui .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yahiaoui, G., Da Silva Dias, P. (2016). Methodology for ADAS Validation: Potential Contribution of Other Scientific Fields Which Have Already Answered the Same Questions. In: Langheim, J. (eds) Energy Consumption and Autonomous Driving. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19818-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19818-7_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19817-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19818-7

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics