Skip to main content

The Question Concerning Curriculum

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 888 Accesses

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Education ((BRIEFSKEY))

Abstract

Heidegger’s philosophy and direct contributions to educational thought do not make it easy to envisage a form of curriculum that can promote openness to Being. Much debate goes on about curriculum already. There are arguments that curriculum should be about appreciating the achievements of human culture, or about preparing for the demands of life in the modern world, or about the meaning that learners make of experience—or some combination of these. This chapter considers these three curriculum orientations from the perspective of Heidegger’s philosophy. His critiques of the Tradition and humanism undermine the idea that curriculum should be about appreciating culture. His critique of the instrumental mindset challenges the idea that curriculum should focus on the demands of modern living. That curriculum should be a matter of developing the learner and that the learner’s experience is itself a form of curriculum appears to be more consistent with Heidegger’s thinking. However, it is argued that although a curriculum oriented to awakening the sense of Being has a similar starting point to a curriculum oriented to the learner’s experience, it takes a different direction: into the disclosure of Being itself. The chapter goes on to describe a vision of an ontological curriculum that goes some way toward answering the question of what a curriculum could be like from the perspective of Heidegger’s philosophy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bernstein, B. (2000), Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique (rev. ed.). Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnett, M. (1995). Teaching thinking, and the sanctity of content. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 29(3), 295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnett, M. (2002). Education as a form of the poetic: A Heideggerian approach to learning and the teacher—pupil relationship. In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Heidegger, education, and modernity. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, L., & Kennedy, K. J. (2013). Curriculum construction (5th ed.). Melbourne, VIC: Pearson Education Australia, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doll, W. E. (2002). Ghosts of the curriculum. In W. E. Doll & N. Gough (Eds.), Curriculum visions. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, K. (2007). The educated mind: How cognitive tools shape our understanding. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. (1985). The conditions of learning (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, H. (2000). Heidegger on poetry and thinking: Some educational implications, Παιδεία Contemporary Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D. (1990). Curriculum history. Geelong, VIC: Deakin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1949). Existence and being. Chicago, IL: Henry Regnery Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time (trans. Macquarrie and Robinson), Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell Publisher Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1968). What is called thinking? New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays. New York: Harper Torch books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1993). The self-assertion of the German University (1933). In R. Wolin (Ed.), The heidegger controversy. A critical reader. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1998). Pathmarks. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (2002). Heidegger on the art of teaching (trans. & ed. Allen & Axiotis). In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Heidegger, education, and modernity. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (2010). Being and time (trans. Stambaugh, rev. Schmidt). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, S. (2007). The origins of competency-based training. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 47(2), 179–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, S. (2009). The return of the gods: Heidegger and mythopoetic curriculum theory. In P. Willis, T. Leonard, A. Morrison, & S. Hodge (Eds.), Spirituality, mythopoesis and learning. Flaxton, QLD: Post Pressed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huebner, D. (1967). Curriculum as concern for man’s temporality. Theory into Practice, 6(4), 172–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, J. B. (1995). In B. Macdonald (Ed.), Theory as a prayerful act. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, C. J. (2007). Key concepts for understanding curriculum (4th ed.). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. A. (Ed.). (2002). Heidegger, education, and modernity. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, W. (1975a), Currere: Toward reconceptualisation. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum theorizing. The reconceptualists. Berkeley: McCutchan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, W. (1975b). The reconceptualisation of curriculum studies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 10(3), 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, W., & Grummett, M. R. (1976). Toward a poor curriculum. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, W., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, W. H. (1985). Curriculum: Perspective, paradigm, and possibility. London: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanos, W. (1993). The end of education: Toward posthumanism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, I. D. (2002). Heidegger on ontological education, or how we become what we are. In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Heidegger, education, and modernity. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, I. D. (2005). Heidegger on ontotheology. Technology and the politics of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Hodge .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hodge, S. (2015). The Question Concerning Curriculum. In: Martin Heidegger. SpringerBriefs in Education(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19806-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics