Skip to main content

Preventive Maintenance, Concepts, Modeling, and Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Planning and Control of Maintenance Systems

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to present elements of planned and preventive maintenance concepts and models. Preventive maintenance concepts are presented, followed by a host of diagnostic techniques which are useful for implementing condition-based maintenance programs. Then, this chapter presents a host of mathematical models for optimal preventive maintenance and replacement, followed by mathematical models for inspections. The inspections models aid in determining frequency of inspections that are useful for planning effective maintenance actions. In addition, the chapter presents the concepts of imperfect maintenance and delay time modeling. Several examples are provided to illustrate the concepts and the models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baker RD, Christer AH (1994) Review of delay-time OR modeling of engineering aspects of maintenance. Euro J Oper Res 73:407–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Banerjee PK, Ni C (1996) Inspection for repairable systems. IEE 28(3):1003–1010

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barlow RE, Hunter LC (1960) Optimum maintenance policies. Oper Res 8:90–100

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bazaraa M, Shetty CM, Sherali H (1993) Nonlinear programming theory and algorithms, 2nd edn. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ben Daya M, Duffuaa SO (1997) Co-ordination of inspections for a group of machines. J Qual Maintenance Eng (JQME) 3(3):199–208

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christer AH, Walker WM (1984) Delay time models for industrial inspection maintenance problem. J Oper Res Soc 35(5):401–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Christer AH, Wang W (1992) A model of condition monitoring of a production plant. Int J Prod Res 30(9):2199–2211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Christer AH, Wang W, Sharp JM, Baker RD (1997) Stochastic maintenance modeling of high-tech steel production plant. In: Christer A, Osaki S, Thomas LC (eds) stocastic modeling in innovative manufacturing, Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hariga MA A maintenance inspection model for a single machine with general failure distribution. Microelectronics and Reliability, to appear

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jardine AKS (1973) Maintenance, replacement and reliability. Pitman Publishing House, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Malik MAK (1979) Reliable preventive maintenance scheduling. AIIE Trans 11:221–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nagakawa T (1979) Optimal policies when preventive maintenance is imperfect. IEEE Trans Reliab R-28:331–332

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nagakawa T (1980) A summary of imperfect preventive maintenance policies with minimal repair. Res Oper/Oper Res 14(3):249–255

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nguyen DG, Murthy DNP (1984) Optimal preventive policies for repairable systems. Oper Res 30:1181–1194

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Olorunniwo FO, Izuchukwu A (1991) Scheduling imperfect preventive and overhaul maintenance. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 8(4):67–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salih O. Duffuaa .

Exercises

Exercises

  1. 1.

    Why is preventive maintenance in general is more effective than other types of maintenance strategies?

  2. 2.

    Visit a plant near your area and identify the need for CBM. List the diagnostic techniques the plant needs. Identify the type of monitoring and equipment needed to make the CBM operational.

  3. 3.

    What are the cost components involved in the equipment life cycle? How do you estimate each component?

  4. 4.

    Visit a nearby plant and select a critical equipment and design a planned maintenance program for it.

  5. 5.

    An equipment time to failure follows an exponential distribution with mean equal 500 days. The cost of preventive and failure maintenance are $50 and $300, respectively. Determine t p the optimal time for preventive replacement using the following policies:

    1. (a)

      Type I policy.

    2. (b)

      Type II policy .

  6. 6.

    Solve the same problem in 7 if the failure distribution is lognormal with scale parameter μ = 2 and shape parameter σ 2 = 0.01.

  7. 7.

    Solve the optimal t p in example 2 using the golden section method.

  8. 8.

    Determine the optimal t p for the problems in example 1 and 2 using Newton method .

  9. 9.

    If an equipment has a failure time distribution F(t) and density function f(t), show the following:

    1. (a)

      \(\mu = \int_{0}^{\infty } {\overline{F} (t){\text{d}}t}\)

    2. (b)

      \(r(t) = {\raise0.7ex\hbox{${f(t)}$} \!\mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{f(t)} {1 - F(t)}}}\right.\kern-0pt} \!\lower0.7ex\hbox{${1 - F(t)}$}}\).

    3. (c)

      The expected number H(t p) of failures in the interval (0, t p) is \(H(t_{\text{p}} ) = \int_{0}^{{t_{\text{p}} }} {r(t){\text{d}}t}\)

  10. 10.

    Develop an optimization method to find the optimal k, T 1, …, T k for the generalized type I and type II policies in Sect. 3.6.4.

  11. 11.

    Consider the inspection model in Sect. 3.8.2 and show that a breakeven inspection interval exists for any failure distribution. Show that the breakeven point is unique in the cases of the exponential and Weibull distributions (results are in [9]).

  12. 12.

    Consider the model in Sect. 3.8.2 and derive the optimal inspection schedule for the exponential distribution with a parameter λ in terms of p, C r, C I, and λ. Find the schedule if λ = 0.01, p = 500, C r = 4000, and C i  = 50.

  13. 13.

    Consider the model in Sect. 3.8.3 and show that if the failure rate distribution is exponential, then the inspections are equally spaced, i.e., T i+1 −T i  = T i  − T i−1.

  14. 14.

    Use the model given in Sect. 2.8.4 for coordinating the inspections of five machines. The data for the machines are given below.

    Machine i

    $C i

    λ i

    $r i

    $s i

    1

    5

    0.01

    100

    10

    2

    10

    0.05

    200

    100

    3

    5

    0.08

    100

    10

    4

    5

    0.02

    300

    100

    5

    10

    0.1

    200

    50

    A = 25, N = 5 (Data source is reference [3])

  15. 15.

    Suppose the failure distribution for an equipment is Weibull with shape parameter α = 2 and scale parameter β = 50. Then, show the following:

    1. (a)

      The failure rate function is given by, \(r(t) = \beta \alpha \, t^{\alpha - 1}\)

    2. (b)

      Show that r(t) is monotonically increasing.

    3. (c)

      Compute T* for the models given for approaches 1 and 3 for modeling imperfect maintenance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Duffuaa, S.O., Raouf, A. (2015). Preventive Maintenance, Concepts, Modeling, and Analysis. In: Planning and Control of Maintenance Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19803-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19803-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19802-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19803-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics