Skip to main content

Economic Demand Functions in Simulation: Agent-Based Vs. Monte Carlo Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 38))

  • 1205 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to compare an agent-based and Monte Carlo simulation of microeconomic demand functions. Marshallian demand function and Cobb-Douglas utility function are used in simulation experiments. The overall idea is to use these function as a core element in a seller-to-customer price negotiation in a trading company. Furthermore, formal model of negotiation is proposed and implemented to support the trading processes. The paper firstly presents some of the principles of agent-based and Monte Carlo simulation techniques, and demand function theory. Secondly, we present a formal model of demand functions negotiations. Lastly, we depict some of the simulation results in trading processes throughout one year of selling commodities to the consumers. The results obtained show that agent-based method is more suitable than Monte Carlo, and the demand functions could be used to predict the trading results of a company in some metrics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In microeconomics, the utility maximization problem is a problem, which consumers face: "How should I spend my money in order to maximize my utility?" It is a type of optimal decision problem.

  2. 2.

    The wealth effect is an economic term, referring to an increase (decrease) in spending that accompanies an increase (decrease) in perceived wealth.

  3. 3.

    Ratio of the same utility, consuming the commodities – Cobb-Douglas utility function.

References

  1. Szarowská, I.: Effects of taxation by economic functions on economic growth in the European Union. In: Jircikova, E., Knapkova, A., Pastuszkova, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 6th International Scientific Conference: Finance and the performance of Firms in Science, Education and Practice Zlin, pp. 746–758. Tomas Bata University, Czech Republic (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gajdova, K., Cieslarova, G.: Changes in selected characteristics of the EU labour market in times of economic crisis. Conference: In: Proceedings of the19th International-Business-Information-Management-Association Conference. Barcelona, Spain, 2011. Innovation Vision 2020: Sustainable Growth, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Development, pp. 628–635 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Janáková, M.: Challenges of information technologies in the global information society. In: Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Economic Policy in the European Union Member Countries, pp. 90–100. Silesian University in Opava, Karviná, Czech Republic (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Suchánek, P.: Business intelligence - the standard tool of a modern company. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Scientific Symposium on Business Administration: Global Economic Crisis and Changes: Restructuring Business System: Strategic Perspectives for Local, National and Global Actors, pp. 123–132. Karviná, Czech Republic (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Šperka, R., Spišák, M.: Microeconomic demand functions implementation in java experiments. In: Proceedings Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Volume 296, Agent and Multi-Agent Systems. Technologies and Applications. In: 8th KES International Conference, KES AMSTA 2014, Chania, Greece, pp. 183–192. Springer International Publishing, Berlin (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Šperka, R.: Application of a simulation framework for decision support systems. Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg, Hoehere Bundeslehranstalt und Bundesamt fuer Wein- und Obstbau, vol. 64, Issue 1. Klosterneuburg, Austria (2014). ISSN 0007-5922

    Google Scholar 

  7. Šperka, R., Vymětal, D., Spišák, M.: Towards the validation of agent-based BPM simulation. In: Proceedings Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. 7th International Conference KES-AMSTA`13, Hue city, Vietnam, vol. 252, pp. 276–283. IOS Press BV, Amsterdam (2013). ISBN 978-1-61499-253-0 (print)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Šperka, R., Spišák, M., Slaninová, K., Martinovič, J., Dráždilová, P.: Control loop model of virtual company in BPM simulation. In: Proceedings Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 188, pp. 515–524. Springer, Berlin (2013). ISSN 2194-5357

    Google Scholar 

  9. Šperka, R., Spišák, M.: Transaction costs influence on the stability of financial market: agent-based simulation. Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis, London, vol. 14, supplement 1, pp. S1–S12 (2013). doi:10.3846/16111699.2012.701227. ISSN 1611-1699

  10. Šperka, R., Vymětal, D.: MAREA - an education application for trading company simulation based on REA Principles. In: Proceedings Advances in Education Research. Information, Communication and Education Application, vol. 30, pp. 140–147. USA (2013). ISBN 978-1-61275-056-9

    Google Scholar 

  11. Barnett, M.: Modeling and simulation in business process management’, Gensym Corporation, pp. 6–7. http://news.bptrends.com/publicationfiles/1103%20WP%20Mod%20Simulation%20of%20BPM%20-%20Barnett-1.pdf (2003). Accessed 16 Jan 2012

  12. Tay, N., Lusch, R.: Agent-based modeling of ambidextrous organizations: virtualizing competitive strategy. IEEE Trans. Intell. Syst. 22(5), 50–57 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilkinson, I., Young, L.: On cooperating: firms, relations, networks. J. Bus. Res. 55, 123–132 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Casti, J.: Would-be Worlds. How Simulation is Changing the World of Science. Wiley, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goldenberg, J., Libai, B., Muller, E.: The chilling effect of network externalities. Int. J. Res. Mark. 27(1), 4–15 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Heath, B., Hill, R., Ciarallo, F.: A survey of agent-based modeling practices. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 12(4), 5–32 (2009). (January 1998 to July 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rahmandad, H., Sterman, J.: Heterogeneity and network structure in the dynamics of diffusion: comparing agent-based and differential equation models. Manage. Sci. 54(5), 998–1014 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shaikh, N., Ragaswamy, A., Balakrishnan A.: Modelling the Diffusion of Innovations Using Small World Networks Working Paper. Penn State University. Philadelphia (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Toubia, O., Goldenberg, J., Garcia, R.: A New approach to modeling the adoption of new products: aggregated diffusion models. MSI reports: Working Papers Series, vol. 8, issue 1, pp. 65–76 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Adjali, I., Dias, B., Hurling R.: Agent based modeling of consumer behavior. In: Proceedings of the North American Association for Computational Social and Organizational Science Annual Conference. University of Notre Dame. Notre Dame (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ben, L., Bouron, T., Drogoul, A.: Agent-based interaction analysis of consumer behavior. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: Part 1. ACM, New York, pp. 184–190 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marshall, A.: Principle of Economics, 8th edn. MacMillan, London (1920)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M., Green, J.: Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995). ISBN 0-19-507340-1

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pollak, R.: Conditional demand functions and consumption theory. Quart. J. Econ. 83, 60–78 (1969)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Varian, H.R.: Microeconomic Analysis, 3rd edn., Chapters 7, 8 and 9. W.W. Norton & Company, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This paper was supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports Czech Republic within the Institutional Support for Long-term Development of a Research Organization in 2015.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roman Šperka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Šperka, R. (2015). Economic Demand Functions in Simulation: Agent-Based Vs. Monte Carlo Approach. In: Jezic, G., Howlett, R., Jain, L. (eds) Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19728-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19728-9_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19727-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19728-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics