Skip to main content
  • 386 Accesses

Abstract

The aspiration to ensure access to human DNA without exploitation of research communities being a central theme of the book, this chapter explores meanings of the word exploitation from its everyday usage to its various interpretations as a philosophical concept. The most significant contributions from the literature are traversed, such as advantageous use of someone, or interaction stained by wrong, or gaining advantage at the expense of another. Legal approaches to exploitation are introduced, with substantive and procedural fairness as themes that are revisited throughout the book. Likewise, non-legal approaches are introduced such as Wertheimer’s taking unfair advantage, focus on consent as an indicator of fairness, and the Principle of Permissable Exploitation. Finally Mayer’s three forms of exploitation are chosen as providing clear guidance for the questions being examined. The three forms are firstly where exploiters do not benefit their victims at all (the free rider), secondly where they do not benefit them sufficiently (an unfair exchange), and thirdly where they do not benefit them authentically (an illegal or highly immoral transaction, e.g. the provision of heroin at reasonable prices). The chapter closes by explaining how Mayer’s last two classes will be used as yardsticks in subjecting the exchange of human DNA to scrutiny.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    [Online] Available at http://www.macmillandictionary.com.

  2. 2.

    Carse and Little (2008) refer to marketplace norms, which denote a transaction as morally permissible as long as both parties are competent, fully informed and sufficiently instrumentally rational, and there is no deception, fraud, manipulation, threat, coercion or force.

References

  • Arnason, G., & van Niekerk, A. (2006). Undue fear of inducements in research in developing countries. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 18(2), 122–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigwood, R. (2003). Exploitative contracts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, H. (2001). The other side of eden: Hunter-gatherers, farmers, and the shaping of the world. Canada: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A. (1979). Exploitation, alienation and injustice. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 9, 138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carling, A. (1998). Exploitation. In Encyclopedia of applied ethics (Vol. 2). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carse, A. L., & Little, M. O. (2008). Exploitation and the Enterprise of Medical Research. In J. S. Hawkins & E. J. Emanuel (Eds.), Exploitation and developing countries: The ethics of clinical research (pp. 206–245). Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, C. (1978). Right and wrong. MA, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guevara, C (1964). Speech delivered on March 25, 1964 at the plenary session of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) [Online] Available in http://www.rcgfrfi.easynet.co.uk/ww/guevara/.

  • Hawkins, J., & Emanuel, E. J. (2008). Exploitation and developing countries: The ethics of clinical research. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, C. (2007). Taking as giving: Bioscience, exchange, and the politics of benefit sharing. Social Studies of Science, 37, 729–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macklin, R. (2004). Double standards in medical research in developing countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. (2007). What’s wrong with exploitation? Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. (1995). What’s wrong with exploitation? Noûs, 29, 159–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skloot, R. (2010). The immortal life of henrietta lacks. New York: Crown Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, A. (1996). Exploitation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, A. (2008). Exploitation in Clinical Research. In J. S. Hawkins & E. J. Emanuel (Eds.), Exploitation and developing countries (pp. 63–104). Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A. (1995). Exploitation. Social Philosophy and Policy, 12, 150–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger Scarlin Chennells .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chennells, R.S. (2016). Exploitation. In: Equitable Access to Human Biological Resources in Developing Countries. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19725-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19725-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19724-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19725-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics