Skip to main content

On the Difficult Tradeoff Between Security and Privacy: Challenges for the Management of Digital Identities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
International Joint Conference (CISIS 2015)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 369))

Abstract

The deployment of security measures can lead in many occasions to an infringement of users’ privacy. Indeed, nowadays we have many examples about surveillance programs or personal data breaches in online service providers. In order to avoid the latter problem, we need to establish security measures that do not involve a violation of privacy rights. In this communication we discuss the main challenges when conciliating information security and users’ privacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A recent example of privacy enhancing technologies being questioned by a government is that of Cameron in the UK who, after the attack on Charlie Hebdo in Paris, stated: “are we going to allow a means of communications where it simply is not possible to do that [listen in on communications]?” http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jan/15/david-cameron-encryption-anti-terror-laws.

  2. 2.

    See, for instance, the call made by Tor: https://blog.torproject.org/blog/call-arms-helping-internet-services-accept-anonymous-users.

References

  1. EU Cybersecurity plan to protect open internet and online freedom and opportunity—cyber security strategy and proposal for a directive. http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/eu-cybersecurity-plan-protect-open-internet-and-online-freedom-and-opportunity-cyber-security (February 2013). http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/eu-cybersecurity-plan-protect-open-internet-and-online-freedom-and-opportunity-cyber-security

  2. Aaber, Z.S., Crowder, R.M., Fadhel, N.F., Wills, G.B.: Preventing document leakage through active document. In: 2014 World Congress on Internet Security (WorldCIS), pp. 53–58 (Dec 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Backes, M., Gerling, S., Lorenz, S., Lukas, S.: X-pire 2.0: A user-controlled expiration date and copy protection mechanism. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1633–1640. SAC ’14, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2014). doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2554850.2554856

  4. Backes, M., Maffei, M., Pecina, K.: Automated synthesis of privacy-preserving distributed applications. In: Proceedings of ISOC NDSS (2012). http://www.lbs.cs.uni-saarland.de/publications/asosda-long.pdf

  5. Balsa, E., Brandimarte, L., Acquisti, A., Diaz, C., Gurses, S.: Spiny CACTOS: OSN users attitudes and perceptions towards cryptographic access control tools. In: Proceedings 2014 Workshop on Usable Security (2014). https://www.internetsociety.org/doc/spiny-cactos-osn-users-attitudes-and-perceptions-towards-cryptographic-access-control-tools

  6. Benjumea, V., Choi, S.G., Lopez, J., Yung, M.: Anonymity 2.0 - X.509 extensions supporting privacy-friendly authentication. In: Proceedings of Cryptology and Network Security, 6th International Conference, CANS 2007, pp. 265–281. Singapore, 8–10 Dec 2007. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-76969-9_17

  7. Bertino, E., Ghinita, G., Kantarcioglu, M., Nguyen, D., Park, J., Sandhu, R., Sultana, S., Thuraisingham, B., Xu, S.: A roadmap for privacy-enhanced secure data provenance. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 43(3), 481–501 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boyd, C.: Digital multisignatures. In: Cryptography Coding, pp. 241–246 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Camenisch, J.: Efficient anonymous fingerprinting with group signatures. In: Advances in Cryptology-ASIACRYPT 2000, pp. 415–428. Springer (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chaum, D., van Heyst, E.: Group signatures. In: Proceedings of Advances in Cryptology—EUROCRYPT’91, Workshop on the Theory and Application of of Cryptographic Techniques, pp. 257–265. Brighton, UK, 8–11 April 1991. doi:10.1007/3-540-46416-6_22

  11. Chow, S.S., Yiu, S.M., Hui, L.C.: Efficient identity based ring signature. In: Applied Cryptography and Network Security. pp. 499–512. Springer (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Damgård, I., Pastro, V., Smart, N., Zakarias, S.: Multiparty computation from somewhat homomorphic encryption. In: Advances in Cryptology-CRYPTO 2012, pp. 643–662. Springer (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Díaz, C., Tene, O., Gürses, S.: Hero or villain: the data controller in privacy law and technologies. Ohio State Law J. 74 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Diaz, J., Arroyo, D., Rodriguez, F.B.: A formal methodology for integral security design and verification of network protocols. J. Syst. Softw. Accepted (In Press). doi:10.1016/j.jss.2013.09.020

  15. Diaz, J., Arroyo, D., Rodriguez, F.B.: Fair anonymity for the Tor network. CoRR abs/1412.4707 (2014), http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.4707

  16. Diaz, J., Arroyo, D., Rodriguez, F.B.: New x.509-based mechanisms for fair anonymity management. Comput. Secur. 46, 111–125 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.cose.2014.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fakhoury, H.M.: Technology and privacy can co-exist. The New York Times (12 Dec 2012). http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/12/11/privacy-and-the-apps-you-download/privacy-and-technology-can-and-should-co-exist

  18. Gentry, C.: A fully homomorphic encryption scheme. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gurses, S., Troncoso, C., Diaz, C.: Engineering privacy by design. Comput. Priv. Data Prot. 317, 1178–1179. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17761870

  20. He, W., Akhawe, D., Jain, S., Shi, E., Song, D.: Shadowcrypt: Encrypted web applications for everyone. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 1028–1039. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Henry, R., Henry, K., Goldberg, I.: Making a nymbler nymble using verbs. In: Privacy Enhancing Technologies, pp. 111–129 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson, P.C., Kapadia, A., Tsang, P.P., Smith, S.W.: Nymble: anonymous ip-address blocking. In: Privacy Enhancing Technologies, pp. 113–133 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Juels, A., Kaliski Jr, B.S.: Pors: Proofs of retrievability for large files. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM conference on Computer and communications security, pp. 584–597. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Li, S., Sadeghi, A.R., Heisrath, S., Schmitz, R., Ahmad, J.: hpin/htan: a lightweight and low-cost e-banking solution against untrusted computers. In: Danezis, G. (ed.) Financial Cryptography and Data Security, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7035, pp. 235–249. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27576-0_19

  25. Long, J., Skoudis, E., Eijkelenborg, A.V.: Google Hacking for Penetration Testers. Syngress Publishing, San Francisco (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. OECD: The E-Government imperative (Complete Edition—ISBN 9264101179), E-Government Studies, vol. 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Popa, R.A., Stark, E., Valdez, S., Helfer, J., Zeldovich, N., Balakrishnan, H.: Building web applications on top of encrypted data using mylar. In: Proceedings of the 11th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, NSDI 2014, pp. 157–172, 2014, Seattle, WA, USA, April 2–4(2014). https://www.usenix.org/conference/nsdi14/technical-sessions/presentation/popa

  28. Preibusch, S., Peetz, T., Acar, G., Berendt, B.: Purchase details leaked to PayPal. In: Financial Cryptography (2015). https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/476251

  29. Qureshi, A., MegÃas, D., Rifà -Pous, H.: Framework for preserving security and privacy in peer-to-peer content distribution systems. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(3), 1391–1408 (2015). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417414005351

  30. Renaud, K., Volkamer, M., Renkema-Padmos, A.: Why doesn’t jane protect her privacy? In: Privacy Enhancing Technologies, pp. 244–262. Springer (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ryck, P.D.: Client-side web security: mitigating threats against web sessions. Ph.D. thesis, University of Leuven (2014). https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/471059/1/thesis.pdf

  32. Schneier, B., Kelsey, J.: Secure audit logs to support computer forensics. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur. 2(2), 159–176 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Seneviratne, O., Kagal, L.: Enabling privacy through transparency. In: 2014 Twelfth Annual International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST), pp. 121–128. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Thomas, K., McCoy, D., Grier, C., Kolcz, A., Paxson, V.: Trafficking fraudulent accounts: The role of the underground market in twitter spam and abuse. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Usenix Security Symposium (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tsang, P.P., Au, M.H., Kapadia, A., Smith, S.W.: Blacklistable anonymous credentials: blocking misbehaving users without TTPs. In: ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 72–81 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tsang, P.P., Kapadia, A., Cornelius, C., Smith, S.W.: Nymble: blocking misbehaving users in anonymizing networks. IEEE Trans. Dependable Sec. Comput. 8(2), 256–269 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. De Capitani di Vimercati, S., Erbacher, R., Foresti, S., Jajodia, S., Livraga, G., Samarati, P.: Encryption and fragmentation for data confidentiality in the cloud. In: Aldini, A., Lopez, J., Martinelli, F. (eds.) Foundations of Security Analysis and Design VII, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8604, pp. 212–243. Springer International Publishing (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10082-1_8

  38. Whitten, A., Tygar, J.D.: Why johnny can’t encrypt: a usability evaluation of pgp 5.0. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on USENIX Security Symposium—Volume 8, pp. 14–14. SSYM’99, USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA, USA (1999). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1251421.1251435

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Comunidad de Madrid (Spain) under the project S2013/ICE-3095-CM (CIBERDINE).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Arroyo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Arroyo, D., Diaz, J., Gayoso, V. (2015). On the Difficult Tradeoff Between Security and Privacy: Challenges for the Management of Digital Identities. In: Herrero, Á., Baruque, B., Sedano, J., Quintián, H., Corchado, E. (eds) International Joint Conference. CISIS 2015. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 369. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19713-5_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19713-5_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19712-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19713-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics