Skip to main content

Endoscopy in Coloproctology

  • Chapter
Book cover Minimally Invasive Coloproctology
  • 800 Accesses

Abstract

More than 14 million colonoscopies are performed in the USA annually [1]. It is one of the most important diagnostic modalities in coloproctology, providing direct visualization of the entire colonic mucosa, histological specimens through biopsies and allowing therapeutic manipulations such as polypectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Seeff LC, Richards TB, Shapiro JA, Nadel MR, Manninen DL, Given LS, Dong FB, Winges LD, McKenna MT. How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC’s survey of endoscopic capacity. Gastroenterology. 2004;127(6):1670–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B, Vader JP. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61(3):378.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Enestvedt BK, Tofani C, Laine LA, Tierney A, Fennerty MB. 4-Liter split-dose polyethylene glycol is superior to other bowel preparations, based on systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10(11):1225.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rex DK, Deenadayalu VP, Eid E, Imperiale TF, Walker JA, Sandhu K, Clarke AC, et al. Endoscopist-directed administration of propofol: a worldwide safety experience. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(4):1229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Takahashi Y, Tanaka H, Kinjo M, Sakumoto K. Sedation-free colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(4):855–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamano HO, Yoshikawa K, Kimura T, et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation for colonoscopy: evaluation of gas volume, abdominal pain, examination time and transcutaneous partial CO2 pressure. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:1235–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hussein AM, Bartram CI, Williams CB. Carbon dioxide insufflation for more comfortable colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1984;30:68–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leung J, Mann S, Siao-Salera R, et al. A randomized, controlled trial to confirm the beneficial effects of the water method on U.S. veterans undergoing colonoscopy with the option of on-demand sedation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73(1):103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2533–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. East JE, Saunders BP, Burling D, et al. Surface visualization at CT colonography simulated colonoscopy: effect of varying field of view and retrograde view. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:2529–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fatima H, Rex DK, Rothstein R, et al. Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:109–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rex DK, Chadalawada V, Helper DJ. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:2000–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kondo S, Yamaji Y, Watabe H, et al. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the usefulness of a transparent hood attached to the tip of the colonoscope. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:75–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Nagorni, G. Bjelakovic, B. Petrovic. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(1):CD008361. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008361.pub2.

  15. Rex DK. Narrow-band imaging without optical magnification for histologic analysis of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(4):1174–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ignjatovic A, East JE, Subramanian V, Suzuki N, Guenther T, Palmer N, Bassett P, Ragunath K, Saunders BP. Narrow band imaging for detection of dysplasia in colitis: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(6):885–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Efthymiou M, Allen PB, Taylor AC, Desmond PV, Jayasakera C, De Cruz P, Kamm MA. Chromoendoscopy versus narrow band imaging for colonic surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19(10):2132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pfau PR, Sivak Jr MV, Chak A, Kinnard M, Wong RC, Isenberg GA, Izatt JA, Rollins A, Westphal V. Criteria for the diagnosis of dysplasia by endoscopic optical coherence tomography. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58(2):196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shen B, Zuccaro G, Gramlich TL, Gladkova N, Lashner BA, Delaney CP, Connor JT, et al. Ex vivo histology-correlated optical coherence tomography in the detection of transmural inflammation in Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2(9):754.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hong Kong Hospital Authority. Hong Kong Cancer Registry. [Internet]; [Cited 24th July 2015] Available from http://www3.ha.org.hk/cancereg/statistics.html

  21. Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Ho Ng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Luk, Y.W., Ng, P.H. (2015). Endoscopy in Coloproctology. In: Meng, W., Cheung, H., Lam, D., Ng, S. (eds) Minimally Invasive Coloproctology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19698-5_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19698-5_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19697-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19698-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics