Skip to main content

Intellectual Disability and Developmental Delay: Cytogenetic Testing

  • Chapter
  • 3570 Accesses

Abstract

Intellectual disability/developmental delay (ID/DD) is not a specific diagnosis, but a description of certain conditions in which intellectual functioning shows significant limitations when compared to the expected level for age. This chapter discusses the methods for evaluating an individual for ID/DD. In addition, advantages, limitations, and interpretation challenges are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shevell M, Ashwal S, Donley D, et al. Practice parameter: evaluation of the child with global developmental delay: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and The Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology. 2003;60:367–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rydz D, Srour M, Oskoui M, et al. Screening for developmental delay in the setting of a community pediatric clinic: a prospective assessment of parent-report questionnaires. Pediatrics. 2006;118:e1178–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kang HJ, Kawasawa YI, Cheng F, et al. Spatio-temporal transcriptome of the human brain. Nature. 2011;478:483–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. van Karnebeek CD, Jansweijer MC, Leenders AG, et al. Diagnostic investigations in individuals with mental retardation: a systematic literature review of their usefulness. Eur J Hum Genet. 2005;13:6–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rauch A, Hoyer J, Guth S, et al. Diagnostic yield of various genetic approaches in patients with unexplained developmental delay or mental retardation. Am J Med Genet A. 2006;140:2063–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. van Karnebeek CD, Koevoets C, Sluijter S, et al. Prospective screening for subtelomeric rearrangements in children with mental retardation of unknown aetiology: the Amsterdam experience. J Med Genet. 2002;39:546–53.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moeschler JB, Shevell M. Clinical genetic evaluation of the child with mental retardation or developmental delays. Pediatrics. 2006;117:2304–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Knight SJ, Horsley SW, Regan R, et al. Development and clinical application of an innovative fluorescence in situ hybridization technique which detects submicroscopic rearrangements involving telomeres. Eur J Hum Genet. 1997;5:1–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ligon AH, Beaudet al, Shaffer LG. Simultaneous, multilocus FISH analysis for detection of microdeletions in the diagnostic evaluation of developmental delay and mental retardation. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;61:51–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Manning M, Hudgins L. Array-based technology and recommendations for utilization in medical genetics practice for detection of chromosomal abnormalities. Genet Med. 2010;12:742–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, et al. Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;86:749–64.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pinkel D, Straume T, Gray JW. Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high-sensitivity, fluorescence hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;83:2934–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bejjani BA, Saleki R, Ballif BC, et al. Use of targeted array-based CGH for the clinical diagnosis of chromosomal imbalance: is less more? Am J Med Genet A. 2005;134:259–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lucito R, Healy J, Alexander J, et al. Representational oligonucleotide microarray analysis: a high-resolution method to detect genome copy number variation. Genome Res. 2003;13:2291–305.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ylstra B, van den Ijssel P, Carvalho B, et al. BAC to the future! or oligonucleotides: a perspective for micro array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH). Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:445–50.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Le Caignec C, Boceno M, Saugier-Veber P, et al. Detection of genomic imbalances by array based comparative genomic hybridisation in fetuses with multiple malformations. J Med Genet. 2005;42:121–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bejjani BA, Shaffer LG. Application of array-based comparative genomic hybridization to clinical diagnostics. J Mol Diagn. 2006;8:528–33.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sahoo T, Cheung SW, Ward P, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities using array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Genet Med. 2006;8:719–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shaffer LG, Kashork CD, Saleki R, et al. Targeted genomic microarray analysis for identification of chromosome abnormalities in 1500 consecutive clinical cases. J Pediatr. 2006;149:98–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Baldwin EL, Lee JY, Blake DM, et al. Enhanced detection of clinically relevant genomic imbalances using a targeted plus whole genome oligonucleotide microarray. Genet Med. 2008;10:415–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vissers LE, de Vries BB, Osoegawa K, et al. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the genome-wide detection of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;73:1261–70.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ishkanian AS, Malloff CA, Watson SK, et al. A tiling resolution DNA microarray with complete coverage of the human genome. Nat Genet. 2004;36:299–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hayashi S, Okamoto N, Chinen Y, et al. Novel intragenic duplications and mutations of CASK in patients with mental retardation and microcephaly with pontine and cerebellar hypoplasia (MICPCH). Hum Genet. 2012;131:99–110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Durand CM, Betancur C, Boeckers TM, et al. Mutations in the gene encoding the synaptic scaffolding protein SHANK3 are associated with autism spectrum disorders. Nat Genet. 2007;39:25–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. South ST. Chromosomal structural rearrangements: detection and elucidation of mechanisms using cytogenomic technologies. Clin Lab Med. 2011;31:513–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ravnan JB, Tepperberg JH, Papenhausen P, et al. Subtelomere FISH analysis of 11 688 cases: an evaluation of the frequency and pattern of subtelomere rearrangements in individuals with developmental disabilities. J Med Genet. 2006;43:478–89.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pickering DL, Eudy JD, Olney AH, et al. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis of 1176 consecutive clinical genetics investigations. Genet Med. 2008;10:262–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hochstenbach R, van Binsbergen E, Engelen J, et al. Array analysis and karyotyping: workflow consequences based on a retrospective study of 36,325 patients with idiopathic developmental delay in the Netherlands. Eur J Med Genet. 2009;52:161–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sagoo GS, Butterworth AS, Sanderson S, et al. Array CGH in patients with learning disability (mental retardation) and congenital anomalies: updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 studies and 13,926 subjects. Genet Med. 2009;11:139–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lu X, Shaw CA, Patel A, et al. Clinical implementation of chromosomal microarray analysis: summary of 2513 postnatal cases. PLoS One. 2007;2, e327.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Stankiewicz P, Beaudet al. Use of array CGH in the evaluation of dysmorphology, malformations, developmental delay, and idiopathic mental retardation. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2007;17:182–92.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Xiang B, Li A, Valentin D, et al. Analytical and clinical validity of whole-genome oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization for pediatric patients with mental retardation and developmental delay. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146A:1942–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lamb AN, Rosenfeld JA, Neill NJ, et al. Haploinsufficiency of SOX5 at 12p12.1 is associated with developmental delays with prominent language delay, behavior problems, and mild dysmorphic features. Hum Mutat. 2012. doi:10.1002/humu.22037.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kearney HM, Thorland EC, Brown KK, et al. American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variants. Genet Med. 2011;13:680–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Firth HV, Richards SM, Bevan AP, et al. DECIPHER: database of chromosomal imbalance and phenotype in humans using Ensembl resources. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84:524–33.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang J, Feuk L, Duggan GE, et al. Development of bioinformatics resources for display and analysis of copy number and other structural variants in the human genome. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2006;115:205–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sharp AJ. Emerging themes and new challenges in defining the role of structural variation in human disease. Hum Mutat. 2009;30:135–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Girirajan S, Eichler EE. Phenotypic variability and genetic susceptibility to genomic disorders. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19:R176–87.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah T. South Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gu, G., Toydemir, R., South, S.T. (2016). Intellectual Disability and Developmental Delay: Cytogenetic Testing. In: Leonard, D. (eds) Molecular Pathology in Clinical Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19674-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19674-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19673-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19674-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics