Skip to main content

Helping Another in Distress: Lessons from Rats

  • Chapter
The Evolution of Morality

Part of the book series: Evolutionary Psychology ((EVOLPSYCH))

Abstract

Understanding and responding to an offspring’s nutritional, thermoregulatory, and safety needs are not optional actions for mammalian mothers. In mammalian communities, affective communication and pro-social acts support social cohesion, which in turn maximizes every individual’s chances of survival and reproductive success. Reflecting the value of social cohesion and affective communication to mammals of all ages and both sexes, pro-social behavior is observed in rodents as well as primates. Given a rat-appropriate challenge, adult rats help another in distress by liberating a trapped rat from a small restrainer tube. Rats perform this pro-social act day after day and at shorter and shorter latencies, acting consistently and intentionally. Helping behavior occurs even if social contact between the helper and the recipient of help is prevented, by having the trapped rat released into a separate space. This result demonstrates that the helper rat helps independent of earning an immediate social reward. As is true of modern humans, rats help strangers as well as familiars. In the case of rats, help is extended to individually unfamiliar rats but only if those rats are of a familiar type, even if the type is not the same as their own biological type. Remarkably, cohousing with a single rat of a different stock is enough to confer familiarity to all rats of that stock. The helping behavior test opens doors to empirical testing of findings in humans, such as the influence of bystanders on the likelihood of helping, to disambiguate cultural and biological influences on human social behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Batson, C. D., Fultz, J., & Schoenrade, P. A. (1987). Distress and empathy: Two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. Journal of Personality, 55, 19–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ami Bartal, I., Decety, J., & Mason, P. (2011). Empathy and pro-social behavior in rats. Science, 334, 1427–1430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ami Bartal, I., Rodgers, D. A., Bernardez Sarria, M. S., Decety, J., & Mason, P. (2014). Pro-social behavior in rats is modulated by social experience. eLife, 3, e01385.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charities Aid Foundation. (2014). World giving index 2014. http://www.cafamerica.org/media/wgi-2014/

  • Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Church, R. M. (1959). Emotional reactions of rats to the pain of others. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 52(2), 132–134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clay, Z., & de Waal, F. B. (2013). Development of socio-emotional competence in bonobos. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 18121–18126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871/1998). The descent of man. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. B. (2008). Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 279–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J., Yang, C. Y., & Cheng, Y. (2010). Physicians down-regulate their pain empathy response: An event-related brain potential study. NeuroImage, 50, 1676–1682.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, S. W. (1990). Analysis of fundamental frequency reveals covariation in interview partners’ speech. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14, 237–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, H. F. (1958). The nature of love. American Psychologist, 13, 673–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, H. F., Dodsworth, R. O., & Harlow, M. K. (1965). Total social isolation in monkeys. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 54, 90–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. http://psychclassics.asu.edu/James/Principles/prin10.htm

  • Kanari, K., Kikusui, T., Takeuchi, Y., & Mori, Y. (2005). Multidimensional structure of anxiety-related behavior in early-weaned rats. Behavioural Brain Research, 156, 45–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kikusui, T., Winslow, J. T., & Mori, Y. (2006). Social buffering: Relief from stress and anxiety. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 361, 2215–2228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laird, J. D., & Bresler, C. (1992). The process of emotional experience: A self-perception theory. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Emotion. Review of personality and social psychology, No. 13 (pp. 213–234). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • LatanĂ©, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, J. R., & Baker, H. J. (2006). Historical foundations. In M. A. Suckow, S. H. Weisbroth, & C. L. Franklin (Eds.), The laboratory rat (pp. 1–52). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Niedenthal, P. M. (2007). Embodying emotion. Science, 316, 1002–1005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 1–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, G. E., & Gainer, P. (1962). “Altruism” in the albino rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 55, 123–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silberberg, A., Allouch, C., Sandfort, S., Kearns, D., Karpel, H., & Slotnick, B. (2014). Desire for social contact, not empathy, may explain “rescue” behavior in rats. Animal Cognition, 17, 609–618.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoltenberg, S. F., Christ, C. C., & Carlo, G. (2013). Afraid to help: Social anxiety partially mediates the association between 5-HTTLPR triallelic genotype and prosocial behavior. Social Neuroscience, 8, 400–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warneken, F., Hare, B., Melis, A. P., Hanus, D., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Spontaneous altruism by chimpanzees and young children. PLoS Biology, 5, e184.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peggy Mason .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mason, P. (2016). Helping Another in Distress: Lessons from Rats. In: Shackelford, T., Hansen, R. (eds) The Evolution of Morality. Evolutionary Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19671-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics