Abstract
An evolutionary perspective on human morality may help us understand and critique the law. This chapter examines three areas of American property law. In two of the three areas, title by first possession and title by adverse possession, the pieces of legal doctrine fit together when seen through an evolutionary lens. In the third area of law, compensation for eminent domain, the inconsistency between the legal doctrine and biologically predictable human attitudes suggests why governmental takings of property raise public ire and suggests what can be done to make the law less offensive to normal sensibilities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bentham, J. (1864). The theory of legislation, principles of the civil code, Part I. Dumont ed., Hildreth Trans.
Cribbet, J. E., & Johnson, C. E. (1989). Principles of the law of property (3rd ed.).
Davies, N. B. (1976). Food, flocking and territorial behaviour of the pied wagtail (Motacilla alba yarrellii Gould). Journal of Animal Ecology, 45, 235–253.
Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype; The long reach of the gene.
Egge, A. R., Brandt, Y., & Swallow, J. G. (2011). Sequential analysis of aggressive interactions in the stalk-eyed fly Teleopsis dalmanni. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65, 369–379.
Gintis, H. (2007). The evolution of private property. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 64, 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2006.02.002.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193–206.
Kaplan, B. (1983). Encounters with O.W. Holmes, Jr. Harvard Law Review, 96, 1828–1852.
Krebs, J. R. (1982). Territorial defence in the great tit (Parus major): Do residents always win? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 11, 185–194.
Maynard Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the theory of games.
Maynard Smith, J. (1989). Did Darwin get it right?
Maynard Smith, J., & Parker, G. A. (1976). The logic of asymmetric contests. Animal Behavior, 24, 159–175.
Mellencamp, J., & Green, G. Key West Intermezzo (I Saw You First).
Sigg, H., & Falett, J. (1985). Experiments on respect of possession and property in hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas). Animal Behaviour, 33, 978–984.
Stake, J. E. (2001). The uneasy case for adverse possession. Georgetown Law Journal, 89, 2419–2474.
Stevens, E. F. (1988). Contests between bands of feral horses for access to freshwater: The resident wins. Animal Behaviour, 36, 1851–1853.
Woodward, A. L. (1998). Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor’s reach. Cognition, 69, 1–34.
Woodward, A. L. (1999). Infants’ ability to distinguish between purposeful and non-purposeful behaviors. Infant Behavior and Development, 22, 145–160.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stake, J.E. (2016). Property Law Reflections of a Sense of Right and Wrong. In: Shackelford, T., Hansen, R. (eds) The Evolution of Morality. Evolutionary Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19671-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19671-8_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19670-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19671-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)