Skip to main content

Connecting Designing and Engineering Activities III

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Understanding Innovation ((UNDINNO))

Abstract

Nowadays, companies implement innovation processes or outsource them to external consulting companies to gain a competitive business advantage. The methodology of Design Thinking is one example for such an innovation process that enables the creation of innovative products or services, which make sense to people and for people, are likely to become a sustainable business model as well as are functionally possible in the foreseeable future.

But, innovators and engineers are seldom the same people, what makes documenting innovation projects with a subsequent information handover inevitable. In practice, this information handover seldom goes smoothly due to missing, incomplete, or not traceable documentation of innovation projects. The situation becomes even worse when important design rationales, design paths and design alternatives are not retrievable anymore, because the missing information may lead to a realization of the innovation that was not intended by the innovators. The retrieval of design paths, design rationales, and design alternatives requires high manual effort, if at all possible.

In this chapter, we present a recovery approach that eases the retrieval of design artifacts by recovering design paths before the actual retrieval happens. For that purpose, our recovery approach employs recovery modules that implement knowledge extraction procedures and recovery algorithms. We evaluate our recovery approach using inventory documentation collected in educational Design Thinking settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arkley P, Riddle S (2005) Overcoming the traceability benefit problem. In: CORD conference proceedings, April 2005, pp 385–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyhl T, Giese H (2015) Connecting designing and engineering activities II. In: Plattner H, Meinel C, Leifer L (eds) Design thinking research—building innovators. Springer, Cham, pp 211–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyhl T, Berg G, Giese H (2013a) Connecting designing and engineering activities. In: Plattner H, Meinel C, Leifer L (eds) Design thinking research—building innovation eco-systems. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyhl T, Berg G, Giese H (2013b) Towards documentation support for educational design thinking projects. In: International conference on engineering and product design education, September 2013, pp 408–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyhl T, Berg G, Giese H (2013c) Why innovation processes need to support traceability. In: Workshop on traceability in emerging forms of software engineering 2013, San Francisco, May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown T (2009) Change by design. HarperCollins, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamma E, Helm R, Johnson R, Vlissides J (1994) Design patterns—elements of reusable object-oriented software. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gericke L, Gumienny R, Meinel C (2011) Tele-Board: follow the traces of your design process history. In: Design thinking research. Springer, Berlin, July 2011, pp 15–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Goebel M, Gruenwald L (1999) A survey of data mining and knowledge discovery software tools. ACM SIGKDD explorations newsletter

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotel O, Finkelstein A (1997) Extended requirements traceability: results of an industrial case study. In: Proceedings of the third IEEE international symposium on requirements engineering 1997, pp 169–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotel OCZ, Morris SJ (2011) Out of the labyrinth: leveraging other disciplines for requirements traceability. In: 19th IEEE international requirements engineering conference (RE), pp 121–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber TR (1994) Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? Int J Hum Comput Stud 43(5):907–928

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumienny R, Gericke L, Wenzel M, Meinel C (2012) Tele-Board in use: applying a digital whiteboard system in different situations and setups. In: Plattner H, Meinel C, Leifer L (eds) Design thinking research—measuring performance in context. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 109–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch J (2014) Visualizing and searching of design thinking project documentation. Bachelor thesis, Potsdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroschk A (2014) Infering new knowledge into design thinking documentations. Bachelor thesis, Potsdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Menning A, Beyhl T, Giese H, Weinberg U, Nicolai C (2014) Introducing the LogCal: template-based documentation support for educational design thinking projects. In: International conference on engineering and product design education

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra M, Chaudhuri BB (2000) Information retrieval from documents: a survey. Inf Retr 2(2):141–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niere J, Wendehals L, Zündorf A (2003) An interactive and scalable approach to design pattern recovery. October 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Plattner H, Meinel C, Weinberg U (2009) Design Thinking—Innovation lernen—Ideenwelten öffnen. mi-Wirtschaftsbuch, Finanzbuch Verlag GmbH, March 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl K (1994) The three dimensions of requirements engineering: a framework and its applications. In: Selected papers from the fifth international conference on advanced information systems engineering. Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY, pp 243–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Voget L (2013) An association-based documentation tool to support design thinking groups in using their acquired knowledge. Master thesis, June 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler S, von Pilgrim J (2010) A survey of traceability in requirements engineering and model-driven development. Softw Syst Model 9(4):529–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Claudia Nicolai (D-School Potsdam) and Axel Menning (D-School Potsdam) for their input. The authors also thank their student assistants Josephine Harzmann, Manuel Hegner, Axel Kroschk, and Lukas Pirl for their support. We also give thanks to our bachelor project team “Intelligent Organization of Design Thinking Artifacts” for their input.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Beyhl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beyhl, T., Giese, H. (2016). Connecting Designing and Engineering Activities III. In: Plattner, H., Meinel, C., Leifer, L. (eds) Design Thinking Research. Understanding Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19641-1_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics