Skip to main content

Developing Design Thinking Metrics as a Driver of Creative Innovation

  • Chapter
Design Thinking Research

Part of the book series: Understanding Innovation ((UNDINNO))

Abstract

The creative behaviors that underpin design thinking are difficult to measure. This is problematic because people who have a desire to practice design thinking in an organizational context are often assessed only on their ability to execute via traditional metrics. Therefore they have less incentive to work in a creative way. In order for organizations to fully support and incentivize design thinking, they must measure creative behaviors as much as they do executional behaviors. This chapter highlights a suite of initial metrics that arose from research on d.school alumni and organizations applying design thinking as a core driver of their innovation strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in context: update to “The Social Psychology of Creativity”. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84(2):191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1994) Self‐efficacy. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab S, Squire K (2004) Design-based research: putting a stake in the ground. J Learn Sci 13(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courage C. (2013) Reweaving corporate DNA: building a culture of design thinking at Citrix. Resource document. Management Innovation eXchange. http://www.managementexchange.com/story/reweaving-corporate-dna-building-culture-design-thinking-citrix. Accessed 12 Dec 2013

  • Cross N (1990) The nature and nurture of design ability. Des Stud 11(3):127–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow SP, Glassco A, Kass J, Schwarz M, Schwartz DL, Klemmer SR (2010) Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 17(4):18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow SP, Klemmer SR (2011) The efficacy of prototyping under time constraints. In: Design thinking. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 111–128

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck CS (2000) Self-theories: their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck C (2006) Mindset: the new psychology of success. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser BG, Strauss AL (2009) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Transaction Publishers, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford JP (1968) Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications. RR Knapp, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorne G, Quintin EM, Saggar M, Bott N, Keinitz E, Liu N et al (2014) Impact and sustainability of creative capacity building: the cognitive, behavioral, and neural correlates of increasing creative capacity. In: Design thinking research. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 65–77

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley T, Kelley D (2013) Creative confidence: unleashing the creative potential within us all. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Marelaro N, Ganguly S, Steinert M, Jung M (2015) The personal trait myth: a comparative analysis of the innovation impact of design thinking tools and personal traits. In: Plattner H, Meinel C, Leifer L (eds) Design thinking research. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 41–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum B (2011) Design thinking is a failed experiment. So what’s next? Fast Company, April. Retrieved from http://www.fastcodesign.com/1663558/design-thinking-is-a-failed-experiment-so-whats-next

  • Royalty A, Oishi L, Roth B (2012) “I Use It Every Day”: pathways to adaptive innovation after graduate study in design thinking. In: Design thinking research. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 95–105

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Royalty A, Oishi L, Roth B (2014) Acting with creative confidence: developing a creative agency assessment tool. In: Design thinking research. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 79–96

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Royalty A, Ladenheim K, Roth B (2015) Assessing the development of design thinking: from training to organizational application. In: Plattner H, Meinel C, Leifer L (eds) Design thinking research. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 73–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco MA (1999) Divergent thinking. In: Runco MA, Pritzker SR (eds) Encyclopedia of creativity, vol 1. Academic, San Diego, pp 577–582

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk DH (1991) Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educ Psychol 26(3–4):207–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Royalty .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Royalty, A., Roth, B. (2016). Developing Design Thinking Metrics as a Driver of Creative Innovation. In: Plattner, H., Meinel, C., Leifer, L. (eds) Design Thinking Research. Understanding Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19641-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics