Abstract
The creative behaviors that underpin design thinking are difficult to measure. This is problematic because people who have a desire to practice design thinking in an organizational context are often assessed only on their ability to execute via traditional metrics. Therefore they have less incentive to work in a creative way. In order for organizations to fully support and incentivize design thinking, they must measure creative behaviors as much as they do executional behaviors. This chapter highlights a suite of initial metrics that arose from research on d.school alumni and organizations applying design thinking as a core driver of their innovation strategy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in context: update to “The Social Psychology of Creativity”. Westview Press, Boulder
Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84(2):191
Bandura A (1994) Self‐efficacy. Wiley, New York
Barab S, Squire K (2004) Design-based research: putting a stake in the ground. J Learn Sci 13(1):1–14
Courage C. (2013) Reweaving corporate DNA: building a culture of design thinking at Citrix. Resource document. Management Innovation eXchange. http://www.managementexchange.com/story/reweaving-corporate-dna-building-culture-design-thinking-citrix. Accessed 12 Dec 2013
Cross N (1990) The nature and nurture of design ability. Des Stud 11(3):127–140
Dow SP, Glassco A, Kass J, Schwarz M, Schwartz DL, Klemmer SR (2010) Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 17(4):18
Dow SP, Klemmer SR (2011) The efficacy of prototyping under time constraints. In: Design thinking. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 111–128
Dweck CS (2000) Self-theories: their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press, Philadelphia
Dweck C (2006) Mindset: the new psychology of success. Random House, New York
Glaser BG, Strauss AL (2009) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Transaction Publishers, New Jersey
Guilford JP (1968) Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications. RR Knapp, San Diego
Hawthorne G, Quintin EM, Saggar M, Bott N, Keinitz E, Liu N et al (2014) Impact and sustainability of creative capacity building: the cognitive, behavioral, and neural correlates of increasing creative capacity. In: Design thinking research. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 65–77
Kelley T, Kelley D (2013) Creative confidence: unleashing the creative potential within us all. Random House, New York
Marelaro N, Ganguly S, Steinert M, Jung M (2015) The personal trait myth: a comparative analysis of the innovation impact of design thinking tools and personal traits. In: Plattner H, Meinel C, Leifer L (eds) Design thinking research. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 41–57
Nussbaum B (2011) Design thinking is a failed experiment. So what’s next? Fast Company, April. Retrieved from http://www.fastcodesign.com/1663558/design-thinking-is-a-failed-experiment-so-whats-next
Royalty A, Oishi L, Roth B (2012) “I Use It Every Day”: pathways to adaptive innovation after graduate study in design thinking. In: Design thinking research. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 95–105
Royalty A, Oishi L, Roth B (2014) Acting with creative confidence: developing a creative agency assessment tool. In: Design thinking research. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 79–96
Royalty A, Ladenheim K, Roth B (2015) Assessing the development of design thinking: from training to organizational application. In: Plattner H, Meinel C, Leifer L (eds) Design thinking research. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 73–86
Runco MA (1999) Divergent thinking. In: Runco MA, Pritzker SR (eds) Encyclopedia of creativity, vol 1. Academic, San Diego, pp 577–582
Schunk DH (1991) Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educ Psychol 26(3–4):207–231
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Royalty, A., Roth, B. (2016). Developing Design Thinking Metrics as a Driver of Creative Innovation. In: Plattner, H., Meinel, C., Leifer, L. (eds) Design Thinking Research. Understanding Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19641-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19641-1_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19640-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19641-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)