Advertisement

The Effect of the Use of Motivators of Knowledge Sharing on the Outcome of Realized Business Strategies in Polish Manufacturing Enterprises

  • Justyna Patalas-MaliszewskaEmail author
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 373)

Abstract

This article aims to elaborate on a model as a decision-making model for assessing the value of the outcome of a realized business strategy by using the GMDH method in a manufacturing company. The construction of the model includes values of significant motivators of knowledge sharing from the 119 Polish manufacturing companies. In particular, this study pays attention to the likely consequences and results of the use of motivation factors on the output of a realized strategy in a manufacturing company. This is followed by a discussion of the results of the empirical studies and of the supporting literature. The summary indicates potential directions for further work.

Keywords

manufacturing company GMDH motivators of knowledge sharing strategy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Allen, D.G., Shore, L.M., Griffeth, R.W.: The role of perceived organizational support and supportive human resource practices in the turnover process. Journal of Management 29(1), 99–118 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allen, N.J., Meyer, J.P.: The measurement of antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology 63, 1–18 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bennet, R.: Employers’ demands for personal transferable skills in graduates: A content analysis of 1000 job advertisements and an associated empirical study. Journal of Vocational Education & Training 54(4), 457–476 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bodrow, W.: Toward European knowledge enterprises. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 18, 459–466 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carmeli, A., Gelbard, R., Goldriech, R.: Linking perceived external pres-tige and collective identification to collaborative behaviors in R&D teams. Expert Systems with Applications 38(7), 8199–8207 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chang, E.: Employees’ overall perception of HRM effectiveness. Human Relations 58(4), 523–544 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Evers, W., Brouwers, A., Tomic, W.: A quasi-experimental study on management coaching effectiveness. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research 58(3), 174–182 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Farlow, S.J. (ed.): Self-organizing Methods in Modelling: GMDH-type Algorithms. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York (1984)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    George, E., Chattopadhyay, P.: One foot in each camp: The dual identificationof contract workers. Administrative Science Quarterly 50(1), 68–99 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B., Wei, K.: Contributing knowledge to electronic repositories: An empirical investigation. Mis Quarterly 29(1), 113–143 (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liao, S.H., Fei, W.C., Chen, C.C.: Knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity, and innovation capacity: An empirical study of Taiwan’s knowledge intensive industries. Journal of Information Science 33, 340–359 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu, Y., Phillips, J.S.: Examining the antecedents of knowledge sharing in facilitating team innovativeness from a multilevel perspective. International Journal of Information Management 31, 44–52 (2011)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu, M., Liu, N.: Sources of knowledge acquisition and patterns of knowledge sharing behaviors—An empirical study of Taiwanese high-tech firms. International Journal of Information Management 28(5), 423–432 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Machuca, J., Jiménez, C., Garrido-Vega, P., de los Ríos, J.: Do technology and manufacturing strategy links enhance operational performance? Empirical research in the auto supplier sector. International Journal of Production Economics 133, 541–550 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McDermott, R.: Learning across teams. Knowledge Management Review 8(3), 32–36 (1999)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mintzberg, H.: The strategy concept 1: Five Ps for strategy. California Management Review 30, 11–24 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mullany, L.: “Girls on tour”: Politeness, small talk, and gender in managerial business meetings. Journal of Politeness Research 2, 55–77 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Namjae, C., Guo Zheng, L., Che-Jen, S.: An empirical study on the effect of individual factors on knowledge sharing by knowledge type. Journal of Global Business and Technology 3 (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Park, K.H., Favrel, J.: Virtual enterprise - information system and networking solution. Computers & Industrial Engineering 37(1-2), 441–444 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Patalas-Maliszewska, J.: Knowledge Worker Management: Value Assessment, Methods, and Application Tools. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Regnér, P.: Strategy-as-practice and dynamic capabilities: Steps towards a dynamic view of strategy. Human Relations 61, 565–588 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sharma, P., Tam, J.L.M., Kim, N.: Demystifying intercultural service encounters. Toward a comprehensive conceptual model. Journal of Service Research 12, 227–242 (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Terziovski, M.: Innovation practice and its performance implications in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector: a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal 31 (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vera-Muñoz, S.C., Ho, J.L., Chow, C.W.: Enhancing knowledge sharing in public accounting firms. Accounting Horizons 20, 133–155 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vomlelová, M., Vomlel, J.: Troubleshooting: NP-hardness and solution methods. Soft Computing 7(5), 357–368 (2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Welch, M., Jackson, P.R.: Rethinking internal communication: A stakeholder approach. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 12(2), 177–198 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yang, X., Alain, B.: Quantifying the value of knowledge within the context of product development 24, 166–175 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Zielona GóraZielona GóraPoland

Personalised recommendations