Abstract
This article analyzes method application in the context of new product development. Based on a study of 410 new product development projects, it is shown that applying methods in new product development leads directly to superior financial performance of the developed product (by reducing product costs, for example) and also leads indirectly to a greater degree of innovativeness, better cross-functional collaboration, and shorter time to market. The optimal combination of different method categories is examined and two key determinants of the successful adoption of new product development methods are analyzed, showing how firms can actively improve on what in some cases are very high failure rates of new products.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A detailed description of the research model, the statistical analysis and the results can be found in Graner and Mißler-Behr 2013 (isolated analysis of key determinants of method application); Graner and Mißler-Behr 2014 (impact of method application specifically on cross-functional collaboration on product success) and Graner 2013 (comprehensive model, in German language).
References
Barczak, G., Griffin, A., & Kahn, K. B. (2009). Trends and drivers of success in NPD practices: Results of the 2003 PDMA best practices study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(1), 3–23.
Chai, K., & Yan, X. (2006). The application of new product development tools in industry: The case of Singapore. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(4), 543–554.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Mahwah N.J.: Erlbaum.
Cordero, R. (1991). Managing for speed to avoid product obsolescence: A survey of techniques. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8(4), 283–294.
Danneels, E., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2001). Product innovativeness from the Firms’s perspective: Its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(6), 357–373.
Dumaine, B. (1989). How managers can succeed through speed. Fortune, 30–35.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. (1995). Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 84–110.
Ernst, H. (2002). Success factors of new product development: A review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(1), 1–40.
Ettlie, J. E., & Elsenbach, J. M. (2007). Modified stage gate® regimes in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(1), 20–33.
Evans, S. (1990). Implementation framework for integrated design teams. Journal of Engineering Design, 4(1), 355–363.
Fernandes, A. A., Vieira, S. D. S., Medeiros, A. P., & Natal Jorge, R. M. (2009). Structured methods of new product development and creativity management: A teaching experience. Creativity and Innovation Management, 18(3), 160–175.
Frohlich, M. T. (2002). Techniques for improving response rates in OM survey research. Journal of Operations Management, 20(1), 53–62.
Gatignon, H., Tushman, M., Smith, W., & Anderson, P. (2002). A structural approach to assessing innovation. construct development of innovation locus, type, and characteristics. Management Science, 48(9), 1103–1122.
Geschka, H., & Dahlem, S. (1996). Kreativitätstechniken und Unternehmenserfolg. Technologie & Management, 45(3), 106–110.
Graner, M. (2013). Der Einsatz von Methoden in Produktentwicklungsprojekten: Eine empirische Untersuchung der Rahmenbedingungen und Auswirkungen (Schriften zum europäischen Management). Springer Gabler Verlag, Heidelberg: Univ. Diss.
Graner, M., & Mißler-Behr, M. (2014). Method Application in New Product Development and the Impact on Cross-functional Collaboration and New Product Success. International Journal of Innovation Management, 18(1)
Graner, M., & Mißler-Behr, M. (2013). Key determinants of the successful adoption of new product development methods. European Journal of Innovation Management, 16(3), 301–316.
Graner, M., & Mißler-Behr, M. (2012). The use of methods in new product development: A review of empirical literature. International Journal of Product Development, 16(2), 158–184.
Griffin, A. (1993). Metrics for measuring product development cycle time. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10(2), 112–125.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433.
Henard, D. H., & Szymanski, D. M. (2001). Why some new products are more successful than others. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3), 362–375.
Horsch, J. (2003). Innovations- und Projektmanagement: Von der strategischen Konzeption bis zur operativen Umsetzung (1st ed.). Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.
Langerak, F., & Jan Hultink, E. (2006). The impact of product innovativeness on the link between development speed and new product profitability. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(3), 203–214.
Lindemann, U. (2003). Methods are Networks of Methods. In A. Folkeson, K Gralen, M Norell, & U Sellgren (Eds.), Proceedings ICED 03, the 14th International Conference on Engineering Design (pp. 625–626). Stockholm.
Nijssen, E. J., & Frambach, R. T. (2000). Determinants of the adoption of new product development tools by industrial firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(2), 121–131.
Poolton, J., & Barclay, I. (1998). New product development from past research to future applications. Industrial Marketing Management, 27, 197–221.
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2011). SmartPLS 2.0 (M3). Hamburg. Retrieved October 14, 2011, from http://www.smartpls.de.
Schlaak, T. (1999). Der Innovationsgrad als Schlüsselvariable: Perspektiven für d. Management von Produktentwicklungen. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.
Slotegraaf, R. J., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2011). Product development team stability and new product advantage: The role of decision-making processes. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 96–108.
Song, X. M., & Xie, J. (2000). Does innovativeness moderate the relationship between cross-functional integration and product performance? Journal of International Marketing, 8(4), 61–89.
Song, X. M., & Montoya-Weiss, M. M. (1998). Critical development activities for really new versus incremental products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(2), 124–135.
Sun, H., & Zhao, Y. (2010). The empirical relationship between quality management and the speed of new product development. Total Quality Management, 21(4), 351–361.
Thia, C. W., Chai, K. H., Bauly, J., & Xin, Y. (2005). An exploratory study of the use of quality tools and techniques in product development. The TQM Magazin, 17(5), 406–424.
Thieme, J., Song, X. M., & Shin, G. C. (2003). Project management characteristics and new product survival. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2), 104–119.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Investigated Methods
Appendix: Investigated Methods
Method/approach | Description |
---|---|
Research and development | |
Simultaneous/concurrent engineering | Simultaneous, distributed development, e.g., involving different development teams and/or locations |
Design for manufacturing/assembly (DFM/DFA) | Attention to or improvements in the “manufacturability” of the product (or of product costs) during the development phase |
Computer-aided engineering/design (CAE/CAD) | Use of computers as new product development tools, e.g., for design and technical drawing activities |
Quality function deployment (QFD)/house of quality | Method of identifying and evaluating product components that affects customer benefits (what does the customer want and how can it be realized on a technological level?). To this end, the benefit that a product component yields for customers (e.g., long standby times for mobile phones) is translated into technological and quality requirements (e.g., requirements placed on the battery and the display) |
Standardization/modular design | Standardization of product components and, where appropriate, use of modular building blocks to increase the number of identical parts (with the aim of reducing complexity and cutting costs) |
Collaborative supplier integration in product development | Active involvement of suppliers in product development, e.g., by running ideas competitions |
(Rapid) prototyping | Various manufacturing methods for the rapid production of prototype parts (e.g., 3D printing or laser deposit welding) |
Marketing research | |
Customer interviews and observations (e.g., monitored test markets) | Structured observation of customers (e.g., in the context of a video-monitored test market) or the conduct of interviews with customers (e.g., personal, on-site interviews or questionnaire-based telephone interviews) with the aim of identifying and better understanding what customers need/want |
Product (design) test (e.g., home-use tests) | Getting customers to try out products, e.g., in the context of home-use tests (where a product is supplied to customers who subject it to everyday use and provide feedback on their experience of the product) or product design tests (e.g., by demonstrating and evaluating different product designs) |
Price test/price sensitivity analysis | Method of determining the ideal price or price range |
Conjoint analysis | Market research method to identify the importance of individual product functions. To this end, several different combinations of products are showed to the test person and evaluated (comparison of pairs) |
Purchasing | |
Target costing | Calculation of the maximum cost of a product or component in light of its market price or target price (or how much the customer has been found to be willing to pay) |
Specified tenders | Eliciting of tenders from several suppliers based on detailed product specifications for each component that adds value and that must be purchased in order to manufacture the new product |
Total cost of ownership (TCO) | Calculation of all costs, from the development of a product to its withdrawal from the market (e.g., including downstream costs for the spare parts provisioning) |
Low-cost/best-cost country sourcing (L/BCCS) | Systematic sourcing in countries with low labor costs (e.g., in Eastern Europe) |
Quality and logistics | |
Supplier management and development | Direct intervention in the activities of suppliers and/or direct support for suppliers’ operations with the aim of improving suppliers’ skills and performance |
Design for six sigma (DFSS) | Quality management method with the aim of achieving zero-defect products and processes wherever possible |
Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) | Analytical method used in reliability engineering with the aim of identifying and evaluating potential weaknesses in a product at an early stage. To this end, potential sources of defects are weighted and assessed. This form of risk analysis is intended to identify and eliminate potential defects before they materialize |
Project management | |
Critical path analysis | Project milestone planning (“who is to do what by when?”) in which individual steps are coordinated and the “critical path” is defined (delays in these project steps lead to delays in the overall project) |
Product value/profitability analysis (break-even analysis, net present value, return on investment) | Structured project feasibility analysis, e.g., based on a break-even analysis or on the return on investment |
Project controlling (time and budget) | Regular project controlling to ensure that deadlines and budget targets are met and to monitor compliance with project milestones (e.g., by designated project controllers) |
Project risk controlling/project risk matrix | Visualization and monitoring of project risks (e.g., delays and quality considerations) |
Common methods | |
Creativity techniques (brainstorming, brainwriting, mind mapping, synectics, etc.) | Methods deployed to find creative solutions, e.g., intuitive methods (such as brainstorming) and discursive methods (based on logical reasoning sequences, such as morphological boxes) |
Benchmarking (competitive intelligence) | Structured comparison with both in-house products and products (or solutions) made by competitors |
SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) | Structured juxtaposition and analysis of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and risks associated with a product or a possible |
Scenario planning and analysis | A method of strategic planning designed to analyze the scope of potential events and their impacts (e.g., best-case, worst-case, and typical-case scenarios) |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Graner, M. (2016). Are Methods the Key to Product Development Success? An Empirical Analysis of Method Application in New Product Development. In: Chakrabarti, A., Lindemann, U. (eds) Impact of Design Research on Industrial Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19449-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19449-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19448-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19449-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)