Skip to main content

Are Methods the Key to Product Development Success? An Empirical Analysis of Method Application in New Product Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Impact of Design Research on Industrial Practice

Abstract

This article analyzes method application in the context of new product development. Based on a study of 410 new product development projects, it is shown that applying methods in new product development leads directly to superior financial performance of the developed product (by reducing product costs, for example) and also leads indirectly to a greater degree of innovativeness, better cross-functional collaboration, and shorter time to market. The optimal combination of different method categories is examined and two key determinants of the successful adoption of new product development methods are analyzed, showing how firms can actively improve on what in some cases are very high failure rates of new products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A detailed description of the research model, the statistical analysis and the results can be found in Graner and Mißler-Behr 2013 (isolated analysis of key determinants of method application); Graner and Mißler-Behr 2014 (impact of method application specifically on cross-functional collaboration on product success) and Graner 2013 (comprehensive model, in German language).

References

  • Barczak, G., Griffin, A., & Kahn, K. B. (2009). Trends and drivers of success in NPD practices: Results of the 2003 PDMA best practices study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(1), 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai, K., & Yan, X. (2006). The application of new product development tools in industry: The case of Singapore. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(4), 543–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Mahwah N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordero, R. (1991). Managing for speed to avoid product obsolescence: A survey of techniques. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8(4), 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2001). Product innovativeness from the Firms’s perspective: Its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(6), 357–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumaine, B. (1989). How managers can succeed through speed. Fortune, 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. (1995). Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 84–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H. (2002). Success factors of new product development: A review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(1), 1–40.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ettlie, J. E., & Elsenbach, J. M. (2007). Modified stage gate® regimes in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(1), 20–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, S. (1990). Implementation framework for integrated design teams. Journal of Engineering Design, 4(1), 355–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, A. A., Vieira, S. D. S., Medeiros, A. P., & Natal Jorge, R. M. (2009). Structured methods of new product development and creativity management: A teaching experience. Creativity and Innovation Management, 18(3), 160–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frohlich, M. T. (2002). Techniques for improving response rates in OM survey research. Journal of Operations Management, 20(1), 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, H., Tushman, M., Smith, W., & Anderson, P. (2002). A structural approach to assessing innovation. construct development of innovation locus, type, and characteristics. Management Science, 48(9), 1103–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geschka, H., & Dahlem, S. (1996). Kreativitätstechniken und Unternehmenserfolg. Technologie & Management, 45(3), 106–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graner, M. (2013). Der Einsatz von Methoden in Produktentwicklungsprojekten: Eine empirische Untersuchung der Rahmenbedingungen und Auswirkungen (Schriften zum europäischen Management). Springer Gabler Verlag, Heidelberg: Univ. Diss.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Graner, M., & Mißler-Behr, M. (2014). Method Application in New Product Development and the Impact on Cross-functional Collaboration and New Product Success. International Journal of Innovation Management, 18(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Graner, M., & Mißler-Behr, M. (2013). Key determinants of the successful adoption of new product development methods. European Journal of Innovation Management, 16(3), 301–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graner, M., & Mißler-Behr, M. (2012). The use of methods in new product development: A review of empirical literature. International Journal of Product Development, 16(2), 158–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, A. (1993). Metrics for measuring product development cycle time. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10(2), 112–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henard, D. H., & Szymanski, D. M. (2001). Why some new products are more successful than others. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3), 362–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horsch, J. (2003). Innovations- und Projektmanagement: Von der strategischen Konzeption bis zur operativen Umsetzung (1st ed.). Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Langerak, F., & Jan Hultink, E. (2006). The impact of product innovativeness on the link between development speed and new product profitability. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(3), 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann, U. (2003). Methods are Networks of Methods. In A. Folkeson, K Gralen, M Norell, & U Sellgren (Eds.), Proceedings ICED 03, the 14th International Conference on Engineering Design (pp. 625–626). Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijssen, E. J., & Frambach, R. T. (2000). Determinants of the adoption of new product development tools by industrial firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(2), 121–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poolton, J., & Barclay, I. (1998). New product development from past research to future applications. Industrial Marketing Management, 27, 197–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2011). SmartPLS 2.0 (M3). Hamburg. Retrieved October 14, 2011, from http://www.smartpls.de.

  • Schlaak, T. (1999). Der Innovationsgrad als Schlüsselvariable: Perspektiven für d. Management von Produktentwicklungen. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Slotegraaf, R. J., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2011). Product development team stability and new product advantage: The role of decision-making processes. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 96–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, X. M., & Xie, J. (2000). Does innovativeness moderate the relationship between cross-functional integration and product performance? Journal of International Marketing, 8(4), 61–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, X. M., & Montoya-Weiss, M. M. (1998). Critical development activities for really new versus incremental products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(2), 124–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, H., & Zhao, Y. (2010). The empirical relationship between quality management and the speed of new product development. Total Quality Management, 21(4), 351–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thia, C. W., Chai, K. H., Bauly, J., & Xin, Y. (2005). An exploratory study of the use of quality tools and techniques in product development. The TQM Magazin, 17(5), 406–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thieme, J., Song, X. M., & Shin, G. C. (2003). Project management characteristics and new product survival. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2), 104–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Graner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Investigated Methods

Appendix: Investigated Methods

Method/approach

Description

Research and development

 

Simultaneous/concurrent engineering

Simultaneous, distributed development, e.g., involving different development teams and/or locations

Design for manufacturing/assembly (DFM/DFA)

Attention to or improvements in the “manufacturability” of the product

(or of product costs) during the development phase

Computer-aided engineering/design (CAE/CAD)

Use of computers as new product development tools, e.g., for design and technical drawing activities

Quality function deployment (QFD)/house of quality

Method of identifying and evaluating product components that affects customer benefits (what does the customer want and how can it be realized on a technological level?). To this end, the benefit that a product component yields for customers (e.g., long standby times for mobile phones) is translated into technological and quality requirements (e.g., requirements placed on the battery and the display)

Standardization/modular design

Standardization of product components and, where appropriate, use of modular building blocks to increase the number of identical parts (with the aim of reducing complexity and cutting costs)

Collaborative supplier integration in product development

Active involvement of suppliers in product development, e.g., by running ideas competitions

(Rapid) prototyping

Various manufacturing methods for the rapid production of prototype parts (e.g., 3D printing or laser deposit welding)

Marketing research

 

Customer interviews and observations (e.g., monitored test markets)

Structured observation of customers (e.g., in the context of a video-monitored test market) or the conduct of interviews with customers (e.g., personal, on-site interviews or questionnaire-based telephone interviews) with the aim of identifying and better understanding what customers need/want

Product (design) test (e.g., home-use tests)

Getting customers to try out products, e.g., in the context of home-use tests (where a product is supplied to customers who subject it to everyday use and provide feedback on their experience of the product) or product design tests (e.g., by demonstrating and evaluating different product designs)

Price test/price sensitivity analysis

Method of determining the ideal price or price range

Conjoint analysis

Market research method to identify the importance of individual product functions. To this end, several different combinations of products are showed to the test person and evaluated (comparison of pairs)

Purchasing

 

Target costing

Calculation of the maximum cost of a product or component in light of its market price or target price (or how much the customer has been found to be willing to pay)

Specified tenders

Eliciting of tenders from several suppliers based on detailed product specifications for each component that adds value and that must be purchased in order to manufacture the new product

Total cost of ownership (TCO)

Calculation of all costs, from the development of a product to its withdrawal from the market (e.g., including downstream costs for the spare parts provisioning)

Low-cost/best-cost country sourcing (L/BCCS)

Systematic sourcing in countries with low labor costs (e.g., in Eastern Europe)

Quality and logistics

 

Supplier management and development

Direct intervention in the activities of suppliers and/or direct support for suppliers’ operations with the aim of improving suppliers’ skills and performance

Design for six sigma (DFSS)

Quality management method with the aim of achieving zero-defect products and processes wherever possible

Failure mode and effect

analysis (FMEA)

Analytical method used in reliability engineering with the aim of identifying and evaluating potential weaknesses in a product at an early stage. To this end, potential sources of defects are weighted and assessed. This form of risk analysis is intended to identify and eliminate potential defects before they materialize

Project management

 

Critical path analysis

Project milestone planning (“who is to do what by when?”) in which individual steps are coordinated and the “critical path” is defined (delays in these project steps lead to delays in the overall project)

Product value/profitability analysis (break-even analysis, net present value, return on investment)

Structured project feasibility analysis, e.g., based on a break-even analysis or on the return on investment

Project controlling (time and budget)

Regular project controlling to ensure that deadlines and budget targets are met and to monitor compliance with project milestones (e.g., by designated project controllers)

Project risk controlling/project risk matrix

Visualization and monitoring of project risks (e.g., delays and quality considerations)

Common methods

 

Creativity techniques (brainstorming, brainwriting, mind mapping, synectics, etc.)

Methods deployed to find creative solutions, e.g., intuitive methods (such as brainstorming) and discursive methods (based on logical reasoning sequences, such as morphological boxes)

Benchmarking (competitive intelligence)

Structured comparison with both in-house products and products (or solutions) made by competitors

SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats)

Structured juxtaposition and analysis of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and risks associated with a product or a possible

Scenario planning and analysis

A method of strategic planning designed to analyze the scope of potential events and their impacts (e.g., best-case, worst-case, and typical-case scenarios)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Graner, M. (2016). Are Methods the Key to Product Development Success? An Empirical Analysis of Method Application in New Product Development. In: Chakrabarti, A., Lindemann, U. (eds) Impact of Design Research on Industrial Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19449-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19449-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19448-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19449-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics