Skip to main content

Oran Dynamics: A Community-Based Biodiversity Management System in India’s Arid Zone

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dryland Forests

Abstract

Oran is a traditional biodiversity management system unique to Rajasthan, locally known as Devbani. Orans are common preserved sections of forest protected by villages in the name of gods or goddesses. Common pool resources such as Orans are usually managed under a mixture of open access (i.e. no effective owners or secured rights) and loosely defined common property regimes. The desert ecosystem, particularly in western Rajasthan, is very rich in livestock; hence, Orans are very important in the economy and the livelihood security of rural people and play an important role in promoting a flourishing livestock-based economy. Ancient laws utilized for the management for the Orans are based on a common belief in a divinity, and the entire community has an equal stake in the exploitation of the available resources. The conservation of resources and enforcement of the rules is the result of female dominance in managing Orans. The management committee comprises a general body that oversees the management of the forest as well as issues such as framing rules, resolving conflicts, taking action against offenders and distributing benefits. Utility maximizing behaviour, social pressure and cultural norms form a complex equation in Oran management. However, a comprehensive and well-tested approach to Oran management and conservation has not been developed or widely applied, and the rehabilitation of Orans needs proper planning and execution of a technically feasible package, tailored to suit their unique edaphic, climatic, vegetation, social and legal status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agarwal, B. (2001). Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Development, 29(10), 1623–1648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A., Chhatre, A., & Hardin, R. (2008). Changing governance of the world’s forests. Science, 320(5882), 1460–1462.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, L. D. (1977). Improving rangeland productivity. In Deseretification and its control. New Delhi: I.C.A.R.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, K. E. (1995). Institutional flaws of collective forest management. Ambio, 24, 349–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahunga, V. K., Luthra, V., & Rathore, B. M. S. (1994). Collective forest management in India. Ambio, 23, 269–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhalla, L. R. (1992). Physiography of Rajasthan. In H. S. Sharma & M. L. Sharma (Eds.), Geographical facets of Rajasthan (pp. 14–24). Ajmer: Kuldeep Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bose, P., Arts, B., & van Dijk, H. (2012). ‘Forest governmentality’: A genealogy of subject-making of forest-dependent ‘scheduled tribes’ in India. Land Use Policy, 29, 664–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. W. (2004). Reconsidering environmental policy prescriptive: Consequentialism and volitional pragmatism. Environmental and Resource Economics, 28(1), 73–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, L., & Berkes, F. (2005). Comanagement: Concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management, 75, 65–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry, P., Bohra, N. K., & Choudhary, K. R. (2011). Conserving biodiversity of community forests and rangelands of a hot arid region of India. Land Use Policy, 28(3), 506–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins, B. (2007). More than socially embedded: The distinctive character of “communal tenure” regimes in South Africa and its implications for land policy. Journal of Agrarian Change, 7(3), 281–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R. (1995). Collaborative management of forests for conservation and development. Gland: IUCN/WWF.

    Google Scholar 

  • FSI (Forest Survey of India). (2003). The state of forest report. Dehradun: FSI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil, M., & Guha, R. (1995). Ecology and equity: The use and abuse of nature in contemporary India. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil, M., & Vartak, V. D. (1975). The sacred groves of Western Ghats in India. Economic Botany, 30, 152–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil, M., & Vartak, V. D. (1994). The sacred uses of nature. In R. Guha (Ed.), Social ecology (pp. 90–119). Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoI (Government of India). (2008). India 2008: A reference manual. New Delhi: GoI, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gokhale, Y., Velankar, R., Subash Chandran, M. D., & Gadgil, M. (1998). Sacred woods, grasslands and waterbodies as self-organized systems of conservation. In P. S. Ramakrishnan, K. G. Saxena, & U. M. Chandrashekara (Eds.), Conserving the sacred for biodiversity management (pp. 365–398). New Delhi: Oxford and IBH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, A. G., & Gujar, B. R. (1989). Of gods, trees and boundaries: Divine conservation in Rajasthan. Asian Folklore Studies, 48, 211–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GoR (Government of Rajasthan). (2007). Economic review 2006-07. Jaipur: GoR, Directorate of Economics and Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K. (1986). Socioecology of stress: Why do common property resource management projects fail? In Proceedings of the conference on common property resource management. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, J. P. (2003). Management of community grazing lands for security and improved living. In Proceedings of the workshop on “Development of suitable strategies for rehabilitation of Oran Gauchar in Rajasthan” (pp. 9–19). Jodhpur: AFRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jodha, N. S. (1986). Common property resources and rural poor in dry regions of India. Economic and Political Weekly, 21(27), 1169–1181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanodia, K. C., & Patil, B. D. (1983). Pasture development. In A. Singh (Ed.), Desert resources and technology (Vol. I, pp. 263–305). Jodhpur: Scientific Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khare, A., Sarin, M., Saxena, N. C., Palit, S., Bathla, S., Vania, F., & Satyanarayana, M. (2000). Joint forest management: Policy, practice and prospects: India country study. Policy that works for forests and people (United Kingdom), no. 3/(London) (United Kingdom), IIED/WWF-India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnankutty, N., & Chandrasekaran, S. (2007). Biodiversity hotspots: Defining the indefinable? Current Science, 90, 1344–1345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, A. M., Barry, D., Dahal, G. R., & Colfer, C. J. P. (2010). Forests for people: Community rights and forest tenure reform (p. 263). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodrick, D. O. (1994). Rajasthan as a region: Myth or reality? In K. Schomer, J. L. Erdman, D. O. Lodrick, & L. I. Rudolph (Eds.), The idea of Rajasthan (Vol. 1, pp. 1–44). New Delhi: Manohar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luintel, H., & Chhetri, R. B. (2008). Understanding tenure security in community forestry. Journal of Forest and Livelihood, 7(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbile, P., Pa’ah, P., & Degrande, A. (2009). Cameroon forum on community organizations & networks – Sharing lessons and experiences on governance. Cameroon forum on community organization and networks, Yaounde, 5–7 Mar 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, S. J., Dean, W. R. J., Duplesis, M. A., & Siegfried, W. R. (1994). A conceptual model of arid rangeland degradation – The escalating cost of declining productivity. Bioscience, 44, 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, A., & Pal, S. (1994). The spirit of the sanctuary down to earth, 31 Jan. Available at: http://www.downtoearth.org.in/content/spirit-sanctuary

  • MoRD and NRSA (Ministry of Rural Development, India and National Remote Sensing Agency, India). (2005). Wastelands atlas of India. New Delhi/Hyderabad: GoI MoRD/NRSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1999). Self-governance and forest resources (Occasional paper series, Vol. 20). Bogor: CIFOR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, P. (1998). Authority and environment: Institutional landscapes in Rajasthan, India. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88, 410–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saigal, S., Dahal, G. R., & Vira, B. (2008). Cooperation in forestry: Analysis of forestry cooperatives in Rajasthan, India. Bogor: Centre for International Forestry Research/Rights and Resources Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savory, A. (1988). Holistic resource management. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlager, E., & Ostrom, E. (1992). Property-rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis. Land Economics, 68(3), 249–262. University of Wisconsin Press.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shankarnarayanan, K. A. (Ed.). (1988). Desert ecology. Jodhpur: Scientific Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A., & Bahl, R. (2006). Oran land issues: A livelihood concern for pastoralists in Rajasthan. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=981506 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.981506

  • Singh, A., & Gupta, A. (2010). Conserving Orans for sustainable livelihoods. LEISA India, Mar, 2010, pp. 18–21. Available at: http://www.agriculturesnetwork.org/magazines/india/1-livestock-for-sustainable-livelihoods/conserving-orans-for-sustainable-livelihoods/at_download/article_pdf

  • Singh, G., & Singh, B. (2010). Assessment of growth and biomass production of Cenchrus setigerus based silvipastoral system in community pasture land in Bhilwara district of Rajasthan. Indian Forest, 136, 898–909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A., & Sisodia, P. (2003). Oran – A traditional biodiversity management system in Rajasthan. LEISA India, 5, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, S. (1998). Constructing cooperation: The evolution of institutions of comanagement. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tewari, V. P., & Arya, R. (2005). Degradation of arid rangelands in Thar Desert, India: A review. Arid Land Research and Management, 18(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, F. G. I., Ros-Tonen, M. A. F., Hoogenbosch, L., & Acheampong, E. (2012). Addressing forest degradation and timber deficits in Ghana. ETFRN News, 53, 230–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmer, V. (2004). Community-based conservation and leadership: Frameworks for analyzing the equator initiative. CID graduate student working paper no. 2. Cambridge, MA: Science, Environment, and Development Group, Center for International Development, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandergeest, P. (1997). Rethinking property. The Common Property Resource Digest, 41, 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoby, M., Walker, B. H., & Noy-Meir, I. (1989). Opportunistic management for rangelands not at equilibrium. Journal Range Management, 42, 266–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2003). Land policies for growth and poverty reduction (Policy research report). New York: Oxford University Press/World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dheeraj Singh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Annex 1

Annex 1

Nature of species

Name

Used as

Tree

Acacia leucophloea

Most of the trees are used for collection of leaves, fruits, flowers, fuel wood and fallen timber

Albizia lebbeck

Anogeissus pendula

Acacia tortilis

A. nilotica

A. senegal

Azadirachta indica

Mimusops hexandra

Prosopis cineraria

P. juliflora

Salvadora oleoides

Salvadora persica

Tamarix aphylla

Tecomella undulata

Small trees and shrubs

Calligonum polygonoides

Many of the shrubs are used for fuel wood and fodder

Capparis deciduas

Acacia jacquemontii

Balanites roxburghii

Ziziphus nummularia

Calotropis procera

Crotolaria burhia

Aerva tomentosa

Clerodendrum phlomidis

Leptadenia pyrotechnica

Lycium barbarum

Grewia populifolia

Commiphora mukul

Euphorbia nerifolia

Cordia rothii

Herbs and grasses

Ephedra foliata

Most of them are used as fodder for animals. However, some have miscellaneous uses for medicine, thatching material, extraction of perfume, as vegetables, and for extraction of gums and resins

Asparagus racemosus

Corchorus spp.

Arnibia spp.

Euphorbia hirta

Sida cordifolia

Sueda fruticosa

Heliotropium spp.

Eleusine compressa

Dactyloctenium scindicum

Cenchrus biflorus

Cenchrus ciliaris

Cenchrus setigerus

Cynodon dactylon

Desmostachya bipinnata

Dichanthium annulatum

Lasiurus hirsutus

Panicum antidotale

Panicum turgidum

Phragmites species

P. turgidum

P. antidotale

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Singh, D., Choudhary, M.K., Meena, M.L., Roy, M.M. (2016). Oran Dynamics: A Community-Based Biodiversity Management System in India’s Arid Zone. In: Bose, P., van Dijk, H. (eds) Dryland Forests. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19405-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics