Skip to main content

Many-Valued Logics in Quantum Mechanics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quantum Physics, Fuzzy Sets and Logic

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Physics ((SpringerBriefs in Physics))

  • 1089 Accesses

Abstract

In the years 1925–1926 the development of quantum physics itself experienced a “quantum jump”: Under the influential works of Heisenberg, Schrödinger, Born, Jordan and Dirac [16] physicists abandoned the so-called “older quantum theory”, which was merely an amalgamate of ideas and models taken from classical physics with the addition of ad hoc “quantum conditions”, and developed quantum mechanics as an internally consistent, although mathematically highly sophisticated theory which, at least in its non-relativistic part, persists without drastic changes to the present. However, some implications of the new theory were so bizarre that there were scientists who claimed that quantum theory could not be comprehended on the grounds of classical two-valued logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Even in Poland: When in 1991 in the Polish National Library in Warsaw I had in my hands a copy of Zawirski’s paper [9] it turned out that the pages of a booklet were still not cut apart, i.e. most probably no one had read this copy during the whole 60 years! A tribute should be paid to Max Jammer, who mentions Zawirski’s papers in his famous book [11] on the philosophy of quantum mechanics. The interested reader will find in Chap. 8 of this book a more detailed historical survey of the applications of many-valued logics in the foundations of quantum mechanics up to the early seventies of the XX century.

References

  1. Heisenberg, W. “Über quantentheotetische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen”, Zeitschrift für Physik. 33 879–893.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schrödinger, E. “Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem”, Annalen der Physik, 79 (1926) 361–376; 499–507; 80 (1926) 437–490; 81 (1926) 109–139.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Born, M., and P. Jordan, “Zur Quantenmechanik”, Zeitschrift für Physik, 34 (1925) 858–888.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Born, M., W. Heisenberg, and P. Jordan, “Zur Quantenmechanik II”, Zeitschrift für Physik, 35 (1926) 557–615.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Born, M. “Zur Quantenmechanik der Stossvorgänge”, Zeitschrift für Physik, 37 (1926) 863–867.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dirac, P. A. M. “The fundamental equations of quantum mechanics”, Proc. Royal Society of London (A), 109 (1925) 642–653.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zawirski, Z. “Jan Łukasiewicz 3-valued logic. On the logic of L. E. J. Brouwer. Attempts at applications of many-valued logic to contemporary natural science”, Sprawozdania Poznańskiego Towarzystwa Przyjaciół Nauk, 2–4 (1931) 1–8 (in Polish).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zawirski, Z. “Les logiques nouvelles et le champ de leur application”, Revue de Métaphisique et de Morale, 39 (1932) 503–519.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zawirski, Z. “Relationship between many-valued logic and the calculus of probability”, Prace Komisji Filozoficznej Poznańskiego Towarzystwa Przyjaciół Nauk, 4 (1934) 155–240 (in Polish).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zwicky, F. “On a new type of reasoning and some of its possible consequences”, Physical Review, 43 (1933) 1031–1033.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jammer, M. The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Février, P. “Les relations d’incertitude de Heisenberg et la logique”, Comptes rendus Acad. Sci. Paris, 204 (1937) 481–483.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Destouches-Février, P. “Logiques et theories physiques”, Congrès International de Philosophie des Sciences, Paris 1949 (Herman, Paris, 1951) pp. 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reichenbach, H. Philosophic Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1944).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reichenbach, H. “The principle of anomaly in quantum mechanics”, Dialectica, 2 (1948) 337–350.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reichenbach, H. “Über die erkenntnistheoretische Problemlage und den Gebrauch einer dreiwertigen Logik in der Quantenmechanik”, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 6a (1951) 569–575.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reichenbach, H. “Les fondements logiques de la mécanique des quanta”, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré, 13 (1952–1953) 109–158.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Feynman, R. P., R. B. Leighton, and M. Sands, The Feynmann Lectures on Physics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1965) Vol III, p. 1–1.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Putnam, H. “Three-valued logic”, Philosophical Studies, 8 (1957) 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  20. von Weizsäcker, C. F. “Die Quantentheorie der einfachen Alternative”, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 13a (1958) 245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pavičić, M. “Bibliography on quantum logics and related structures”, International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 31 (1992) 373–461.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Birkhoff, G. and J. von Neumann, “The logic of quantum mechanics”, Annals of Mathematics, 37 (1936) 823–843.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jarosław Pykacz .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pykacz, J. (2015). Many-Valued Logics in Quantum Mechanics. In: Quantum Physics, Fuzzy Sets and Logic. SpringerBriefs in Physics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19384-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics