Skip to main content

Nobel Prizes and New Technologies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Synthetic Nitrogen Industry in World War I

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Molecular Science ((BRIESFHISTCHEM))

  • 830 Accesses

Abstract

Following the signing of the Armistice on 11 November 1918, Fritz Haber sent his family to Switzerland. Fearing that he would be charged as a war criminal, in particular for his involvement with gas warfare, Haber destroyed sensitive documents, grew a beard, and in disguise travelled to Switzerland to join his family. Though there were claims of charges made against Haber, they were not substantiated. Meantime the Swedish Royal Academy, in its deliberations related to the Nobel Prize for Chemistry, had from 1912 returned to an interest in nitrogen fixation, considering Haber, whose name was brought up in 1912, 1913, 1915, and 1916, including jointly with Carl Bosch in 1915 and 1916, as a strong candidate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Miolati was probably referring to an event related to the September 1924 centennial of the Franklin Institute, Philadelphia. See Fritz Haber, Practical Results of the Theoretical Development of Chemistry; an address by Professor F. Haber, on the occasion of the centenary celebration of the founding of the Franklin Institute and the inauguration exercises of the Bartol Research Foundation, September 17, 18, 19, 1924. Philadelphia: Franklin Institute, 1924.

  2. 2.

    The Minimata facility was later to gain considerable notoriety arising from poisoning of villagers due to releases of mercury sludge. Nippon Chisso Hiryō Kabushki Kaisha (Nichitsu), became Chisso in 1965, and Japan New Chisso in 2012.

  3. 3.

    At the close of the 20th century, four products represented the mainstay of the ammonia-based fertilizer industry: granular ammonium nitrate; liquid anhydrous ammonia; ammonium nitrate; and urea. More recently, urea has come into favour, due to its higher concentration of nitrogen. This enables more careful application, with less damage to the environment. Composite fertilizers containing nitrogen, potassium and phosphorus, the concentrated three-component NPK products, were introduced in the mid-1920s by I.G. Farben as Nitrophoska.

    Ammonium nitrate, made from hot ammonia and nitric acid, after removal of water, is sprayed in a tower, where small lumps are formed, called prills. According to density, prills are used as fertilizer or in manufacture of explosives. Ammonium nitrate is highly explosive under certain conditions. In September 1921, a mixture of ammonium nitrate and ammonium sulphate at Oppau exploded, with loss of over 600 lives, in addition to 2,000 injuries. This followed detonation of a hardened mixture while it was being broken up with small explosive charges. Carl Krauch , the upcoming BASF high-pressure chemist, was responsible for reconstruction, which took just twelve weeks, and brought about his elevation to the managing board of BASF. In September 2001, there was another major accidental explosion of ammonium nitrate, this time at the Toulouse ammonia factory in France. In April 2013 there was a further explosion, in Texas.

  4. 4.

    After 1918, Bamag (Bamag-Meguin from 1924) became a major supplier of nitric acid plants throughout Europe and Japan. The introduction of stainless steels overcame many of the corrosion problems. The most important feature of the ammonia oxidation plant, as introduced in Germany, was the special chrome-steel converter in which layers of catalyst were laid out horizontally. The catalyst, made up of a fine wire of platinum-rhodium alloy, was woven into a large circular gauze. The rhodium, representing 10 % of the catalyst wire, gave strength and minimized loss of platinum. Ammonia oxidation plants developed during World War I were to become the basis of all such installations in use until the 1950s and beyond (some oxidation plants that operated under conditions of high pressure were developed in the 1920s, though these were introduced generally after World War II). In 1926, ICI at Billingham constructed its first nitric acid plant for oxidation of synthetic ammonia. In 1939, the British Ministry of Supply took delivery of ten-foot diameter gauzes, which became the norm for industrial use. In the converter the ammonia is vaporized over warm water and mixed with air. The gas mixture is then sucked through the converter or pushed through at low pressure and the gauze electrically heated to start the reaction. The reaction mixture is rapidly removed, cooled and taken up into dilute nitric acid, or water. The uptake is slow and makes the operation expensive. Production of nitric acid by the platinum oxidation process continues to be maintained at high levels in civilian economies for reaction with ammonia to form ammonium nitrate (“nitram,” etc.) fertilizer.

  5. 5.

    Though production of calcium cyanamide increased during the 1920s, reaching a peak in 1928, its overall share of the fertilizer market declined. In the mid-1930s its agricultural applications were extended to use as an effective defoliant, based on herbicidal properties, and, before planting of crops, as seed-bed sterilizer. Studies on dicyanamide had been undertaken by Caro and colleagues shortly after 1900. It became important in the manufacture of melamine resins. Cyanamide found uses in the synthesis of sulpha drugs, and as an intermediate, including for acrylonitrile.

References

  1. Coffey P (2008) Cathedrals of science: the personalities and rivalries that made modern chemistry. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 119–120

    Google Scholar 

  2. Widmalm S (1995) Science and neutrality: the Nobel prizes of 1919 and scientific internationalism. Minerva 33:339–360, on 343

    Google Scholar 

  3. Haber F (1920) The synthesis of ammonia from its elements, Nobel lecture, June 2, 1920. Nobelstiflesen Foundation, Stockholm 1920

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alexander J (1920) Nobel award to Haber: source of resentment felt in allied countries. The New York Times, 3 Feb 1920

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stoltzenberg D (1994) Fritz Haber: Chemiker, Nobelpreisträger, Deutscher, Jude. VCH, Weinheim, pp 487–499

    Google Scholar 

  6. The Adolph and Albert Frank Collection of papers and correspondence, Leo Baeck Institute, New York, AR 7176/MF772

    Google Scholar 

  7. Demangeon A (1928) La production et la consommation d’azote synthétique dans le monde. Ann de Géogr 37(208):375–376

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tamaru S (1916) On the experimental technics of calorimetric measurements at high temperatures. J Soc Chem Ind 35:81–88

    Google Scholar 

  9. Oyama HT (2015) Setsuro Tamaru and Fritz Haber: links between Japan and Germany in science and technology. Chem Rec. doi:10.1002/tcr.201402086

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pattison M (1983) Scientists, inventors and the military in Britain, 1915–19: the Munitions Inventions Department. Soc Stud Sci 13(4):521–568

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brock WH (2009) J. R. Partington (1886–1965): physical chemistry in deed and word. Bull Hist Chem 34:11–20

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Department of Scientific and Industrial Research: Ministry of Munitions papers, DSIR 37, The National Archives, Kew, UK

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sogner K (1998) Norwegian capitalists and the fertiliser business: the case of Hafslund and the Odda process. In: Travis AS, Homburg E, Schröter H, Morris PJT (eds) Determinants in the evolution of the European chemical industry, 1900–1939: new technologies, political frameworks, markets and companies. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 239–256

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Fairlie AM (1936) Sulfuric acid manufacture. Reinhold, New York, p 151

    Google Scholar 

  15. Imison CS, Russell W (1922) The oxidation of ammonia. J Soc Chem Ind 41:37T–45T

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moulton HF (1922) The life of Lord Moulton. Nisbet & Co., London, p 207

    Google Scholar 

  17. Parliamentary News (1918) House of Commons. J Soc Chem Ind 37:179R–180R, on 180R

    Google Scholar 

  18. Scott EK (1917) Manufacture of synthetic nitrates by electric power. J Soc Chem Ind 36:771–777

    Google Scholar 

  19. Humphrey HA (1920) The report of the Nitrogen Products Committee. J Soc Chem Ind 39:25R–29R, on 25R, 26R, 27R

    Google Scholar 

  20. Reader WJ (1970) Imperial Chemical Industries: a history, 2 vols. Vol 1. The forerunners, 1870–1926. Oxford University Press, London, pp 347–370

    Google Scholar 

  21. Travis AS (1998) High pressure industrial chemistry: the first steps, 1909–1913, and the impact. In: Travis AS, Homburg E, Schröter HG, Morris PJT (eds) Determinants in the evolution of the European chemical industry, 1900–1939: new technologies, political frameworks, markets and companies. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 3–21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Kauffman GB (1970) Arturo Miolati (1869–1956). Isis 61(2):241–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cariati V, Cavallone S, Maraini E, Zamagni V, (eds) (2013) Storia delle società Italiana di ingegneria e impiantistica. Il Mulino, Bologna, pp 55ff

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zardi U, Zardi F (2009) 100 not out. History of the birth of the modern synthetic ammonia industry. Paper presented at the Nitrogen & Syngas International Conference and Exhibition, Rome, Italy (22–25 February 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fabi L (ed) (2003) La SIRI: la fabbrica della ricerca Luigi Casale e l’ammoniaca sintetica a Terni (exhibition catalogue). Locale Antenna Pressa, Terni, Centro di Documentazione sul Patrimonio Industriale

    Google Scholar 

  26. Caro N (1927) Glossen zur Stickstoff-Industrie. Die chemische Industrie 50(6):181–185

    Google Scholar 

  27. Miolati A (1927) Synthetic ammonia and the Casale process. Amplified edition of a lecture delivered the 27th February 1927 at the Institute of Chemistry of the Polytechnic School of Prague. Ammonia Casale SA, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  28. Isella D (ed) (1982) Carteggio dell’ing. C. E. Gadda con l’ ‘Ammonia Casale S. A.’ 1927–1940. Stamperia Valdonega, Verona

    Google Scholar 

  29. Achilladelis BG (1973) Process innovation in the chemical industry. Ph.D. thesis, University of Sussex, pp 148–153

    Google Scholar 

  30. Meinzer L (1998) ‘Productive collateral’ or ‘economic sense?’: BASF under French occupation, 1919–1923. In: Travis AS, Homburg E, Schröter HG, Morris, PJT (eds) Determinants in the evolution of the European chemical industry, 1900–1939: new technologies, political frameworks, markets and companies. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 51–63, on 60–63

    Google Scholar 

  31. Franco-German synthetic-ammonia convention (1920). J Soc Chem Ind 39:305R

    Google Scholar 

  32. Notes and news France (1921) J Soc Chem Ind 40(10):193R

    Google Scholar 

  33. Forbes RJ, O’Beirne DR (1957) The technical development of the Royal Dutch/Shell, 1890–1940. EJ Brill, Leiden, pp 503–507

    Google Scholar 

  34. van Rooij A, Homburg E (2002) Building the plant. A history of engineering contracting in the Netherlands. Walburg Pers, Zutphen, pp 34–41

    Google Scholar 

  35. van Rooij A (2005) Why do firms acquire technology? The example of DSM’s ammonia plants, 1925–1970. Research Policy 34(6):836–851

    Google Scholar 

  36. van Rooij A (2005) Engineering contractors in the chemical industry. The development of ammonia processes, 1910–1940. Hist Technol 21(4):345–366

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kudo A (2000) Dominance through cooperation: I.G. Farben’s Japan strategy. In: Lesch JE (ed) The German chemical industry in the twentieth century. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 243–283, on 271–276

    Google Scholar 

  38. Haynes W (1957) On the chemical frontier: the Cyanamid story. Copy held at Sidney M. Edelstein Library for the History and Philosophy of Science, Technology and Medicine, National Library of Israel, p 42

    Google Scholar 

  39. Haynes W (1945) American chemical industry: a history, 1912–1922, vol 2. D Van Nostrand, New York, pp 78–111

    Google Scholar 

  40. Steen K (2014) The American synthetic organic chemicals industry: war and politics, 1910–1930. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, pp 180–182

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sill TW (1919), American officers in German chemical plants. The dyestuff plants and their war activities. In: Dyestuffs: hearings before the Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives, on H.R. 2706 and H.R. 6495, 18–20 June and 14–18 July 1919 [66th Cong., 1st Sess., 1919]. Committee on Ways and Means. Government Printing Office, Washington, pp 173–177, on 175

    Google Scholar 

  42. Drinkner P (1919) Dyestuffs: hearings before the Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives, on H.R. 2706 and H.R. 6495, 18–20 June and 14–18 July 1919 [66th Cong., 1st Sess., 1919]. Committee on Ways and Means. Government Printing Office, Washington, p 534

    Google Scholar 

  43. Notes and news (1921) United States: the Fixed Nitrogen Research Laboratory. Chem Ind London (J Soc Chem Ind 42), no. 4 (26 January), p 80

    Google Scholar 

  44. Clarke MJ (1976) The federal government and the fixed nitrogen industry, 1915–1926. Ph.D. dissertation, Oregon State University

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ericksen GE (1983) The Chilean nitrate deposits. Am Sci 71:366–374

    Google Scholar 

  46. Travis AS (2004) Dyes made in America. The Calco Chemical Company, American Cyanamid and the Raritan River. Edelstein Center, Jerusalem

    Google Scholar 

  47. Reinhardt C (1998). Basic research in industry: two case studies at I.G. Farbenindustrie AG in the 1920’s and 1930’s. In: Travis AS, Homburg E, Schröter HG, Morris, PJT (eds) Determinants in the evolution of the European chemical industry, 1900–1939: new technologies, political frameworks, markets and companies. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 67–88, on 81–86

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hughes TP (1969) Technological momentum in history: hydrogenation in Germany, 1898–1933. Past and Present 44:106–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Stranges AN (1984) Friedrich Bergius and the rise of the German synthetic fuel industry. Isis 75:643–667

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tongue H (1934) The design and construction of high pressure chemical plant. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  51. Barnes Z (1993) Friedrich Bergius. 1884–1949. In: James LK (ed) Nobel laureates in chemistry 1901–1992. History of modern chemical sciences. American Chemical Society, Washington DC, pp 192–197

    Google Scholar 

  52. Steinmüller F (1993) Carl Bosch. 1874–1940. In: James LK (ed) Nobel laureates in chemistry 1901–1992. History of modern chemical sciences. American Chemical Society, Washington DC, pp 198–204

    Google Scholar 

  53. Kastens ML, McBurney WG (1952) Calcium cyanamide. In: Modern chemical processes, 3 vols (1952, 1953, 1954), vol. 2. Reinhold, New York, pp 97–110

    Google Scholar 

  54. Travis AS (2004) Dyes made in America. The Calco Chemical Company, American Cyanamid and the Raritan River. Edelstein Center, Jerusalem, pp 120–124

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony S. Travis .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Authors

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Travis, A.S. (2015). Nobel Prizes and New Technologies. In: The Synthetic Nitrogen Industry in World War I. SpringerBriefs in Molecular Science(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19357-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics