Abstract
Extensive urban planning implementation evaluation research has reported that actual urban growth significantly deviates from planned urban forms officially approved by planning departments in China. Researchers, planners and decision makers are interested in whether a planned urban form can be fully implemented in future. In this chapter, we propose an approach “form scenario analysis” (FSA) for examining the “possibility of implementing planned urban forms. This process is of the opposite to conventional urban growth scenario analysis, in which development policies are set as the input scenario conditions to generate various urban forms in future. A constrained cellular automata tool as a planning support system is developed for applying the FSA approach to evaluate planned urban forms. This model employs a planned urban form as the input scenario condition, aiming to identify whether any of the existing development policies can be used to realize the predefined urban form. If yes, the development policies required for the scenario form can be followed. To illustrate the applicability of FSA, we evaluated four planning alternatives for the Beijing Master Plan 2020 using the tool. The corresponding policy parameters are generated, together with in-depth policy implications for the study area. Our finding is that the planned urban form approved by the State Council of P. R. China (Alternative A in the paper) cannot be realized in the context of the current development policies of Beijing. The other three alternatives (Alternative B, C and D) differ from each other in terms of implementation probability and development policies required. This suggests that planners can adopt this simple tool to eliminate impossible planned urban forms at the early stage of compiling plans.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beijing Municipal Planning Committee. (2007). Ecologically limited land-use planning in Beijing (2006–2020) (in Chinese). Internal report.
Beijing Municipal Planning Committee, Beijing Institute of City Planning, Beijing Academy of Urban Planning. (2006). Beijing urban planning atlas (1949–2005) (in Chinese). Internal published book.
Beijing Municipal Statistics Bureau, NBS Survey Office in Beijing. (1987). Beijing statistical yearbook 1987. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
Beijing Municipal Statistics Bureau, NBS Survey Office in Beijing. (2007). Beijing statistical yearbook 2007. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
Beijing Planning Commission. (1988). Beijing land resources (in Chinese). Beijing: Beijing SciTech Press.
Clark, K. C., & Gaydos, L. J. (1998). Loose-coupling a cellular automation model and GIS: Long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12(7), 699–714.
Couclelis, H. (2005). “Where has the future gone?” Rethinking the role of integrated land-use models in spatial planning. Environment and Planning A, 37(8), 1353–1371.
Engelen, G., White, R., & Uljee, I. (1997). Integrating constrained cellular automata models, GIS and decision support tools for urban and regional planning and policy making. In H. Timmermans (Ed.), Decision support systems in urban planning (pp. 125–155). London: E&FN Spon.
Engelen, G., White, R., & Nijs, T. D. (2003). Spatial support system for the integrated assessment of socio-economic and environmental policies in the Netherlands. Integrated Assessment, 4, 97–105.
Ewing, R., Schmid, T., Killingsworth, R., Zlot, A., & Raudenbush, S. (2003). Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18, 47–57.
Guan, G., Wang, L., & Clark, K. C. (2005). An artificial-neural-network-based, constrained CA model for simulating urban growth. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 32(4), 369–380.
Han, H., Lai, S., Dang, A., Tan, Z., & Wu, C. (2009). Effectiveness of urban construction boundaries in Beijing: An assessment. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A, 10(9), 1285–1295.
Kahn, M. (2000). The environmental impact of suburbanization. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19, 569–586.
Kahn, J., & Wiener, A. J. (1967). The year 2000: A framework for speculation on the next 33 years. New York: MacMillan Press.
Klosterman, R. E. (1999). The what if? Collaborative planning support system. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26(3), 393–408.
Landis, J. D. (1994). The California urban future model: A new generation of metropolitan simulation models. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 21(4), 399–420.
Landis, J. D. (1995). Imaging land use futures: Applying the California urban future model. Journal of American Planning Association, 61(4), 438–457.
Landis, J. D., & Zhang, M. (1998a). The second generation of the California urban future model, Part 1: Model logic and theory. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25(5), 657–666.
Landis, J. D., & Zhang, M. (1998b). The second generation of the California urban future model, Part 2: Specification and calibration results of the land-use change submodel. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25(6), 795–824.
Li, X., & Yeh, A. G. O. (2000). Modeling sustainable urban development by the integration of constrained cellular automata and GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14(2), 131–152.
Li, X., & Yeh, A. G. O. (2002). Neural-network-based cellular automata for simulating multiple land use changes using GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 16(4), 323–343.
Li, X., & Yeh, A. G. O. (2004). Data mining of cellular automata’s transition rules. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18(8), 723–744.
Li, X., Yang, Q., & Liu, X. (2008). Discovering and evaluating urban signatures for simulating compact development using cellular automata. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86(2), 177–186.
Ligtenberg, A., & Bregt, A. K. (2001). Multi-actor-based land use modelling: Spatial planning using agents. Landscape and Urban Planning, 56(1–2), 21–33.
Liu, X., Wang, J., Liu, M., & Meng, B. (2005). Spatial heterogeneity of the driving forces of cropland change in China. Science in China Series D-Earth Sciences, 48(12), 2231–2240.
Long, Y., & Shen, Z. (2011). An urban model using complex constrained cellular automata: Long-term urban form prediction for Beijing. International Journal of Society Systems Science, 3(1–2), 159–173.
Long, Y., Mao, Q., & Dang, A. (2009). Beijing urban development model: Urban growth analysis and simulation. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 14(6), 787–794.
Long, Y., Shen, Z., & Mao, Q. (2010). An urban containment planning support system for Beijing. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 35(4), 297–307.
Pearman, A. D. (1988). Scenario construction for transportation planning. Transportation Planning and Technology, 12(1), 73–85.
Ratcliffe, J. S. (1999). Scenario building: A suitable method for strategic property planning? Property Management Bradford, 18(2), 127–144.
Ringland, G. (1998). Scenario planning: Managing for the future. New York: John Wiley.
Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 34–55.
Saarloos, D., Arentze, T., Borgers, A., & Timmermans, H. (2005). A multiagent model for alternative plan generation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 32(4), 505–522.
Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1995). Scenario planning: A tool for strategic thinking. Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 25–40.
Sun, Z. L., Deal, B., & Pallathucheril, V. G. (2009). The land-use evolution and impact assessment model: A comprehensive urban planning support system. URISA Journal, 21(1), 57–68.
Tian, L., & Shen, T. (2011). Evaluation of plan implementation in the transitional China: A case of Guangzhou city master plan. Cities, 28(1), 11–27.
Visser, H., & de Nijs, T. (2006). The map comparison kit. Environmental Modelling & Software, 21, 346–358.
Ward, D. P., & Murray, A. T. (1999). An optimized cellular automata approach for sustainable urban development in rapidly urbanizing regions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 7(5), 235–250.
White, R., Engelen, G., & Uijee, I. (1997). The use of constrained cellular automata for high-resolution modelling of urban land-use dynamics. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24, 323–343.
White, R., Straatman, B., & Engelen, G. (2004). Planning scenario visualization and assessment – a cellular automata based integrated spatial decision support system. In M. F. Goodchild, D. G. Janelle, & Z. G. Shrore (Eds.), Spatially integrated social science (pp. 420–442). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wu, F. (1998). Simland: A prototype to simulate land conversion through the integrated GIS and CA with AHP-derived transition rules. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12(1), 63–82.
Wu, F. (2002). Calibration of stochastic cellular automata: The application to rural–urban land conversions. International journal of Geographical Information Science, 16(8), 795–818.
Yang, Z., Cai, J., Ottens, H. F. L., & Sliuzas, R. (2013). Beijing: City profile. Cities, 31, 491–506.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Long, Y., Shen, Z. (2015). Target or Dream? Examining the Possibility of Implementing Planned Urban Forms Using a Constrained Cellular Automata Model. In: Geospatial Analysis to Support Urban Planning in Beijing. GeoJournal Library, vol 116. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19342-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19342-7_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19341-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19342-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)