Abstract
The primary objective when treating the non-vital or exposed pulp in the primary dentition is to maintain the tooth until it would normally exfoliate and preserve the developing dental arches. A pulpotomy involves the removal of the coronal pulp tissue, and the remaining tissue has been treated with a variety of different medications or procedures. Treatments that have been used for primary teeth pulps include medications formocresol, glutaraldehyde, calcium hydroxide, ferric sulfate, and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and electrosurgery. This chapter will discuss the use of lasers as an alternative to both chemically prepared pulpotomies and electrosurgery. There have been significant advances in the prevention of dental caries and conservative treatment of caries in the primary dentition; however, there still remains the necessity to treat the pulp of primary teeth when the pulp tissue is compromised due to mechanical exposures and when there is reversible pulpitis due to caries, pulpal death due to caries, and trauma to avoid the development of malocclusions from loss of space for the erupting permanent tooth.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Pediatr Dent. Guideline on Pulp Therapy for Primary and Immature Permanent Teeth. Reference Manual. 34(6) 12/13:222–9.
Buckley JP. The chemistry of pulp decomposition with rational treatment for this condition and its sequelae. J Am Dent Assoc. 1904;3:764.
Sweet CA. Procedure for the treatment of exposed and pulpless deciduous teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1930;17:1150–3.
Ibricevic H. Al-Jame Qumasha: Ferric Sulfate as pulpotomy agent in primary teeth: twenty month clinical follow-up. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2000;24(4):269–72.
Eldeman E, Holan G, Fuks AB. Mineral trioxide aggregate vs formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: a preliminary report. Pediatr Dent. 2001;23(1):15–8.
Dean JA, Mack RB, Fulkerson BT, Sanders BJ. Comparison of electrical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2002;12(3):177–82.
Fuks A. Pulp therapy for the primary and young permanent dentitions. Dent Clin North Am. 2000;44(3):571–96, vii.
Qudeimat MA, Al-Saieh FA, AL-Oari Q, Omar R. Restorative decisions for deep proximal carious lesions in primary molars. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2007;8:37–42.
Cioll JA. Indirect pulp capping and primary teeth: is the primary tooth pulpotomy out of date? Pediatr Dent. 2008;30:192–6.
Fuks A. Vital pulp therapy with new materials for primary teeth: new directions and treatment perspectives. J Endod. 2008;34(7 Suppl):S18–24. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.031. Review.
Farooq CA, Coll J, Kuwabara A, Sheldon P. Success rates of formocresol pulpotomy and indirect pulp treatment of deep dentinal caries in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22:278–86.
Straffon LH, Loos P. The indirect pulp cap: a review and commentary. Isr J Dent Sci. 2000;17:7–14.
Marchi JJ, de Araujo FB, Froner AM, Straffon LH, Nor JE. Indirect pulp capping in the primary dentition: a 4-year follow-up study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2006;31:68–71.
Cox CF, Kim KM, Stevenson 3rd RG, Hafez AA. Histological evaluation of a self-priming etchant adhesive system. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2003;8 Suppl:17–20; quiz 61.
Teixeira HM, Do Nascimento AB, Hebling J, De Souza Costa CA. In vivo evaluation of the biocompatibility of three current bonding agents. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33(7):542–50.
Fuks AB. Pulp therapy for the primary dentition. In: Pediatric dentistry: infancy through adolescence. St. Louis. Mo: Elsevier; 2005. 11830.
Wahl P, Andrews T. Isolation: a look at the differences and benefits of rubber dam and isolite. Endo Pract. 2010;3(2):52–5.
Pashley EL, Myers DR, Pashley DH, Whithford GM. Systemic distribution of 14C-formaldehyde from formocresol-treated pulpotomy sites. J Dent Res. 1980;59:602–8.
Lewis B, Chestner SB. Formaldehyde in dentistry: a review of mutagenic and carcinogenic potential. J Am Dent Assoc. 1981;103:429–31.
Goldmacher VS, Thilley WG. Formaldehyde is mutagenic for cultured human cells. Mutat Res. 1983;116:417–22.
Judd PL, Kenny DJ. Formocresol concerns: a review. J Can Dent Assoc. 1987;53:401–4.
Olivi G, Margolis F, Genovese MD. Laser pediatric dentistry: a user’s guide. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing; 2011. p. 93–7. ch.8.
Olivi G, Genovese MD. Laser restorative dentistry in children and adolescents. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2011;12(2):68–78.
Olivi G, Caprioglio C, Genovese MD. Lasers in dental traumatology. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2010;11(2):71–6.
Olivi G, Genovese MD. Erbium chromium laser in pulp capping treatment. J Oral Laser Appl. 2006;6(4):291–9.
Olivi G, Genovese MD, Maturo P, Docimo R. Pulp capping: advantages of using laser technology. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2007;8(2):89–95.
Moritz A, Schoop U, Goharkhay K, Sperr W. Advantages of a pulsed CO2 laser in direct pulp capping: long term in vivo study. Lasers Surg Med. 1998;22:288–93.
Moritz A, Schoop U, Goharkhay K, Sperr W. The CO2 laser as an aid in direct pulp capping. J Endod. 1998;24(4):248–51.
Santucci PJ. Dycal versus Nd:YAG laser and Vitrebond for direct pulp capping in permanent teeth. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1999;17:69–75.
Jayawardena JA, Kato J, Moriya K, Takagi Y. Pulpal response to exposure with Er:YAG laser. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathos Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;91:222–9.
Todea C, Kerezsi C, Balabuc C, Calniceanu M, Filip L. Pulp capping-from conventional to laser-assisted therapy (I). J Oral Laser Appl. 2008;8:71–82.
Todea C, Kerezsi C, Balabuc C, Calniceanu M, Filip L. Pulp capping-from conventional to laser-assisted therapy (II). J Oral Laser Appl. 2008;8:147–55.
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, Reference Manual 2013. Policy on the use of lasers for pediatric dental patients V 35/NO 6 13/14:75–7.
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, Reference Manual 2005–2006, Clinical Guidelines. 130–4.
Holan D, Eidelman E, Fuks A. Long term evaluation of pulpotomy in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate or formocresol. Pediatr Dent. 2005;27:2.
Malekafzali B, Shekarchi F, Asgary S. Treatment outcomes of pulpotomy in primary molars using two endodontic biomaterials. A 2-year randomized clinical trial. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2001;12(3):189–93.
Myers TD, Myers WD, Stone RM. First soft tissue study utilizing a pulsed Nd:YAG dental laser. Northwest Dent. 1989;68(2):14–7.
Jukić S, Anić I, Koba K, Najzar-Fleger D, Matsumoto K. The effect of pulpotomy using CO2 and Nd:YAG lasers on dental pulp tissue. Int Endod J. 1997;30(3):175–80.
Liu H, Yan MM, Zhao EY, Chen L, Liu HW. Preliminary report on the effect of Nd: YAG laser irradiation on canine tooth pulps. Chin J Dent Res. 2000;3(4):63–5.
Kimura Y, Yonaga K, Yokoyama K, Watanabe H, Wang X, Matsumoto K. Histopathological changes in dental pulp irradiated by Er:YAG laser: a preliminary report on laser pulpotomy. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2003;21(6):345–50.
Furze H, Furze M. Pulpotomy with laser in primary and young permanent teeth. J Oral Laser Appl. 2006;6(1):53–8.
Wilkerson MK, Hill SD, Arcoria CJ. Effects of the argon laser on primary tooth pulpotomies in swine. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1996;14:37–42.
Liu JF, Chen LR, Chao SY. Laser pulpotomy of primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 1999;21(2):128–9.
Liu JF. Effects of Nd:YAG laser pulpotomy on human primary molars. J Endod. 2006;32(5):404–7.
Odabas ME, Bodur H, Bari E, Demir C. Clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic evaluation of Nd:YAG laser pulpotomy on human primary teeth. J Endod. 2007;33:415–21.
Shoji S, Nakamura M, Horiuchi H. Histopathological changes in dental pulp irradiated by CO2 laser: a preliminary report on laser pulpotomy. J Endod. 1985;11:379–84.
Elliott RD, Roberts MW, Burkes J, Phillips C. Evaluation of the carbon dioxide laser on vital human primary pulp tissue. Pediatr Dent. 1999;21:327–31.
Pescheck A, Pescheck B, Moritz A. Pulpotomy of primary molars with the use of a carbon dioxide laser: results of a long-term in vivo study. J Oral Laser Appl. 2002;2:165–9.
Fitzpatrick RE, Goldman MP, Ruiz-Esparza J. Clinical advantages of the CO2 laser superpulsed mode. Treatment of verruca vulgaris, seborrheic keratoses, lentigines, and actinic cheilitis. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1994;20:449–56.
Kimura Y, Yonaga K, Yokoyama K, Watanabe H, Wang X, Matsumoto K. Histological changes in the dental pulp irradiated by Er:YAG laser: a preliminary report on laser pulpotomy. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2003;21:345–50.
Huth KC, Paschos E, Hajek-Al-Khatar N, et al. Effectiveness of 4 pulpotomy techniques—randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res. 2005;84:1144–8.
Henson T, Church A. Recall evaluation of primary pulp therapy using a dental laser. Personal communications of unpublished paper. 29 May 2008.
Kotlow L. Use of an Er:YAG laser fro pulpotomies in vital and nonvital primary teeth. J Laser Dent. 2008;16(2):75–9.
Mareddy A, Mallikarjun Shanthala B, Shetty P, Narasimha V, Chandru T. Histological evaluation of diode laser pulpotomy in dogs. J Oral Laser Appl. 2010;10(1):7–16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kotlow, L. (2016). Pulp Therapy for Primary Teeth. In: Olivi, G., De Moor, R., DiVito, E. (eds) Lasers in Endodontics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19327-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19327-4_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19326-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19327-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)