Mechanism of Electron Radiation Induced Loss of the “Panda” Type Polarization-Maintaining Optical Fibers

  • Hai LiuEmail author
  • Hongbao Sun
Conference paper
Part of the Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings book series (ASSSP, volume 47)


Evolution and mechanism of the induced loss of the 1310 nm working-wavelength “Panda” type quartz PM fiber irradiated by the 1 MeV and 170 keV electrons respectively were experimentally investigated using electron accelerator. The results show that, fiber loss exhibits an exponential increase with increasing radiation fluence, which is higher under low-energy electrons than under high-energy electrons. The irradiated quartz fibers show an annealing effect. The restored loss of the fiber irradiated by high-energy electron is higher than that by low-energy electron. The radiation induced loss of quartz fiber has two mechanisms of Si–OH absorption and H2 absorption. Under lower electron energy, the energy deposition of fiber core is in majority leading to more radiation defects forming while the loss is mainly controlled by Si–OH. In the case of the fiber subjected to high-energy electron radiation, the absorbed dose of fiber core is relatively low, which is dominated by H2 absorption. Hydrogen that is involved in both mechanisms is generated by radiation induced degradation of polymer coating and diffuses into fiber core.


Polarization-maintaining optical fiber Radiation effect Induced optical loss Infrared absorption Si–OH defect 


  1. 1.
    Friebele EJ, Askins CG, Miller GA (2004) Optical fiber sensors for spacecraft: applications and challenges. The International Society for Optical Engineering, Denver, CO, pp 120–131Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    John S (1987) Strong localization of photons in certain disordered dielectric super lattices. Phys Rev Lett 58(23):2486–2489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xu J, Zhao SH, Hou R, Yang SS, Zhang TP, Ni YH, Wu JL, Li YJ (2010) Gamma-ray radiation-induced damage to silicon single-mode fiber. Optik 121(21):1998–2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tomashuk AL, Golant KM, Dianov EM, Medvedkov OI, Plaksin OA, Stepanov VA, Stepanov PA, Demenkov PV, Chernov VM, Klyamkin SN (2000) Radiation-induced absorption and luminescencein specially hardened large-core silica optical fibers. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 47(3):693–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang H-C, Liu H, Xue H-J, Qiao W-Q, He S-Y (2012) Effects of 160 keV electron irradiation on the optical properties and microstructure of “Panda” type polarization-maintaining optical fibers. Opt Commun 285:4779–4784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brichard B, Tomashuk AL, Bogatyrjov VA, Fernandez AF, Klyamkin SN, Girard S, Berghmans F (2007) Reduction of the radiation-induced absorption in hydrogenated pure silica core fibers irradiated in situ with gamma-rays. J Non Cryst Solids 353:466–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Friebele EJ, Ginther RJ, Sigel GH (1974) Radiation protection of fiber optic materials: effects of oxidation and reduction. Appl Phys Lett 24:412–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deparis O, Griscom DL, Mégret P, Decréton M, Blondel M (1997) Influence of the cladding thickness on the evolution of the NBOHC band in optical fibers exposed to gamma radiations. J Non Cryst Solids 216(1997):124–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Itoh H, Ohmori Y, Nakahara M (1986) Gamma-ray radiation effects on hydroxyl absorption increase in optical fibers. J Lightwave Technol LT-4(4):473CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Materials Science and EngineeringHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations