Skip to main content

A Non-arbitrary Method for Estimating IT Business Function Recovery Complexity via Software Complexity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 211))

Abstract

The goal of the present paper is to introduce a new model for estimating business function recovery complexity in order to predict reasonable recovery timeframes in case of an unexpected information system failure. The method has its roots in the Use Case Points approach, which is a broadly tested tool for software complexity estimation. The current paper illustrates the pure theoretical form of the new model as well as the mapping between software complexity and business function recovery complexity. The method includes 3 categories of factors which affect the recovery procedure and are weighted according to the Rank Order Centroid (ROC) approach of assigning weights. The method is entitled Business Continuity Points. The idea behind the development of the new method is the establishment of a standard approach for implementing efficient time management regarding business function recovery. The estimated recovery time depends on the impact of technical, environmental and unexpected factors. Each function’s Recovery Time should be compared with the Recovery Time Objective (RTO) and Maximum Accepted Outage (MAO) values as they are proposed by business continuity and IT experts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Classification can also be performed for a single business process according to the number of Activities inside the process.

References

  1. Martin, E.W., Brown, C.V., Hoffer, J.A., Perkins, W.C., Dehayes, D.W.: Managing Information Technology: What Managers Need to Know, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rao, L., McNaughton, M., Osei-Bryson, K.-M., Haye, M.: The role of ontologies in disaster recovery planning. In: AMCIS 2009 Proceedings, Paper 713 (2009). http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2009/713

  3. Miller, H.E., Engemann, K.J.: Using analytical methods in business continuity planning. In: Engemann, K.J., Gil-Lafuente, A.M., Merigó, J.M. (eds.) MS 2012. LNBIP, vol. 115, pp. 2–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Karner, G.: Resource estimation for objectory projects. In: Systems SF AB (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Business Standard Institute: BS ISO 22301:2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Engemann, K.J., Henderson, D.M.: Business Continuity and Risk Management: Essentials of Organizational Resilience. Rothstein Associates, Brookfield (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Information And Technology Services (ITS): Disaster Recovery/Business Continuity, University of Michigan (2014). http://www.mais.umich.edu

  8. Gibson, D.: Managing Risks in Information Systems. Jones & Bartlett Learning, Burlington (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. National Institute of Standards and Technology-U.S. Department of Commerce: Contigency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems, p. 16 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Snedaker, S.: Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Planning for IT Professionals. Elsevier Inc., Burlington (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Banerjee, G: Use Case Points -An Estimation Approach (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kusumoto, S., Matukawa, F., Inoue, K.: Estimating effort by use case points: method, tool and case study. In: 10th International Symposium on Software Metrics. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ochodek, M., Nawrocki, J., Kwarciak, K.: Simplifying effort estimation based on use case points. J. Inf. Softw. Technol. 53, 200–213 (2011). Elsevier

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Barron, F.H., Barrett, B.E.: Decision quality using ranked attribute weights. Int. Manag. Sci. 42, 1515–1523 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bagla, V., Gupta, A., Kukreja, D.: A qualitative assessment of educational software. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 36, 1–7 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Caelli, W.J., Kwok, L.-F., Longley, D.: A business continuity management simulator. In: Rannenberg, K., Varadharajan, V., Weber, C. (eds.) SEC 2010. IFIP AICT, vol. 330, pp. 9–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Laird, M.L., Brennan, M.C.: Software measurement and estimation- a practical approach. IEEE Computer Society, Hoboken (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Gruhn, V., Laue R.: Complexity metrics for business process models. In: 9th International Conference on Business Information Systems

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ha, B.-H., Reijers, H.A., Bae, J., Bae, H.: An approximate analysis of expected cycle time in business process execution. In: Eder, J., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2006. LNCS, vol. 4103, pp. 65–74. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The current work is supported by the SGS Project with the Number 21079, from Technical University of Liberec.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Athanasios Podaras .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Podaras, A. (2015). A Non-arbitrary Method for Estimating IT Business Function Recovery Complexity via Software Complexity. In: Aveiro, D., Pergl, R., Valenta, M. (eds) Advances in Enterprise Engineering IX. EEWC 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 211. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19297-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19297-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19296-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19297-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics