Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Space and Society ((SPSO))

  • 1994 Accesses

Abstract

Space architecture as a discipline is relatively new, but it fills a gap between the engineering approach to design habitats and other space facilities for humans, and the complexity of human factors oriented design—including personal psychology, creativity, and non-work related activities. In order to successfully fill that gap, space architecture needs to be taught academically. This chapter talks about known and potential approaches and methods, drawing examples from current space architecture programs and classes, and representative projects. The authors consider that space architecture approaches to design and planning are important to be introduced to students who are coming from the diverse backgrounds of engineering and architecture. Other disciplines may benefit as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Advanced Concepts Office at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center, Space Architect.

  2. 2.

    A selection of schools and universities offering courses on Space Architecture are listed in the Appendix.

  3. 3.

    Strategic Planning & Project Formulation, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Space Architect.

  4. 4.

    Major terms that are used throughout this book are listed in the Appendix, in the Glossary section of the Appendix.

  5. 5.

    Note: The authors highly recommend the inclusion of interdisciplinary team-oriented working processes at the university level.

  6. 6.

    INCOSE—International Council on System Engineering. http://www.incose.org/AboutSE/WhatIsSE.

  7. 7.

    ACSA—Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture. http://www.acsa-arch.org/about/about-acsa.

  8. 8.

    The original spiral model was developed by the software engineer Barry Boehm in 1986. Since then a number of variations do exist. (Boehm Barry. 1986. A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement.)

  9. 9.

    Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture, Cullen College of Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.

  10. 10.

    Studio directed by: Dr. Häuplik-Meusburger Sandra and DI Lu San-Hwan; External project evaluation: Dr. Marc M. Cohen; Students: Abele M., Badzak M., Benesch O., Czech M., Demirtas T., Galonja D., Hengl K., Heshmatpour C., Khouni A., Klaus J., Kolaritsch A., Krljes D., Küpeli B., Lang E., Lazarova Y., Lukacs D., Milchram T.,  Mörtl C., Mulic A., Nagy P., Nanu A., Pluch K., Rossetti V., Shi Y., Siedler D., Stefan K., Steinschifter M.; Invited Space Experts: M. Aguzzi, W. Balogh, W. Bein, M. Cohen, S. Fairburn, N. Frischauf, B. Foing, M. Gitsch, G. Grömer, M. Hajek, J. Huber, Kabru, O. Lamborelle, R. Peldszus, T. Rousek, D. Schubert, M. Schultes, U. Schmitzer, G. Thiele, F. Viehböck, A. Vogler.

  11. 11.

    Further Reading: Sherwood, Brent. 2012. Technology Investment Agendas to Expand Human Space Futures, Proceedings of the AIAA Space 2012 Conference and Exposition (Pasadena), American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (Reston), 2012, AIAA 2012-5131.

  12. 12.

    Further Reading: Sherwood, Brent. 2012. Space Architecture for Industrial-Scale Space Solar Power, AIAA 42nd International Conference on Environmental Systems (San Diego), American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (Reston), 2012, AIAA 2012-3574.

  13. 13.

    See also: Sherwood. Brent. 2011. Inhabiting the Solar System, Open Engineering, 1(1), 2011, pp 38–58, DOI: 10.2478/s13531-011-0004-y. Springer, March 2011.

References

  • ACSA, Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture. 2015. http://www.acsa-arch.org/resources/guide-to-architectural-education/overview/architectural-education. Accessed January 2015.

  • Ahlstrom, Vicki, et al. 2003. Human Factors Design Standard (HFDS) DOT/FAA/CT-03/05HF-STD-001. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Technical Center. Atlantic City International Airport, NJ 08405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannova, Olga, and Bell, Larry. 2011. Space architecture education as part of aerospace engineering. Acta Astronautica Journal 69: 1143–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bienhoff, Dallas. 2009. Minimum functionality habitation element, Boeing team. Retrieved from U.S. Chamber of Commerce Programmatic Workshop on NASA Lunar Surface Systems Concepts. http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/315852main_Boeing_MFHE_USCOC_Bienhoff.pdf. Accessed March 2009.

  • Brown, Charles D. 2002. Elements of spacecraft design. Reston: AIAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Ni-Bin. 2011. Systems analysis for sustainable engineering: Theory and applications (green manufacturing & systems engineering). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Marc M. 1996. Mars mission design evaluation criteria. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Environmental Systems, Monterey, California, SAE 961467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, Ed. 2007. Introduction to system architecture, Rev 2.0, 5 January 2007. Architecture to value. Massachusetts: Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, Nigel. 1993. Science and design methodology: A review. Research in Engineering Design 5(2): 63–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, Michael. 2013. Organising, valuing and improving the engineering design process. Journal of Engineering Design 24(7): 524–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Transportation. 1996. HFDG, Human Factors Design Guide. Springfield. National Technical Information Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duerk, Donna P. 1993. Architectural programming. Information management for design. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Brand N. 2014. Space architecture. The role, work and aptitude. AIAA Space and Astronautics Forum and Exposition, 2014–4404, 4–7 August 2014, San Diego, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groemer G, Soucek A, Frischauf N, et al. 2014. The MARS 2013 Analog Mission. Astrobiology 360–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Häuplik-Meusburger, Sandra, and Lu San-Hwan. 2012. Destination Moon—Future living and working spaces. VUT Vienna. http://issuu.com/hochbau2/docs/dm_booklet_web.

  • Häuplik-Meusburger, Sandra, Lu San-Hwan, and Petrova Polina. 2013. Deployable emergency MARS. VUT Vienna. http://issuu.com/hochbau2/docs/mm_booklet_issuu.

  • IAA. 2013. Position paper: The architecture of space: Tools for development in the 21st century. International Academy of Astronautics. https://shop.iaaweb.org/?q=node/4406.

  • International Council on INCOSE. 2015. What is systems engineering? http://www.incose.org/AboutSE/WhatIsSE. Accessed February 2015.

  • Kanas, Nick, and Manzey, Dietrich. 2003. Space Psychology and Psychiatry. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesseler, Ernst, and Guenov Marin D. 2010. Advances in collaborative civil aeronautical multidisciplinary design optimization. Reston: AIAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossiakoff, Alexander, Sweet William, Seymour Samuel, et al. 2011. Principles and practice. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, John. 2009. Minimum functionality habitation element, ILC Dover team. Retrieved from U.S. Chamber of Commerce Programmatic Workshop on NASA Lunar Surface Systems Concepts. http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/315842main_MFHE_ILC_lin.pdf. Accessed March 2009.

  • Maier, Mark W., and Rechtin Eberhardt. 2000. The art of system architecting. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, T., T. Ender, and N. Bollweg. 2011. Collaborative development of design rules. 14th NDIA conference, 24–27 October 2011. Presentation #13176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelfelder, Diane P., McCarthy Natasha, and Goldberg David E. 2013. Philosophy and engineering: Reflections on practice, principles and process. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MIL-STD-1472D. 14 March 1989. Military Standard: Human engineering design criteria for military systems, equipment and facilities. Washington, DC: Department of Defense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rechtin, Eberhardt. 1991. Systems architecting: Creating and building complex systems. Prentice Hall PTR.

    Google Scholar 

  • SATC. 2002. The millennium charter. Space architecture mission statement. http://spacearchitect.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/The-Millennium-Charter.pdf. Accessed December 2014.

  • Sherwood, Brent. 2011. Comparing future options for human space Flight. Acta Astronautica 69: 346–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood, Brent. 2012. Decadal opportunities for space architects. Acta Astronautica 81: 600–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner Dan, Birt Joseph A., Snyder Michael, Duncanson James P. 1996. Human factors design guide for acquisition of commercial-off-the-shelf subsystems, non-developmental items, and developmental systems. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Häuplik-Meusburger .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Häuplik-Meusburger, S., Bannova, O. (2016). Approaches and Methods. In: Space Architecture Education for Engineers and Architects. Space and Society. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19279-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19279-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19278-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19279-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics