Advertisement

A First Step Toward a Possibilistic Swarm Multi-robot Task Allocation

  • José GuerreroEmail author
  • Óscar Valero
  • Gabriel Oliver
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9094)

Abstract

The task allocation problem is one of the main issues in multi-robot systems. Typical ways to address this problem are based on Swarm Intelligence. One of them is the so-called Response Threshold Method. In the aforementioned method every robot has associated a task response threshold and a task stimuli in such a way that the robot’s probability of executing a certain task depends on both factors. On of the advantage of the aforesaid method is given by the fact that the original problem is treated from a distributed mode which, at the same time, means a very low computational requirements. However, the Response Threshold Method cannot be extended in a natural way to allocate more than two tasks when the theoretical basis is provided by probability theory. Motivated by this fact, this paper leaves the probabilistic approach to the problem and takes a first step towards a possibilistic theoretical approach in order to treat successfully the multi-robot task allocation problem when more than two tasks must be performed. As an example of application, an scenario where each robot task stimuli only depends on the distance between tasks is studied and the convergence of the system to an stable state is shown.

Keywords

Multi-robot Possibility theory Swarm intelligence Task allocation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Agassounon, W., Martinoli, A.: Efficiency and robustness of threshold-based distributed allocation algorithms in multi-agent systems. In: 1st Int. Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agents Systems, Bolonia, Italy, pp. 1090–1097, July 2002Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Avrachenkov, K., Sanchez, E.: Fuzzy markov chainsand decision making. Fuzzy Optimization and Decisoin Maing 1, 143–159 (2002)zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bonabeau, E., Sobkowski, A., Theraulaz, G., Deneubourg, J.-L.: Adaptive task allocation inspired by a model of division of labor in social insects. In: Lundh, D., Olsson, B., Narayanan, A. (eds.) Bio Computation and Emergent Computing, pp. 36–45. World Scientific (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dubois, H.P.D.: Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications. Academic Press (1980)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duan, J.: The transitive clousure, convegence of powers and adjoint of generalized fuzzy matrices. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 145, 301–311 (2004)zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gerkey, B.P.: On Multi-Robot Task Allocation. PhD thesis, Center of Robotics and Embedded Systems, University of Southern California, Los Ángeles, USA, August 2003Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gerkey, B.P., Mataric, M.: Sold!: Auction methods for multi-robot coordination. IEEE Transactions on robotics and Automation, Special Issue on Multi-robot Systems 18(5), 758–768 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gerkey, B.P., Mataric, M.: A formal analysis and taxonomy of task allocation in multi-robot systems. International Journal of Robotics Research 23(9), 939–954 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guerrero, J., Oliver, G.: Swarm-like methodologies for executing tasks with deadlines. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 68(1), 3–19 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heap, B., Pagnucco, M.: Repeated sequential single-cluster auctions with dynamic tasks for multi-robot task allocation with pickup and delivery. In: Klusch, M., Thimm, M., Paprzycki, M. (eds.) MATES 2013. LNCS, vol. 8076, pp. 87–100. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kalra, N., Martinoli, A.: A comparative study of market-based and threshold-based task allocation. In: 8th International Symposium on Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems, pp. 91–102, Minneapolis, USA, July 2006Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kemeny, J., Snell, J.: Finite Markov Chains. Springer-Verlag (1960)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim, M., Baik, H., Lee, S.: Response threshold model based uav search planning and task allocation. Journal of Intellent Robotics Systems 75, 625–640 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kuhn, H.W.: The hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 2(1), 83–97 (1955)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Navarro, I., Matía, F.: An introduction to swarm robotics. ISRN Robotics, 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yang, Y., Zhou, C., Tin, Y.: Swarm robots task allocation based on response threshold model. In: International Conference on Autonomous Robots and Agents, pp. 171–176, Willengton, New Zeland, February 2009Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zadeh, L.: Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1, 3–28 (1978)zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mathematical and Computer Science DepartmentUniversity of the Balearic IslandsPalma de MallorcaSpain

Personalised recommendations