Abstract
Urinary incontinence (UI) is a “storage symptom.” The most recommended definition of incontinence in men, as well as in women, is that of the fifth International Consultation on Incontinence (ICS): “the complaint of any involuntary loss of urine” [1]. This definition is suitable for epidemiological studies of male incontinence, but in clinical practice it must be emphasized that: the loss of urine should be objectively demonstrable, it should happen in socially unaccepted time and place (“social or hygienic problem”), and it should be expelled from an orthotopic anatomically intact urinary system (e.g., urinary leakage from a ureteroileocutaneous urinary diversion is not considered a form of incontinence).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Incontinence (2013) 5th international consultation on incontinence, 5th edn. Paris February, 2012
Thom D (1998) Variations in estimated of urinary incontinence prevalence in the community: effects of differences in definitions, population characteristics, and study type. J Am Geriatr Soc 46:473
Herzog AR, Fultz NH (1990) Epidemiology of urinary incontinence: prevalence, incidence and correlates in community populations. Urology Suppl 36:2
Ueda T, Tamaki M, Kageyama S, Yoshimura N, Yoshida O (2000) Urinary incontinence among community dwelling people aged 40 years or older in Japan: prevalence, risk factors, knowledge and self-perception. Int J Urol 7:95
Maral I, Ozkardes H, Peskircioglu L, Bumin MA (2001) Prevalence of stress urinary incontinence in both sexes at or after age 15 years: a cross-sectional study. J Urol 165:408
Boyle P, Boyle P, Robertson C, Mazzetta C, Keech M, Hobbs FD, Fourcade R, Kiemeney L, Lee C, The UrEpik Study Group (2003) The prevalence of male urinary incontinence in four centres: the UREPIK study. BJU Int 92:943
Diokno AC, Estanol MVC, Ibrahim IA, Balasubamanian M (2007) Prevalence of urinary incontiennce in community dwelling men: a cross sectional nationwide epidemiology survey. Int Urol Nephrol 39:129–136
Landi F, Cesari M, Russo A, Onder G, Lattansio F, Bernabe R, Silvernet-HC Study group (2003) Potentially reversible risk factors and urinary incontinence in frail older people living in community. Age Ageing 32:194–199
Muscatello DJ, Rissel C, Szonyi G (2001) Urinary symptoms and incontinence in an urban community prevalence and associated factors in older men and women. Int Med J 31:151–160
Nelson RL, Furner SE (2005) Risk factors for the development of fecal and urinary incontinence in Wisconsin nursing home residents. Maturitas 52:26–31
Roberto Carone, La teoria “uretro-centrica”, alcune riflessioni su un possibile cambiamento di paradigma. http://www.siud.it/altreimg/La_Teoria_Uretro-Centrica.pdf
Jackson AB, Dijkers M, Devivo MJ, Poczatek RB (2004) A demographic profile of new traumatic spinal cord injuries: change and stability over 30 years. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:1740–1748
Ditunno JF Jr, Young W, Donovan WH, Creasey G (1994) The international standards booklet for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. Am Spinal Injury Assoc Paraplegia 32:70–80
Madersbacher H (1990) The various types of neurogenic bladder dysfunction: an update of current therapeutic concepts. Paraplegia 28:217–229
Stoehrer M, Blok B, Castro-Diaz D, Chartier-Kastler E, Del Popolo G, Kramerf G, Pannek J, Radziszewski P, Wyndaele J-J (2009) EAU guidelines on neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. Eur Urol 56:81–88
Hunskaar S (1992) One hundred and fifty men with urinary incontinence. I. Demography and medical history. Scand J Prim Health Care 10(1):21–25
Ficarra V et al (2009) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 55:1037–1063
Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):405–417
Thompson JE et al (2014) Superior quality of life and improved surgical margins Are achievable with robotic radical prostatectomy after a long learning curve: a prospective single-surgeon study of 1552 consecutive cases. Eur Urol 65:521–551
Resnick MJ et al (2013) Long-term functional outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 368(5):436–445
Filiadis I, Adamopoulos V, Konstandinidis E (2007) Modification of retropubic adenomectomy: improved hemostasis and outcome. Int Urol Nephrol 39:169–172
Desai MM et al (2009) Single-port transvesical enucleation of the prostate: a clinical report of 34 cases. BJU Int 105:1296–1300
Tascı AI, Ilbey YO, Tugcu V, Cicekler O, Cevik C, Zoroglu F (2011) Transurethral resection of the prostate with monopolar resectoscope: single-surgeon experience and long-term results of after 3589 procedures. Urology 78(5):1151–1155
Pereira-Correia JA et al (2012) GreenLight HPS ™ 120-W laser vaporization vs transurethral resection of the prostate (<60 mL): a 2-year randomized double-blind prospective urodynamic investigation. BJU Int 110:1184–1189
McConnell JD, Barry MJ, Bruskewitz RC et al (1994) Benign prostatic hyperplasia: diagnosis and treatment. Clinical practice guidelines, No. 8. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public health service, US department of Health and Human Services. Report No.: AHPCR Publication No. 94-0582
Ter-Grigorian AA et al (2013) Urogenital disorders after pelvic ring injuries. Cent European J Urol 66:352–356
Pavelka T et al (2010) Urogenital trauma associated with pelvic ring fractures. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 77(1):18–23
Herschorn S et al (2010) Surgical treatment of stress incontinence in Mes. Neurourol Urodyn 29:179–190
Abrams P, Blaivas JG, Stanton SL, Andersen JT (1988) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function. The International Continence Society Committee on Standardisation of Terminology. Scand J Urol Nephrol 114:S5±19
Smither AR, Guralnick ML, Davis NB, See WA (2007) Quantifying the natural history of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence using objective pad test data. BMC Urol 7:2
O’Sullivan R, Karantanis E, Stevermuer TL, Allen W, Moore KH (2004) Definition of mild, moderate and severe incontinence on the 24-hour pad test. BJOG 111:859–862
Twiss C, Fleischmann N, Nitti VW (2005) Correlation of abdominal leak point pressure with objective incontinence severity in men with post-radical prostatectomy stress incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 24:207–210
Carone R, Vercelli D. Urodinamica clinica, vol. 1 Tecniche, Cap. 12 Videourodinamica, Società italiana di Urodinamica
Comiter CV, Sullivan MP, Yalla SV (1997) Retrograde leak point pressure for evaluating postradical prostatectomy incontinence. Urology 49(2):231–236
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bodo, G., Ammirati, E. (2015). Incontinence: Definition and Classification. In: Del Popolo, G., Pistolesi, D., Li Marzi, V. (eds) Male Stress Urinary Incontinence. Urodynamics, Neurourology and Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19252-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19252-9_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19251-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19252-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)