Skip to main content

A Tentative Approach for the Wadge-Wagner Hierarchy of Regular Tree Languages of Index [0, 2]

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems (DCFS 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9118))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 349 Accesses

Abstract

We provide a hierarchy of tree languages recognised by nondeterministic parity tree automata with priorities in \(\{0,1,2\}\), whose length exceeds the first fixed point of the \(\varepsilon \) operation (that itself enumerates the fixed points of \(x\mapsto \omega ^x\)). We conjecture that, up to Wadge equivalence, it exhibits all regular tree languages of index \([0,2]\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We emphasize that this is done without any determinacy principle. In particular, we do not require \(\mathbf {\Delta }^{1}_{2}\)-determinacy.

  2. 2.

    Not to be mistaken with an \(\varepsilon \)-move.

  3. 3.

    A pointclass is a collections of subsets of a topological space that is closed under continuous preimages.

  4. 4.

    This is in general stronger than the usual \(A<_{W}B\) if and only if \(A\le _{W}B\) and \(B\not \le _{W}A\), but the two definitions coincide when the classes considered are determined.

  5. 5.

    A player in charge of in a conciliatory game is like a player in charge of \(L(\mathcal {A})\), but with the extra possibility at any moment of the play to reach a definitively rejecting position.

  6. 6.

    \( \varepsilon = {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} -1 &{}\text { if } d_{c}(L)<\omega ; \\ 0 &{}\text { if } d_{c}(L) = \beta + n \text { and } {{\mathrm{cof}}}(\beta ) = \omega _{1}; \\ 1 &{}\text { if } d_{c}(L) = \beta + n \text { and } {{\mathrm{cof}}}(\beta ) = \omega . \end{array}\right. } \).

  7. 7.

    Another way to characterise \(\varphi _{2}(0)\) is to remember that an ordinal is the set of its predecessors and notice that a nonzero ordinal is of the form respectively \(\omega ^\alpha \) iff it is closed under addition and \(\varepsilon _\alpha \) iff it is closed under \(x\longmapsto \omega ^x\). Then \(\varphi _{2}(0)\) is the first non null ordinal closed under \(x\longmapsto \varepsilon _x\) as well as \(x\longmapsto \omega ^x\) and \(x,y\longmapsto x+y\).

  8. 8.

    Notice that we have \({\alpha _i}={\left( \omega ^{\omega }\right) }^{\alpha _i}\iff {\alpha _i}={\omega ^{\alpha _i}}\).

References

  1. Andretta, A., Louveau, A.: Wadge degrees and pointclasses. In: Kechris, A.S., Löwe, B., Steel, J.R. (eds.) Wadge Degrees and Projective Ordinals: The Cabal Seminar, vol. II, pp. 3–23. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arnold, A., Duparc, J., Murlak, F., Niwiński, D.: On the topological complexity of tree languages. Logic Automata: Hist. Perspect. 2, 9–29 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arnold, A., Niwiński, D.: Rudiments of \(\mu \)-Calculus. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics. Elseiver, Amsterdam (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Duparc, J.: Wadge hierarchy and Veblen hierarchy, part I: Borel sets of finite rank. J. Symbolic Logic 66(1), 56–86 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Duparc, J., Murlak, F.: On the topological complexity of weakly recognizable tree languages. In: Csuhaj-Varjú, E., Ésik, Z. (eds.) FCT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4639, pp. 261–273. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Finkel, O., Simonnet, P.: On recognizable tree languages beyond the Borel hierarchy. Fundam. Informaticae 95(2–3), 287–303 (2009)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Rabin, M.O.: Decidability of second-order theories and automata on infinite trees. Trans. AMS 141, 1–23 (1969)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Wesep, R.: Wadge degrees and descriptive set theory. In: Kechris, A.S., Moschovakis, Y.N. (eds.) Cabal Seminar 76–77, pp. 151–170. Springer, Heidelberg (1978)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Wadge, W.W.: Reducibility and determinateness on the Baire space. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley (1984)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Fournier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Duparc, J., Fournier, K. (2015). A Tentative Approach for the Wadge-Wagner Hierarchy of Regular Tree Languages of Index [0, 2]. In: Shallit, J., Okhotin, A. (eds) Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems. DCFS 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9118. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19225-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19225-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19224-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19225-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics