Skip to main content

Field Methods and Data Issues

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Methods in Statistical Ecology ((MISE))

Abstract

As methods developers and data analysts, we often see data long after they have been collected. In some instances, no amount of clever analysis can retrieve a study that has fallen foul of poor field methods. In this chapter, we define what is meant by ‘poor field methods’, and by contrast, what constitutes ‘good’ field methods; and we describe means by which ‘poor’ field methods can be diagnosed and remedied before data collection is completed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alldredge, M. W., K. Pacifici, T. R. Simons, and K. H. Pollock (2008). A novel field evaluation of the effectiveness of distance and independent observer sampling to estimate aural avian detection probabilities. Journal of Applied Ecology 45, 1349–1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, E. F. and P. X. Quang (2009). A gamma-shaped detection function for line-transect surveys with mark-recapture and covariate data. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 14, 207–223.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, S. T. (2006). Point transect surveys for songbirds: robust methodologies. The Auk 123, 345–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, S. T., D. R. Anderson, K. P. Burnham, J. L. Laake, D. L. Borchers, and L. Thomas (2001). Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hiby, L. and P. Lovell (1998). Using aircraft in tandem formation to estimate abundance of harbour porpoise. Biometrics 54, 1280–1289.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Buckland, S.T., Rexstad, E.A., Marques, T.A., Oedekoven, C.S. (2015). Field Methods and Data Issues. In: Distance Sampling: Methods and Applications. Methods in Statistical Ecology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19219-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics