Abstract
The relationships between geomorphology and pedology can be analyzed from different perspectives: conceptual, methodological, and operational. Geopedology (1) is based on the conceptual relationships between geoform and soil which center on the earth’s epidermal interface, (2) is implemented using a variety of methodological modalities based on the three-dimensional concept of the geopedologic landscape, and (3) becomes operational primarily within the framework of soil inventory, which can be represented by a hierarchic scheme of activities. The approach focuses on the reading of the landscape in the field and from remote-sensed imagery to identify and classify geoforms, as a prelude to their mapping along with the soils they enclose and the interpretation of the genetic relationships between soils and geoforms. There is explicit emphasis on the geomorphic context as an essential factor of soil formation and distribution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Amiotti N, Blanco MC, Sanchez LF (2001) Complex pedogenesis related to differential aeolian sedimentation in microenvironments of the southern part of the semiarid region of Argentina. Catena 43:137–156
Arnold R, Schargel R (1978) Importance of geographic soil variability at scales of about 1: 25,000. Venezuelan examples. In: Drosdoff M, Daniels RB, Nicholaides III JJ (eds) Diversity of soils in the tropics. ASA special publication, 34. ASA, Madison, pp 45–66
Bocco G, Velázquez A, Mendoza ME, Torres MA, Torres A (1996) Informe final, subproyecto regionalización ecológica, proyecto de actualización del ordenamiento ecológico general del territorio del país. INE-SEMARNAP, México
Bregt AK, Bouma J, Jellineck M (1987) Comparison of thematic maps derived from a soil map and from kriging of point data. Geoderma 39:281–291
Buol SW, Hole FD, McCracken RJ, Southard RJ (1997) Soil genesis and classification, 4th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames
Campy M, Macaire JJ (1989) Géologie des formations superficielles. Géodynamique, faciès, utilisation. Masson, Paris
Esfandiarpoor Borujeni I, Salehi MH, Toomanian N, Mohammadi J, Poch RM (2009) The effect of survey density on the results of geopedological approach in soil mapping: a case study in the Borujen region, Central Iran. Catena 79:18–26
Esfandiarpoor Borujeni I, Mohammadi J, Salehi MH, Toomanian N, Poch RM (2010) Assessing geopedological soil mapping approach by statistical and geostatistical methods: a case study in the Borujen region, Central Iran. Catena 82:1–14
Farshad A, Shrestha DP, Moonjun R (2013) Do the emerging methods of digital soil mapping have anything to learn from the geopedologic approach to soil mapping or vice versa? In: Shahid SA, Taha FK, Abdelfattah MA (eds) Developments in soil classification, land use planning and policy implications: innovative thinking of soil inventory for land use planning and management of land resources. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 109–131
Fridland VM (1974) Structure of the soil mantle. Geoderma 12:35–41
Fridland VM (1976) Pattern of the soil cover. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem
Hall GF, Olson CG (1991) Predicting variability of soils from landscape models. In: Mausbach MJ, Wilding LP (eds) Spatial variabilities of soils and landforms. SSSA Special Publication, 28. SSSA, Madison, pp 9–24
Hengl T (2003) Pedometric mapping. Bridging the gaps between conventional and pedometric approaches. ITC dissertation 101, Enschede, The Netherlands
Hengl T, Rossiter DG (2003) Supervised landform classification to enhance and replace photo-interpretation in semi-detailed soil survey. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:1810–1822
Hole FD, Campbell JB (1985) Soil landscape analysis. Rowman & Allanheld, Totowa
Hole FD, Hironaka M (1960) An experiment in ordination of some soil profiles. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 24(4):309–312
Hudson BD (1992) The soil survey as paradigm-based science. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:836–841
Ibáñez JJ (1994) Evolution of fluvial dissection landscapes in Mediterranean environments: quantitative estimates and geomorphic, pedologic and phytocenotic repercussions. Z Geomorphol 38:105–119
IUSS (2007) World reference base for soil resources. World soil resources report 103. IUSS Working Group WRB/FAO, Rome
Jenny H (1941) Factors of soil formation. McGraw-Hill, New York
Kerry R, Oliver MA (2011) Soil geomorphology: identifying relations between the scale of spatial variation and soil processes using the variogram. Geomorphology 130:40–54
McBratney AB, de Gruijter JJ, Brus DJ (1992) Spatial prediction and mapping of continuous soil classes. Geoderma 54:39–64
McKenzie NJ, Gessler PE, Ryan PJ, O’Connell DA (2000) The role of terrain analysis in soil mapping. In: Wilson JP, Gallant JC (eds) Terrain analysis. Principles and applications. Wiley, New York, pp 245–265
Metternicht G, Zinck JA (1997) Spatial discrimination of salt- and sodium-affected soil surfaces. Intl J Remote Sens 18(12):2571–2586
Moonjun R, Farshad A, Shrestha DP, Vaiphasa C (2010) Artificial neural network and decision tree in predictive soil mapping of Hoi Num Rin sub-watershed, Thailand. In: Boettinger JL, Howell DW, Moore AC, Hartemink AE, Kienast-Brown S (eds) Digital soil mapping: bridging research, environmental application, and operation. Springer, New York, pp 151–163
Pennock DJ, Corre MD (2001) Development and application of landform segmentation procedures. Soil Tillage Res 58:151–162
Phillips JD (2001) Divergent evolution and the spatial structure of soil landscape variability. Catena 43:101–113
Principi P (1953) Geopedologia (Geologia Pedologica). Studio dei terreni naturali ed agrari. Ramo Editoriale degli Agricoltori, Roma
Rossiter DG (2000) Methodology for soil resource inventories. Lecture notes, 2nd revised version. International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences (ITC), Enschede, The Netherlands
Saldaña A, Stein A, Zinck JA (1998) Spatial variability of soil properties at different scales within three terraces of the Henares valley (Spain). Catena 33:139–153
Saldaña A, Ibáñez JJ, Zinck JA (2011) Soilscape analysis at different scales using pattern indices in the Jarama-Henares interfluve and Henares River valley, Central Spain. Geomorphology 135:284–294
Salgado-Labouriau ML (1980) A pollen diagram of the Pleistocene-Holocene boundary of Lake Valencia, Venezuela. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 30:297–312
Schlichting E (1970) Bodensystematik und bodensoziologie. Z Pflanzenernähr Bodenk 127(1):1–9
Soil Survey Staff (1960) Soil classification: a comprehensive system. 7th approximation. US Government Printing Office, Washington
Soil Survey Staff (1967) Supplement to soil classification system (7th approximation). US Soil Conservation Service, Washington
Soil Survey Staff (1993) Soil survey manual. US Department of Agriculture handbook 18. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
Soil Survey Staff (1999) Soil taxonomy. US Department of Agriculture handbook 436. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
Sokal RR, Sneath PHA (1963) Principles of numerical taxonomy. Freeman, San Francisco
Toomanian N (2013) Pedodiversity and landforms. In: Ibáñez JJ, Bockheim J (eds) Pedodiversity. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 133–152
Tricart J (1972) La terre, planète vivante. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris
Wilding LP, Drees LR (1983) Spatial variability and pedology. In: Wilding LP, Smeck NE, Hall GF (eds) Pedogenesis and soil taxonomy. I concepts and interactions. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 83–116
Wilding LP, Lin H (2006) Advancing the frontiers of soil science towards a geoscience. Geoderma 131:257–274
Zinck JA (1970) Aplicación de la geomorfología al levantamiento de suelos en zonas aluviales. Ministerio de Obras Públicas (MOP), Barcelona
Zinck JA (1972) Ensayo de clasificación numérica de algunos suelos del Valle Guarapiche, Estado Monagas, Venezuela. IV Congreso Latinoamericano de la Ciencia del Suelo (resumen). Maracay
Zinck JA (1974) Definición del ambiente geomorfológico con fines de descripción de suelos. Ministerio de Obras Públicas (MOP), Cagua
Zinck JA (1977) Ensayo sistémico de organización del levantamiento de suelos. Ministerio del Ambiente y de los Recursos Naturales Renovables (MARNR), Maracay
Zinck JA (1986) Una toposecuencia de suelos en el área de Rancho Grande. Dinámica actual e implicaciones paleogeográficas. In: Huber O (ed) La selva nublada de Rancho Grande, Parque Nacional “Henri Pittier”. El ambiente físico, ecología vegetal y anatomía vegetal. Fondo Editorial Acta Científica Venezolana y Seguros Anauco CA, Caracas, pp 67–90
Zinck JA (1988) Physiography and soils. Lecture notes. International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences (ITC), Enschede
Zinck JA, Urriola PL (1971) Estudio edafológico Valle Guarapiche, Estado Monagas. Ministerio de Obras Públicas (MOP), Barcelona
Zinck JA, Valenzuela CR (1990) Soil geographic database: structure and application examples. ITC J 1990(3):270–294
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zinck, J.A. (2016). The Geopedologic Approach. In: Zinck, J.A., Metternicht, G., Bocco, G., Del Valle, H.F. (eds) Geopedology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19159-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19159-1_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19158-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19159-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)