Abstract
Much of current predictive digital soil mapping (PDSM) practice relies on terrain, climate, and remote sensing-derived covariates. These are easy to obtain and can serve as proxies to soil forming factors and from these to soil properties. However, mapping of soil bodies, not properties in isolation, is what gives insight into the soil landscape. A naïve attempt at correlating environmental covariates from current terrain, vegetation density, and surrogates for climate will not succeed in the presence of unmapped variations in parent material, soil bodies, and landforms inherited from past environments. Geopedology integrates an understanding of the geomorphic conditions under which soils evolve with field observations. Examples where simplistic DSM would fail but geopedology would succeed in mapping and, even better, explaining the soil distribution are shown: exhumed paleosols, low-relief depositional environments, and recent post-glacial landscapes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arrouays D, Grundy MG, Hartemink AE et al (2014) Global soil map. Adv Agron 125:93–134
Beaudette DE, O’Geen AT (2009) Soil-web: an online soil survey for California, Arizona, and Nevada. Comput Geosci 35:2119–2128. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2008.10.016
Berendsen HJA (2005) Landschappelijk Nederland: de fysisch-geografische regio’s, 3rd edn. Uitgeverij Van Gorcum. Assen, The Netherlands
Bishop MP, James LA, Shroder JF Jr, Walsh SJ (2012) Geospatial technologies and digital geomorphological mapping: concepts, issues and research. Geomorphology 137:5–26. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.06.027
Dragut L, Schauppenlehner T, Muhar A et al (2009) Optimization of scale and parametrization for terrain segmentation: an application to soil-landscape modeling. Comput Geosci 35:1875–1883
Evans IS (2012) Geomorphometry and landform mapping: what is a landform? Geomorphology 137:94–106. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.09.029
Farshad A, Shrestha DP, Moonjun R (2013) Do the emerging methods of digital soil mapping have anything to learn from the geopedologic approach to soil mapping and vice versa? In: Shahid SA, Taha FK, Abdelfattah MA (eds) Developments in soil classification, land use planning and policy implications. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 109–131
Hengl T (2013) WorldGrids. http://worldgrids.org/doku.php. Accessed 28 Nov 2014
Hengl T, Reuter HI (eds) (2008) Geomorphometry: concepts, software, applications, vol 33, Developments in Soil Science. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Huggett R (1998) Soil chronosequences, soil development, and soil evolution: a critical review. Catena 32(3–4):155–172
Kempen B, Brus DJ, Heuvelink GBM, Stoorvogel JJ (2009) Updating the 1:50,000 Dutch soil map using legacy soil data: a multinomial logistic regression approach. Geoderma 151:311–326
Liu F, Zhang GL, Sun YJ et al (2013) Mapping the three-dimensional distribution of soil organic matter across a subtropical hilly landscape. Soil Sci Soc Am J 77:1241–1253. doi:10.2136/sssaj2012.0317
McBratney AB, Mendonça Santos ML, Minasny B (2003) On digital soil mapping. Geoderma 117:3–52
Milne G (1935) Some suggested units of classification and mapping, particularly for east African soils. Soil Res Suppl Proc Int Soc Soil Sci 4:183–198
Phillips JD (2001) Contingency and generalization in pedology, as exemplified by texture-contrast soils. Geoderma 102(3–4):347–370
Ruhe RV, Daniels RB, Cady JG (1967) Landscape evolution and soil formation in southwestern Iowa, Technical bulletin. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
Scull P, Franklin J, Chadwick O, McArthur D (2003) Predictive soil mapping: a review. Prog Phys Geogr 27:171–197
Toomanian N (2013) Fundamental steps for regional and country level soil surveys. In: Shahid SA, Taha FK, Abdelfattah MA (eds) Developments in soil classification, land use planning and policy implications. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 203–227
von Engeln OD (1961) The finger lakes region: its origin and nature. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Yang L, Jiao Y, Fahmy S et al (2011) Updating conventional soil maps through digital soil mapping. Soil Sci Soc Am J 75:1044–1053. doi:10.2136/sssaj2010.0002
Zhu AX, Band LE, Dutton B, Nimlos T (1996) Automated soil inference under fuzzy logic. Ecol Model 90:123–145
Zinck JA (1987) Aplicación de la geomorfología al levantamiento de suelos en zonas aluviales y definición del ambiente geomorfológico con fines de descripción de suelos. Instituto Geográfico “Augustín Codazzi”, Bogotá
Zinck JA (2013) Geopedology. Elements of geomorphology for soil and geohazard studies, ITC special lecture notes series. Faculty of Geo-information Sciences and Earth Observtion, University of Twente, Enschede
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rossiter, D.G. (2016). Knowledge Is Power: Where Geopedologic Insights Are Necessary for Predictive Digital Soil Mapping. In: Zinck, J.A., Metternicht, G., Bocco, G., Del Valle, H.F. (eds) Geopedology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19159-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19159-1_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19158-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19159-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)