Skip to main content

Knowledge Is Power: Where Geopedologic Insights Are Necessary for Predictive Digital Soil Mapping

  • Chapter
Geopedology
  • 1879 Accesses

Abstract

Much of current predictive digital soil mapping (PDSM) practice relies on terrain, climate, and remote sensing-derived covariates. These are easy to obtain and can serve as proxies to soil forming factors and from these to soil properties. However, mapping of soil bodies, not properties in isolation, is what gives insight into the soil landscape. A naïve attempt at correlating environmental covariates from current terrain, vegetation density, and surrogates for climate will not succeed in the presence of unmapped variations in parent material, soil bodies, and landforms inherited from past environments. Geopedology integrates an understanding of the geomorphic conditions under which soils evolve with field observations. Examples where simplistic DSM would fail but geopedology would succeed in mapping and, even better, explaining the soil distribution are shown: exhumed paleosols, low-relief depositional environments, and recent post-glacial landscapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arrouays D, Grundy MG, Hartemink AE et al (2014) Global soil map. Adv Agron 125:93–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaudette DE, O’Geen AT (2009) Soil-web: an online soil survey for California, Arizona, and Nevada. Comput Geosci 35:2119–2128. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2008.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berendsen HJA (2005) Landschappelijk Nederland: de fysisch-geografische regio’s, 3rd edn. Uitgeverij Van Gorcum. Assen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop MP, James LA, Shroder JF Jr, Walsh SJ (2012) Geospatial technologies and digital geomorphological mapping: concepts, issues and research. Geomorphology 137:5–26. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.06.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dragut L, Schauppenlehner T, Muhar A et al (2009) Optimization of scale and parametrization for terrain segmentation: an application to soil-landscape modeling. Comput Geosci 35:1875–1883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans IS (2012) Geomorphometry and landform mapping: what is a landform? Geomorphology 137:94–106. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.09.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farshad A, Shrestha DP, Moonjun R (2013) Do the emerging methods of digital soil mapping have anything to learn from the geopedologic approach to soil mapping and vice versa? In: Shahid SA, Taha FK, Abdelfattah MA (eds) Developments in soil classification, land use planning and policy implications. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 109–131

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hengl T (2013) WorldGrids. http://worldgrids.org/doku.php. Accessed 28 Nov 2014

  • Hengl T, Reuter HI (eds) (2008) Geomorphometry: concepts, software, applications, vol 33, Developments in Soil Science. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggett R (1998) Soil chronosequences, soil development, and soil evolution: a critical review. Catena 32(3–4):155–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempen B, Brus DJ, Heuvelink GBM, Stoorvogel JJ (2009) Updating the 1:50,000 Dutch soil map using legacy soil data: a multinomial logistic regression approach. Geoderma 151:311–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Zhang GL, Sun YJ et al (2013) Mapping the three-dimensional distribution of soil organic matter across a subtropical hilly landscape. Soil Sci Soc Am J 77:1241–1253. doi:10.2136/sssaj2012.0317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBratney AB, Mendonça Santos ML, Minasny B (2003) On digital soil mapping. Geoderma 117:3–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne G (1935) Some suggested units of classification and mapping, particularly for east African soils. Soil Res Suppl Proc Int Soc Soil Sci 4:183–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JD (2001) Contingency and generalization in pedology, as exemplified by texture-contrast soils. Geoderma 102(3–4):347–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruhe RV, Daniels RB, Cady JG (1967) Landscape evolution and soil formation in southwestern Iowa, Technical bulletin. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Scull P, Franklin J, Chadwick O, McArthur D (2003) Predictive soil mapping: a review. Prog Phys Geogr 27:171–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toomanian N (2013) Fundamental steps for regional and country level soil surveys. In: Shahid SA, Taha FK, Abdelfattah MA (eds) Developments in soil classification, land use planning and policy implications. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 203–227

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • von Engeln OD (1961) The finger lakes region: its origin and nature. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Jiao Y, Fahmy S et al (2011) Updating conventional soil maps through digital soil mapping. Soil Sci Soc Am J 75:1044–1053. doi:10.2136/sssaj2010.0002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu AX, Band LE, Dutton B, Nimlos T (1996) Automated soil inference under fuzzy logic. Ecol Model 90:123–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinck JA (1987) Aplicación de la geomorfología al levantamiento de suelos en zonas aluviales y definición del ambiente geomorfológico con fines de descripción de suelos. Instituto Geográfico “Augustín Codazzi”, Bogotá

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinck JA (2013) Geopedology. Elements of geomorphology for soil and geohazard studies, ITC special lecture notes series. Faculty of Geo-information Sciences and Earth Observtion, University of Twente, Enschede

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. G. Rossiter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rossiter, D.G. (2016). Knowledge Is Power: Where Geopedologic Insights Are Necessary for Predictive Digital Soil Mapping. In: Zinck, J.A., Metternicht, G., Bocco, G., Del Valle, H.F. (eds) Geopedology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19159-1_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics