Abstract
Since its beginning in the 1990s, laparoscopic surgical technique has partly or event totally replaced the classical open technique in some branches of surgery. The surgical resection of colorectal cancer, which this paper is engaged in, is no exception. However, besides the well-known benefits of this technique, there are also less known disadvantages, which can significantly influence morbidity. In such a situation we can ask, which technique will guarantee longer survival time to the patient. The medical survival censored data of 866 patients were evaluated by the Cox proportional hazards model in order to answer this question and to find the other parameters, which can influence the survival time of the patient. The surgical techniques were compared separately for patients with surgical resection of colon and for patients with surgical resection of rectum, because these two types of techniques are inherently different. Survival analysis performed by the Cox proportional hazards model led in both cases to the same conclusion, namely that there is no statistically significant difference in survival times between the two groups of patients operated by different surgical techniques.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abraham, N.S., Young, J.M., Solomon, M.J.: Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br. J. Surg. 91, 1111–1114 (2004)
Bonjer, H.J., et al.: Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer. Arch. Surg. 142, 298–303 (2007)
Breslow, N.E.: Covariance analysis of censored survival data. Biometrics 30, 89–100 (1974)
Cox, D.R.: Regression models and life-tables (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 34, 187–220 (1972)
Cox, D.R.: Partial likelihood. Biometrics 62, 269–276 (1975)
Efron, B.: The efficiency of Coxs likelihood function for censored data. JASA 72, 557–565 (1977)
Fleshman, J., et al.: Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferioir to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST study group trial. Ann. Surg. 246, 655–662 (2007)
Hosmer, D.W., Lemeshow, S., May, S.: Applied Survival Analysis. Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data. Wiley, Hoboken (2008)
Jackson, T.D., et al.: Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal cancer: a me-taanalysis of oncologic outcomes. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 204, 439–446 (2007)
Kitano, S., et al.: A multicenter study on laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in Japan. Surg. Endos. 20, 1348–1352 (2006)
Royston, P., Altman, D.G.: Regression using fractional polynomials of continuous covariates: parsimonious parametric modelling (with discussion). Appl. Stat. 43, 429–467 (1994)
Schoenfeld, D.: Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression model. Biometrics 69, 239–241 (1982)
Schwenk, W., et al.: CShort term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev (2) (2005). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003145.pub2
Veldkamp, R., et al.: Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Suregry. Surg. Endosc. 18, 1163–1185 (2004)
Acknowledgments
This Paper has been prepared in the framework of the IT4Innovations Centre of Excellence project, reg. no. CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0070 supported by Operational Programme ‘Research and Development for Innovations’ funded by Structural Funds of the European Union and the Government of Czech Republic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Janurová, K., Martínek, L. (2016). Assessment of Mortality Risk for Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery Using Regression Modeling. In: Bris, R., Majernik, J., Pancerz, K., Zaitseva, E. (eds) Applications of Computational Intelligence in Biomedical Technology. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 606. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19147-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19147-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19146-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19147-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)