Skip to main content

Assessment of Mortality Risk for Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery Using Regression Modeling

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Applications of Computational Intelligence in Biomedical Technology

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 606))

  • 826 Accesses

Abstract

Since its beginning in the 1990s, laparoscopic surgical technique has partly or event totally replaced the classical open technique in some branches of surgery. The surgical resection of colorectal cancer, which this paper is engaged in, is no exception. However, besides the well-known benefits of this technique, there are also less known disadvantages, which can significantly influence morbidity. In such a situation we can ask, which technique will guarantee longer survival time to the patient. The medical survival censored data of 866 patients were evaluated by the Cox proportional hazards model in order to answer this question and to find the other parameters, which can influence the survival time of the patient. The surgical techniques were compared separately for patients with surgical resection of colon and for patients with surgical resection of rectum, because these two types of techniques are inherently different. Survival analysis performed by the Cox proportional hazards model led in both cases to the same conclusion, namely that there is no statistically significant difference in survival times between the two groups of patients operated by different surgical techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abraham, N.S., Young, J.M., Solomon, M.J.: Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br. J. Surg. 91, 1111–1114 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonjer, H.J., et al.: Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer. Arch. Surg. 142, 298–303 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Breslow, N.E.: Covariance analysis of censored survival data. Biometrics 30, 89–100 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cox, D.R.: Regression models and life-tables (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 34, 187–220 (1972)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cox, D.R.: Partial likelihood. Biometrics 62, 269–276 (1975)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Efron, B.: The efficiency of Coxs likelihood function for censored data. JASA 72, 557–565 (1977)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Fleshman, J., et al.: Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferioir to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST study group trial. Ann. Surg. 246, 655–662 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hosmer, D.W., Lemeshow, S., May, S.: Applied Survival Analysis. Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data. Wiley, Hoboken (2008)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Jackson, T.D., et al.: Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal cancer: a me-taanalysis of oncologic outcomes. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 204, 439–446 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kitano, S., et al.: A multicenter study on laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in Japan. Surg. Endos. 20, 1348–1352 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Royston, P., Altman, D.G.: Regression using fractional polynomials of continuous covariates: parsimonious parametric modelling (with discussion). Appl. Stat. 43, 429–467 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schoenfeld, D.: Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression model. Biometrics 69, 239–241 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schwenk, W., et al.: CShort term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev (2) (2005). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003145.pub2

  14. Veldkamp, R., et al.: Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Suregry. Surg. Endosc. 18, 1163–1185 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This Paper has been prepared in the framework of the IT4Innovations Centre of Excellence project, reg. no. CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0070 supported by Operational Programme ‘Research and Development for Innovations’ funded by Structural Funds of the European Union and the Government of Czech Republic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kateřina Janurová .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Janurová, K., Martínek, L. (2016). Assessment of Mortality Risk for Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery Using Regression Modeling. In: Bris, R., Majernik, J., Pancerz, K., Zaitseva, E. (eds) Applications of Computational Intelligence in Biomedical Technology. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 606. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19147-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19147-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19146-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19147-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics