Skip to main content

Achieving the Zero-Liquid-Discharge Target Using the Integrated Membrane System for Seawater Desalination

  • Chapter
Recent Progress in Desalination, Environmental and Marine Outfall Systems

Abstract

Membrane desalination technology has emerged in recent years as the most viable solution to water shortage. However, despite the enormous improvement in membrane desalination technology, some critical developments are still necessary in order to accomplish possible improvements in the process efficiency (to increase recovery), operational stability (to reduce fouling and scaling problems), environmental impact (to reduce brine disposal), water quality (to remove harmful substances) and costs. In particular, cost- effective and environmentally-sensitive concentrate management is today recognized as a significant obstacle to extensive implementation of desalination technologies. As a result of the significant impact of desalination plants on the environment, the requirements for concentrate management are brine disposal minimization and zero liquid discharge (ZLD), both being the demanding targets for several applications. Conventional pressure-driven membranes such as MF, NF and RO were integrated with the innovative units of membrane contactors such as Membrane Distillation/Crystallization (MD/MC). The integration of different membrane units represents an interesting way for achieving the ZLD goal due to the possibility of overcoming the limits of the single units, thus improving the performance of the overall operation.

The present research study focuses on the evaluation of the integrated membrane system which merges membrane contactor technology with conventional pressure-driven membrane operations for seawater desalination. Sensitivity studies were performed for several configurations of the integrated system to obtain the most sensitive parameter in the total water cost and optimal design of the system.

The results revealed that the pressure-driven membrane operations were very sensitive to the feed concentration and the cost of electricity consumption. On the other hand, MD processes were not sensitive to the variation of the feed concentration or the electricity costs. The most sensitive parameter in the total water cost of the MD plant was the cost of steam which contributed to values as high as high as 11.4 % in case of MD without a heat recovery system. The best tolerance to the variation of these parameters was obtained when using the integrated membrane system of pressure-driven membranes and MC processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Al-Hajri KR, Al-Misned LA (1994) Water resources in the GCC countries: a strategic option. Renew Energy 5(1–4):524–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Obaidani S et al (2008) Potential of membrane distillation in seawater desalination: thermal efficiency, sensitivity study and cost estimation. J Membr Sci 323:85–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curcio E, Drioli E (2005) Membrane distillation and related operations – A review. Sep Purif Rev 34:35–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ding Z, Liu L, El-Bourawi MS, Ma R (2005) Analysis of a solar-powered membrane distillation system. Desalination 172:27–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drioli E, Macedonio F (2007) D 1.1.1 Report on raising public participation and awareness. pp 1–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Drioli E et al (2006) Integrating membrane contactors technology and pressure-driven membrane operations for seawater desalination energy, exergy and costs analysis. Chem Eng Res Des 84:209–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ettouney HM, El-Dessouky HT, Gowing PJ (2002) Evaluating the economics of desalination. CEP Magazine, pp 32–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzmann C, Lowenberg J, Wintgens T, Melin T (2007) State-of-the-art of reverse osmosis desalination. Desalination 216:1–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helal AM, El-Nashar AM, Al-Katheeri E, Al-Maler S (2004) Optimal design of hybrid RO/MSF desalination plants. Part III. Sensitivity analysis. Desalination 169:43–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macedonio F, Curcio E, Drioli E (2007) Integrated membrane systems for seawater desalination: energetic and exergetic analysis, economic evaluation, experimental study. Desalination 203:260–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malek A, Hawlader MNA, Ho JC (1996) Design and economics of RO desalination. Desalination 105:245–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mehdizadeh H (2006) Membrane desalination plants from an energy-exergy point of view. Desalination 191:200–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Bruggen B (2003) Desalination by distillation and by reverse osmosis – trends towards the future. Membr Technol 2:6–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wangnick K (2000) IDA Worldwide desalting plants inventory 16, 2000

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sulaiman Al Obaidani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

List of Figures

Fig. 5.1 Pressure-driven membrane operations (MF-RO)

Fig. 5.2 Pressure-driven membrane operations (MF-RO)

Fig. 5.3 Schematic diagram of the MD plant

Fig. 5.4 Schematic representation of the integrated membrane system

Fig. 5.5 Effects of the RO water recovery on the total water cost of MF-RO plants

Fig. 5.6 Effects of the RO water recovery on the total water cost of MF-NF-RO plants

Fig. 5.7 Effects of the NF water recovery on the total water cost of MF-NF-RO plants

Fig. 5.8 Effects of the MD water recovery on the total water cost of MD plants

Fig. 5.9 Effects of the feed concentration on the total water cost of MF-RO plants

Fig. 5.10 Effects of the feed concentration on the total water cost of MF-NF-RO plants

Fig. 5.11 Effects of the feed concentration on the total water cost of MD plants

Fig. 5.12 Effects of the feed concentration on the total water cost of MF-NF-RO-MC_NF-MD_RO plants

Fig. 5.13 Effects of the membrane cost on the total water cost of MF-RO plants

Fig. 5.14 Effects of the membrane cost on the total water cost of MF-NF-RO plants

Fig. 5.15 Effects of the membrane cost on the total water cost of MD plants

Fig. 5.16 Effects of the membrane cost on the total water cost of MF-NF-RO-MC_NF-MD_RO plants

Fig. 5.17 Effects of the electricity cost on the total water cost of MF-RO plants

Fig. 5.18 Effects of the electricity cost on the total water cost of MF-NF-RO plants

Fig. 5.19 Effects of the electricity cost on the total water cost of MF-NF-RO-MC_NF-MD_RO plants

Fig. 5.20 Effects of the steam cost on the total water cost of MD plants

Fig. 5.21 Effects of the steam cost on the total water cost of MF-NF-RO-MC_NF-MD_RO plants

Fig. 5.22 Effects of membrane lifetime on the total water cost of desalination plants

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Al Obaidani, S., Al-Abri, M., Al-Rawahi, N. (2015). Achieving the Zero-Liquid-Discharge Target Using the Integrated Membrane System for Seawater Desalination. In: Baawain, M., Choudri, B., Ahmed, M., Purnama, A. (eds) Recent Progress in Desalination, Environmental and Marine Outfall Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19123-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics