Abstract
At the dawn of the twenty-first century, both state and non-state actors of International Relations are facing the need to find their place in reality, which appears to be increasingly unclear. The ongoing process of ‘re-configuration of the anarchic character of international environment’ has begun to unfold. This process is articulated by unprecedented heterogeneity of entities operating ‘across’ state borders, and not ‘within their limits’. It has been accompanied the emergence of many equivalent decision-making centres which base their actions on pluralism, co-operation and departure from hierarchical relations between territorial and non-territorial actors. ‘Re-configuration’ is accompanied by the idea of governance. It is linked more with controlling than governing, and so with a wide range of processes is used to co-ordinate decision-making and implement certain policies. It is worth noting that governance consists in the adaptation of individual and collective methods of solving common issues, so as to find solutions to continually emerging conflicts, mitigate differences in interests and, as a consequence, to broaden the field of possible co-operation between heterogeneous entities. Various formal and informal institutions play a key role here. Their intentions may become a catalyst of group activity (Commission, 1995: 2).
Keywords
- European Union
- International System
- Global Governance
- Informal Institution
- Southern African Development Community
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
As indicated in political science literature, globalisation entails changes which result, for example, in an increased number of rapidly spreading non-government organisations constituting the basis for global civil society. The latter involves “entities, ventures, enterprises, non-profit organisations, social movements, various communities, celebrities, intellectuals, think-tanks, charity organisations, pressure groups, protest movements, media, Internet groups and sites, trade unions, employers’ federations, international commissions, sporting organisations, all forming multi-level, tightly connected space”. Cf. E. Pietrzak (2013: 85).
- 2.
The above views are not new. They stem from the tradition of political concepts of the West, highlighting the importance of the mechanisms of free market, reciprocity, trust and solidarity. They provide contrast with control and subordination, as concepts thoroughly anti-liberal. Cf. Streeck and Schmitter (1985): 119–138.
References
Caporaso, J. A., & Madeira, M. A. (2012). Globalization, institutions, and governance. London: Sage.
Commission on Global Governance, (1995). Our global neighbourhood. New York: Oxford University Press.
Łoś-Nowak, T. (2011). Polityka zagraniczna w przestrzeni teoretycznej. In T. Łoś-Nowak (Ed.), Polityka zagraniczna. Aktorzy-potencjały-strategie. Warszawa: Poltext.
O’Neill, J. (2001). Building better global economic BRICs. Global economics paper 66, November 30, http://www.goldmansachs.com/our-thinking/archive/archive-pdfs/build-better-brics.pdf. Accessed on February 10, 2015.
Pieterse, J. N. (2011). Global rebalancing: Crisis and the east–south turn. Development and Change, 42(1), 22–48.
Pietrzak, E. (2013). Nieposłuszeństwo i profanacje - globalne społeczeństwo obywatelskie’. Przegląd Politologiczny, 1, 83–91.
Rodrik, D. (2011). The globalization paradox. Democracy and the future of the world economy. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Slaughter, A. M. (2004). A new world order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Streeck, W., & Schmitter, P. C. (1985). Community, market, state—and associations? European Sociological Review, 1(2), 119–138.
Whitney, C. R. (1991). War in the Gulf: Europe; Gulf fighting Shatters Europeans’ fragile unity. The New York Times, January 25, http://www.nytimes.com/1991/01/25/world/war-in-the-gulf-europe-gulf-fighting-shatters-europeans-fragile-unity.html?pagewanted=1. Accessed on February 18, 2015.
Wilson, D., & Purushothaman, R. (2003). Dreaming with BRICs: The path to 2050. Global economics paper 99, October 1, http://www.goldmansachs.com/our-thinking/archive/archive-pdfs/brics-dream.pdf. Accessed on February 10, 2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rewizorski, M. (2015). Introduction. In: Rewizorski, M. (eds) The European Union and the BRICS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19099-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19099-0_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19098-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19099-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)