Abstract
When discussing the morality of immortality the basic requirement is that there is a choice. Theoretically this is true both at the level of the individual and society. However, society has tended just to assume that all ‘progress’ is true progress and therefore not to be tampered with. If earthly immortality would be within reach, how could we possibly not grab it? Ultra-liberalism might suggest that it is immoral even to discuss the morality of immortality. Everybody should make his or her own choice. However, this is wrong. All exercise of freedom influences the freedom of others. Balancing is required. A society of immortals would not only mean that there would be no future generations, but would also mean that those who like to live in our current society, with a value system informed also by death, would be deprived of that possibility. So choices will be required by society first, and then, if society chooses the immortality route, the individual must choose whether to avail her- or himself of the possibility.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hulsroj, P. (2015). Choices, Choices. In: What If We Don't Die?. Springer Praxis Books(). Copernicus, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19093-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19093-8_3
Publisher Name: Copernicus, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19092-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19093-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)