Skip to main content

A Comparative Study on Single and Dual Space Reduction in Multi-label Classification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems: Recent Trends, Advances and Solutions

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 364))

Abstract

Multi-label classification has been applied to several applications since it can assign multiple class labels to an object. However, its effectiveness might be sacrificed due to high-dimensionality problem in both feature space and label space. To address these issues, several dimensionality reduction methods have been proposed to transform the high-dimensional spaces to low-dimensional spaces. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review on ten-dimensionality reduction methods that applied to multi-label classification. These methods can be categorized into two main approaches: single space reduction and dual space reduction. While the former approach aims to reduce the complexity in either feature space or label space, the latter approach transforms both feature and label spaces into two subspaces. Moreover, a comparative study on single space reduction and dual space reduction approaches with five real-world datasets are also reported. The experimental results indicated that dual space reduction approach tends to give better performance comparing to the single reduction approach. Furthermore, experiments have been conducted to investigate the effect of dataset characteristics on classification performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://mulan.sourceforge.net/datasets.html.

  2. 2.

    http://www.R-project.org/.

  3. 3.

    http://dataminingtrend.com/kicss2013/supplementary.pdf.

  4. 4.

    http://rapidminer.com.

References

  1. An, A., Cercone, N.: Rule quality measures for rule induction systems: description and evaluation. Comput. Intell. 17(3), 409–424 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chekina, L., Rokach, L., Shapira, B.: Meta-learning for selecting a multi-label classification algorithm. In: IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), pp. 220–227, Dec 2011

    Google Scholar 

  3. Golub, G., Reinsch, C.: Singular value decomposition and least squares solutions. Numerische Mathematik 14, 403–420 (1970)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Hsu, D., Kakade, S., Langford, J., Zhang, T.: Multi-label prediction via compressed sensing. In: Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 22, pp. 772–780 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Madjarov, G., Kocev, D., Gjorgjevikj, D., Deroski, S.: An extensive experimental comparison of methods for multi-label learning. Pattern Recogn. 45(9), 3084–3104 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Miettinen, P.: The boolean column and column-row matrix decompositions. Data Min. Knowl. Disc. 17(1), 39–56 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Pacharawongsakda, E., Theeramunkong, T.: Towards more efficient multi-label classification using dependent and independent dual space reduction. In: Proceedings of the 16th Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining(PAKDD), PAKDD’12, pp. 383–394 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pacharawongsakda, E., Theeramunkong, T.: A two-stage dimensionality reduction framework for multi-label classification. In: Proceedings of the PAKDD Workshop on quality issues, measures of interestingness and evaluation of data mining models (QIMIE), QIMIE 2013, pp. 330–341 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Read, J., Pfahringer, B., Holmes, G., Frank, E.: Classifier chains for multi-label classification. Mach. Learn. 1–27 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schapire, R., Singer, Y.: Boostexter: a boosting-based system for text categorization. Machine Learn. 39(2/3), 135–168 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Tai, F., Lin, H.T.: Multi-label classification with principle label space transformation. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Learning from Multi-Label Data (MLD’10), pp. 45–52 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tsoumakas, G., Katakis, I., Vlahavas, I.: Mining Multi-label Data. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, H., Ding, C., Huang, H.: Multi-label linear discriminant analysis. In: Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Computer Vision: Part VI, pp. 126–139. Springer, Berlin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wicker, J., Pfahringer, B., Kramer, S.: Multi-label classification using boolean matrix decomposition. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 179–186. Springer, Berlin (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yu, K., Yu, S., Tresp, V.: Multi-label informed latent semantic indexing. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 258–265 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, M.L., Zhou, Z.H.: A review on multi-label learning algorithms. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 99(PrePrints), 1 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, Y., Zhou, Z.H.: Multilabel dimensionality reduction via dependence maximization. ACM Trans. Knowl. Disc. Data (TKDD) 4(3), 1–21 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the TRF Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program [PHD/0304/2551]; and the Government Research Fund via Thammasat University, Thailand, and the National Research University Project of Thailand Office of Higher Education Commission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eakasit Pacharawongsakda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pacharawongsakda, E., Theeramunkong, T. (2016). A Comparative Study on Single and Dual Space Reduction in Multi-label Classification. In: Skulimowski, A., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems: Recent Trends, Advances and Solutions. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 364. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19090-7_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19090-7_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19089-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19090-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics