Hydration and Nanoconfined Water: Insights from Computer Simulations

  • Laureano M. Alarcón
  • J. A. Rodríguez Fris
  • Marcela A. Morini
  • M. Belén Sierra
  • S. A. Accordino
  • J. M. Montes de Oca
  • Viviana I. Pedroni
  • Gustavo A. AppignanesiEmail author
Part of the Subcellular Biochemistry book series (SCBI, volume 71)


The comprehension of the structure and behavior of water at interfaces and under nanoconfinement represents an issue of major concern in several central research areas like hydration, reaction dynamics and biology. From one side, water is known to play a dominant role in the structuring, the dynamics and the functionality of biological molecules, governing main processes like protein folding, protein binding and biological function. In turn, the same principles that rule biological organization at the molecular level are also operative for materials science processes that take place within a water environment, being responsible for the self-assembly of molecular structures to create synthetic supramolecular nanometrically-sized materials. Thus, the understanding of the principles of water hydration, including the development of a theory of hydrophobicity at the nanoscale, is imperative both from a fundamental and an applied standpoint. In this work we present some molecular dynamics studies of the structure and dynamics of water at different interfaces or confinement conditions, ranging from simple model hydrophobic interfaces with different geometrical constraints (in order to single out curvature effects), to self-assembled monolayers, proteins and phospholipid membranes. The tendency of the water molecules to sacrifice the lowest hydrogen bond (HB) coordination as possible at extended interfaces is revealed. This fact makes the first hydration layers to be highly oriented, in some situations even resembling the structure of hexagonal ice. A similar trend to maximize the number of HBs is shown to hold in cavity filling, with small subnanometric hydrophobic cavities remaining empty while larger cavities display an alternation of filled and dry states with a significant inner HB network. We also study interfaces with complex chemical and geometrical nature in order to determine how different conditions affect the local hydration properties. Thus, we show some results for protein hydration and, particularly, some preliminary studies on membrane hydration. Finally, calculations of a local hydrophobicity measure of relevance for binding and self-assembly are also presented. We then conclude with a few words of further emphasis on the relevance of this kind of knowledge to biology and to the design of new materials by highlighting the context-dependent and non-additive nature of different non-covalent interactions in an aqueous nanoenvironment, an issue that is usually greatly overlooked.


Hydration water Confined water Geometry Computer simulation H-bonds Self assembled monolayers Hydrophobicity Density fluctuations 



LMA, JAR-F, MBS, MAM and GAA are research fellows of CONICET. SRA and JMM-O thank CONICET for a fellowship. The authors gratefully thank CONICET and MinCyT for financial support.


  1. Accordino SR, Malaspina DC, Rodríguez Fris JA, Appignanesi GA (2011a) Comment on “Glass transition in biomolecules and the liquid-liquid critical point of water”. Phys Rev Lett 106:029801CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Accordino SR, Rodriguez Fris JA, Sciortino F, Appignanesi GA (2011b) Quantitative investigation of the two-state picture for water in the normal liquid and the supercooled regime. Eur Phys J E 34:48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Accordino SR, Malaspina DC, Rodriguez Fris JA, Alarcón LM, Appignanesi GA (2012a) Temperature dependence of the structure of protein hydration water and the liquid-liquid transition. Phys Rev E 85:031503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Accordino SR, Morini MA, Sierra MB, Rodríguez Fris JA, Appignanesi GA, Fernández A (2012b) Protein packing defects “heat up” interfacial water. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf 80:1755Google Scholar
  5. Accordino SR, Rodriguez Fris JA, Appignanesi GA, Fernández A (2012c) A unifying motif of intermolecular cooperativity in protein associations. Eur Phys J E 35:59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Accordino SR, Rodriguez Fris JA, Appignanesi GA (2013) Wrapping effects within a proposed function-rescue strategy for the Y220C oncogenic mutation of protein p53. PLoS One 8, e55123PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Alarcón LM, Malaspina DC, Schulz EP, Frechero MA, Appignanesi GA (2011) Structure and orientation of water molecules at model hydrophobic surfaces with curvature: from graphene sheets to carbon nanotubes and fullerenes. Chem Phys 388:47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Alarcón LM, Montes de Oca JM, Accordino SR, Rodriguez Fris JA, Appignanesi GA (2014) Hydrophobicity and geometry: water at curved graphitic-like surfaces and within model pores in self-assembled monolayers. Fluid Phase Equilib 362:81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Appignanesi GA, Rodríguez Firs JA, Sciortino F (2009) Evidence of a two-state picture for supercooled water and its connections with glassy dynamics. Eur Phys J E 29:305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Arsov Z (2015) Chapter 6: Long-range lipid-water interaction as observed by ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. In Disalvo EA (ed) Membrane hydration: the role of water in the structure and function of biological membranes. Springer, Cham, pp 127–159Google Scholar
  11. Berne BJ, Weeks JD, Zhou R (2009) Dewetting and hydrophobic interaction in physical and biological systems. Annu Rev Phys Chem 60:85PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bizzarri A, Cannistraro SJ (2002) Molecular dynamics of water at the protein-solvent interface. Phys Chem B 106:6617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bogan AA, Thorn KS (1998) Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. J Mol Biol 208:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cevc G (1987) How membrane chain melting properties are controlled by the polar surface of the lipid bilayers. Biochemistry 26:6305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Choudhury N, Montgomery PB (2005) Dynamics of water trapped between hydrophobic solutes. J Phys Chem B 109:6422CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Disalvo A, Lairion F, Martini F, Tymczyszyn E, Frias M (2008) Structural and functional properties of hydration and confined water in membrane interfaces. Biochim et Biophys Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes 1778:2655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fan Y, Chen X, Yang L, Cremer PS, Gao YQ (2009) On the structure of water at the aqueous/air interface. J Phys Chem B 113:11672CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Faul CFJ, Antonietti M (2003) Ionic self-assembly: facile synthesis of supramolecular materials. Adv Mater 15:673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fernández A (2010) Transformative concepts for drug design: target wrapping. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fernández A, Scheraga HA (2003) Insufficiently dehydrated hydrogen bonds as determinants of protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:113PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fernández A, Scott R (2003) Adherence of packing defects in soluble proteins. Phys Rev Lett 91:018102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gelman Constantin J, Rodriguez Fris JA, Appignanesi GA, Carignano MA, Szleifer I, Corti HR (2011) Structure of supercooled water in clusters and bulk and its relation to the two-state picture of water: results from the TIP4P-ice model. Eur Phys J E 34:126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Giovambattista N, Debenedetti PG, Lopez CF, Rossky PJ (2008) Hydrophobicity of protein surfaces: separating geometry from chemistry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:2274PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Giovambattista N, Rossky PJ, Debenedetti PG (2012) Computational studies of pressure, temperature and surface effects on the structure and thermodynamics of confined water. Annu Rev Phys Chem 63:179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Huang DM, Chandler D (2000) Temperature and length scale dependence of hydrophobic effects and their possible implications for protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:8324PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Huang X, Margulis CJ, Berne BJ (2003) Dewetting-induced collapse of hydrophobic particles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:11953PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kulp JL III, Kulp JL Jr, Pompliano DL, Guarnieri F (2011) Diverse fragment clustering and water exclusion identify protein hot spots. J Am Chem Soc 133:10740CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Li J, Liu Q (2009) ‘Double water exclusion’: a hypothesis refining the O-ring theory for the hot spots at protein interfaces. Bioinformatics 25:743PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Malaspina DC, Rodriguez Fris JA, Appignanesi GA, Sciortino F (2009) Identifying a causal link between structure and dynamics in supercooled water. Europhys Lett 88:16003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Malaspina D, Schulz EP, Alarcón LM, Frechero MA, Appignanesi GA (2010) Structural and dynamical aspects of water in contact with a hydrophobic surface. Eur Phys J E 32:35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Nagle JF, Tristram-Nagle S (2000) Structure of lipid bilayers. Biochim Biophys Acta 1469:159PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Nickels JD, Katsaras J (2015) Chapter 3: Water and lipid bilayers. In: Disalvo EA (ed) Membrane hydration: the role of water in the structure and function of biological membranes. Springer, Cham, pp 45–67Google Scholar
  33. Pfeiffer H (2015) Chapter 4: Hydration forces between lipid bilayers: a theoretical overview and a look on methods exploring dehydration. In: Disalvo EA (ed) Membrane hydration: the role of water in the structure and function of biological membranes. Springer, Cham, pp 69–104Google Scholar
  34. Qvist J, Davidovic M, Hamelberg D, Halle B (2008) A dry ligand-binding cavity in a solvated protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:6296PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rasaiah JC, Garde S, Hummer G (2008) Water in nonpolar confinement: from nanotubes to proteins and beyond. Annu Rev Phys Chem 59:713CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rehm TH, Schmuck C (2010) Ionpair induced self-assembly in aqueous solvents. Chem Soc Rev 39:3597CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Schulz EP, Alarcón LM, Appignanesi GA (2011) Behavior of water in contact with model hydrophobic cavities and tunnels and carbon nanotubes. Eur Phys J E 34:114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Shen YR, Ostroverkhov V (2006) Sum-frequency vibrational spectroscopy on water interfaces: polar orientation of water molecules at interfaces. Chem Rev 106:1140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Shiratani E, Sasai M (1996) Growth and collapse of structural patterns in the hydrogen bond network in liquid water. J Chem Phys 104:7671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shiratani E, Sasai M (1998) Molecular scale precursor of the liquid–liquid phase transition of water. J Chem Phys 108:3264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sierra MB, Accordino SR, Rodriguez Fris JA, Morini MA, Appignanesi GA, Fernández SA (2013) Protein packing defects “heat up” interfacial wáter. Eur Phys J E 36:62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Stanley HE, Kumar P, Xu L, Yan Z, Mazza MG, Buldyrev SV, Chen S-H, Mallamace F (2007) The puzzling unsolved mysteries of liquid water: some recent progress. Phys A 386:729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vitkup D, Ringe D, Petsko GA, Karplus M (2000) Solvent mobility and the protein glass transition. Nat Struct Biol 7:34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang L, Berne BJ, Friesner RA (2011) Ligand binding to protein-binding pockets with wet and dry regions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:1326PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Young T, Abel R, Kim B, Berne BJ, Friesner RA (2007) Motifs for molecular recognition exploiting hydrophobic enclosure in protein–ligand binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:808PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laureano M. Alarcón
    • 1
  • J. A. Rodríguez Fris
    • 1
  • Marcela A. Morini
    • 1
  • M. Belén Sierra
    • 1
  • S. A. Accordino
    • 1
  • J. M. Montes de Oca
    • 1
  • Viviana I. Pedroni
    • 1
  • Gustavo A. Appignanesi
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Departamento de Química and INQUISUR-UNS-CONICETUniversidad Nacional del SurBahía BlancaArgentina

Personalised recommendations