Abstract
Most prosthetic eyes are cosmetically satisfactory and cause little trouble in use. Sometimes, however, the socket and eyelids are distorted due to scarring, tissue loss or through recession over time. These complicated sockets present a challenge to the ocular prosthetist and the oculo-plastic surgeon. Modifications to the prosthesis may go a long way towards improving cosmetic outcomes and, in many cases, offer a satisfactory alternative to oculo-plastic surgery. However, surgical procedures provide more scope for improvement than modifying the prosthesis alone, and it is important that patients are fully informed and made aware of the range of solutions offered by both prosthetist and surgeon. One well-informed patient may happily accept a partial solution to their problem to avoid the inconvenience of surgery, while another might want everything done that can be addressed safely and effectively. Surgical interventions used to address specific issues need be considered within the context of the entire face as each change has implications for other facial features. Often, the best results will be achieved through a combination of both socket surgery and prosthesis modification.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Nguyen J, Ivan D, Esmaeli B. Conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma in the anophthalmic socket. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;24(2):98–101.
Shibata M, Usui Y, Ueda S, Matsumura H, Nagao T, Goto H. A case of orbital sebaceous gland carcinoma developing in an anophthalmic socket 65 years after enucleation. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:1825–7.
Kelly K. A discussion of custom pressure conformers. J Am Soc Ocularists. 1991;1:19–24.
Dudash R. Prosthesis fabrication over extruding implants. J Am Soc Ocularists. 1990;1:9–14.
Worrell E. Hollow prosthetic eyes. J Maxillofac Prosthet Technol. 2014;13(1):8–12.
De Voe AG. Experiences with the surgery of the anophthalmic orbit. Am J Ophthalmol. 1945;28:1346–51.
Sugar HS, Forrester HJ. Methacrylate resin implants for sunken upper eyelid following enucleation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1946;29:993–1000.
Smith B, Obear M, Leone CR. The correction of enophthalmos by glass bead implantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1967;64:1088–93.
Zbylski JK. Correction of lower eyelid ptosis in the anophthalmic socket with an autogenous ear cartilage graft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;61:220–3.
Dresner SC, Codère F, Corriveau C. Orbital volume augmentation with adjustable prefabricated methylmethacrylate subperiosteal implants. Ophthalmic Surg. 1991;22(1):53–6.
Nasr AM, Jabak MH, Batainah Y. Orbital volume augmentation with subperiosteal room-temperature-vulcanized silicone implants: a clinical and histopathologic study. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;10(1):11–21.
Shah S, Rhatigan M, Sampath R, Yeoman C, Sunderland S, Brammer R, et al. Use of Proplast 2 as a subperiosteal implant for the correction of anophthalmic enophthalmos. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79(9):830–3.
Chen W. Oculoplastic surgery the essentials. New York: Thieme; 2001.
Guthoff R, Katowitz J, editors. Oculoplastics and orbit. Heidelberg: Springer - Berlin; 2010.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pine, K.R., Sloan, B.H., Jacobs, R.J. (2015). Socket Complications. In: Clinical Ocular Prosthetics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19057-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19057-0_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19056-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19057-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)