Skip to main content

Socket Complications

  • Chapter
Clinical Ocular Prosthetics

Abstract

Most prosthetic eyes are cosmetically satisfactory and cause little trouble in use. Sometimes, however, the socket and eyelids are distorted due to scarring, tissue loss or through recession over time. These complicated sockets present a challenge to the ocular prosthetist and the oculo-plastic surgeon. Modifications to the prosthesis may go a long way towards improving cosmetic outcomes and, in many cases, offer a satisfactory alternative to oculo-plastic surgery. However, surgical procedures provide more scope for improvement than modifying the prosthesis alone, and it is important that patients are fully informed and made aware of the range of solutions offered by both prosthetist and surgeon. One well-informed patient may happily accept a partial solution to their problem to avoid the inconvenience of surgery, while another might want everything done that can be addressed safely and effectively. Surgical interventions used to address specific issues need be considered within the context of the entire face as each change has implications for other facial features. Often, the best results will be achieved through a combination of both socket surgery and prosthesis modification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nguyen J, Ivan D, Esmaeli B. Conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma in the anophthalmic socket. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;24(2):98–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shibata M, Usui Y, Ueda S, Matsumura H, Nagao T, Goto H. A case of orbital sebaceous gland carcinoma developing in an anophthalmic socket 65 years after enucleation. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:1825–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kelly K. A discussion of custom pressure conformers. J Am Soc Ocularists. 1991;1:19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dudash R. Prosthesis fabrication over extruding implants. J Am Soc Ocularists. 1990;1:9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Worrell E. Hollow prosthetic eyes. J Maxillofac Prosthet Technol. 2014;13(1):8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Voe AG. Experiences with the surgery of the anophthalmic orbit. Am J Ophthalmol. 1945;28:1346–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sugar HS, Forrester HJ. Methacrylate resin implants for sunken upper eyelid following enucleation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1946;29:993–1000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith B, Obear M, Leone CR. The correction of enophthalmos by glass bead implantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1967;64:1088–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zbylski JK. Correction of lower eyelid ptosis in the anophthalmic socket with an autogenous ear cartilage graft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;61:220–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dresner SC, Codère F, Corriveau C. Orbital volume augmentation with adjustable prefabricated methylmethacrylate subperiosteal implants. Ophthalmic Surg. 1991;22(1):53–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nasr AM, Jabak MH, Batainah Y. Orbital volume augmentation with subperiosteal room-temperature-vulcanized silicone implants: a clinical and histopathologic study. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;10(1):11–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shah S, Rhatigan M, Sampath R, Yeoman C, Sunderland S, Brammer R, et al. Use of Proplast 2 as a subperiosteal implant for the correction of anophthalmic enophthalmos. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79(9):830–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen W. Oculoplastic surgery the essentials. New York: Thieme; 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Guthoff R, Katowitz J, editors. Oculoplastics and orbit. Heidelberg: Springer - Berlin; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pine, K.R., Sloan, B.H., Jacobs, R.J. (2015). Socket Complications. In: Clinical Ocular Prosthetics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19057-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19057-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19056-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19057-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics