Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 125))

  • 781 Accesses

Abstract

The requirement of fair equality of opportunity has become an indispensable element ingrained in contemporary liberal social democratic theories. It stands as a dominant ideology upheld by a great number of politicians and scholars to regulate the basic structure of society and to direct public policy formulation. In academic circles, it is fashionable to defend this principle in one way or another, but it is quite unpopular to argue against it. Unfortunately, the popularity and dominance of the principle do not lead to its tenability. In fact, the principle is entangled with a series of severe theoretical and practical problems. In his recent work, H. T. Engelhardt, Jr. has uniquely and sharply discerned those problems, which deserves our serious attention. In this chapter, I attempt, based on Engelhardt’s insights and arguments, to provide a critical review of the principle. My focus will be on its disastrous implications for health care allocation as well as its baneful contribution to the erosion of the family.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Becker, G.S. 1993. A treatise on the family, enlarged ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boorse, C. 1975. On the distinction between disease and illness. Philosophy and Public Affairs 5: 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boorse, C. 1977. Health as a theoretical concept. Philosophy of Science 44: 542–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N. 1985. Just health care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N. 2008. Just health: Meeting health needs fairly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N., and J. Sabin. 2002. Setting limits fairly: Can we learn to share medical resources? New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Engehardt Jr., H.T. 1974. Disease of masturbation: Values and the concept of disease. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 48(2): 234–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt Jr., H.T. 1996. The foundations of bioethics, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt Jr., H.T. 2007. Long-term care: The family, post-modernity, and conflicting moral life-worlds. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32: 519–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt Jr., H.T. 2012. Fair equality of opportunity critically reexamined: The family and the sustainability of health care systems. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37: 583–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt Jr., H.T. 2013. The family: Crucial to and divisive in bioethics. International Journal of Chinese and Comparative Philosophy of Medicine 11: 113–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. 2006. America at the crossroads: Democracy, power, and the neoconservative legacy. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girgis, S., R.P. George, and R.T. Anderson. 2011. What is marriage? Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 34: 245–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, A., and D. Thompson. 1996. Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C. 2012. Coming apart: The state of white America 1960–2010. New York: Crown Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.B. 2012. Why liberal neutrality prohibits same-sex marriage: Rawls, political liberalism and the family. British Journal of American Legal Studies 1: 411–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1997. The idea of public reason revisited. The University of Chicago Law Review 64: 765–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rector, R. 2010. Marriage: America’s greatest weapon against child poverty. Backgrounder 2465: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, L. 1983. Opportunity and health care: Criticism and suggestions. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8: 339–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velleman, J.D. 2005. Family history. Philosophical Papers 34: 357–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Y.C.R. 2013a. Economics of the family and same-sex marriages. [Online] Available: http://www.wangyujian.com/?p=1997&lang=en. Accessed on 16 Mar 2013.

  • Wong, Y.C.R. 2013b. Housing, retirement and the economy – Why family savings and investing in children matters? [Online] Available: http://www.wangyujian.com/?p=2004&lang=en. Accessed on 16 Mar 2013.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruiping Fan Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fan, R. (2015). Equality Is Problematic: Engelhardt on Fair Equality of Opportunity, Health Care, and the Family. In: Rasmussen, L., Iltis, A., Cherry, M. (eds) At the Foundations of Bioethics and Biopolitics: Critical Essays on the Thought of H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr.. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 125. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18965-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics