Abstract
This chapter provides a critical appraisal of Engelhardt’s conception of “the Enlightenment project” as a quest for certainty in bioethics. The chapter begins with an elaboration of the elements of this conception and its purported sole alternative in morality, nihilism. The critical appraisal begins with an account of a competitor Enlightenment project. There was no single Enlightenment, as Engelhardt apparently assumes, but multiple national Enlightenments. This is both historically and philosophically important; the Scottish and English Enlightenments, it turns out, provide an alternative Enlightenment project, in which reason does not play the dominant role. The result is, not a quest for certainty in morality, but a quest for reliability. There is, historically and philosophically, a third alternative to the quest for certainty in bioethics; namely, the quest for reliability in bioethics. The chapter then shows how, in a very important sense, Engelhardt’s bioethics can be read as itself very much an Enlightenment project. The Foundations, it turns out, are deeply in philosophical debt, methodologically, to the German Enlightenment and its conception of Reason. The chapter closes with an account of the attraction of a bioethics of reliability for the ethics of the health care professions and for health policy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In this author’s view, this is one of the most beautiful ideas in all of the history of Western philosophy, thus making its claim to be true very attractive.
References
Beauchamp, T.L. 2010. Standing on principles: Collected essays. New York: Oxford University Press.
Berlin, I. 1958. Two concepts of liberty: An inaugural lecture delivered before the University of Oxford 31 October 1958. Oxford: Clarendon.
Degrazia, D., and T.L. Beauchamp. 2010. Philosophy: Ethical principles of common morality. In Methods in medical ethics, 2nd ed, ed. J. Sugarman and D.P. Sulmasy, 37–53. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Engelhardt Jr., H.T. 1986. The foundations of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Engelhardt Jr., H.T. 1996. The foundations of bioethics, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gracia, D. 2010. Philosophy: Ancient and contemporary approaches. In Methods in medical ethics, 2nd ed, ed. J. Sugarman and D.P. Sulmasy, 55–71. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Hume, D. 2000 [1739–1740]. A treatise of human nature, ed. D.F. Norton and M.J. Norton. New York: Oxford University Press.
McCullough, L.B. 1998. John Gregory and the invention of professional medical ethics and the profession of medicine. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
McCullough, L.B. 2006. The ethical concept of medicine as a profession: Its origins in modern medical ethics and implications for physicians. In Lost virtue: Professional character development in medical education, ed. N. Kenny and W. Shelton, 17–27. New York: Elsevier.
Porter, R., and M. Teich (eds.). 1981. The enlightenment in national context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Price, R. 1974 [1769]. A review of the principal questions in morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Strawson, P.F. 1963. Individuals: An essay in descriptive metaphysics. Garden City: Anchor Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McCullough, L.B. (2015). A Critical Appraisal of Engelhardt on the “Enlightenment Project”. In: Rasmussen, L., Iltis, A., Cherry, M. (eds) At the Foundations of Bioethics and Biopolitics: Critical Essays on the Thought of H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr.. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 125. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18965-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18965-9_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18964-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18965-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)