Skip to main content

Quantum Corrections: Natural Versus Non-natural

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Theoretical and Observational Consistency of Massive Gravity

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 480 Accesses

Abstract

Similar puzzles are also encountered within the Standard Model of particle physics, for example the Higgs Hierarchy problem of why the Higgs mass is so small relative to the Planck scale. These hierarchies are puzzling as they do not seem to be protected without the help of new physics, such as supersymmetry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Without loss of generality we assume for now that \(\mathrm {h}\) and \({\uppi }\) are diagonalized.

  2. 2.

    We are omitting here the part containing the helicity-1 interactions, which can uniquely be restored due to diff invariance of the helicity-2+helicity-1 system, and the \(\mathrm {U}(1)\) invariance of the helicity-1+helicity-0 system.

  3. 3.

    In this analysis, the graviton mass \(\mathrm{m}\) is completely absorbed into \(\Lambda _3\), and nothing special happens at the scale \(\mathrm{m}\) as far as the strong coupling is concerned.

  4. 4.

    Of course, as noted above, one should be cautious about the meaning of “graviton mass”, if \(\mathrm {c}_1\ne \mathrm {c}_2\) in (5.12), which one should anticipate to hold in the quantum theory. However, such a detuning of the Fierz-Pauli structure, as is well-known, does not spoil consistency of the effective theory if \(\mathrm {c}_{1,2}\ll 1\), which is true for the theory at hand.

References

  • Arkani-Hamed N, Georgi H, Schwartz MD (2003) Effective field theory for massive gravitons and gravity in theory space. Annals Phys 305:96–118. doi:10.1016/S0003-4916(03)00068-X

  • Babichev E, Deffayet C, Ziour R (2010) The recovery of general relativity in massive gravity via the vainshtein mechanism. Phys Rev D 82:104008. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.104008

  • Buchbinder IL, Pereira DD, Shapiro IL (2012) One-loop divergences in massive gravity theory. Phys Lett B 712:104–108. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.04.045

  • Chkareuli G, Pirtskhalava D (2012) Vainshtein mechanism In \(\Lambda _3\) - theories. Phys Lett B 713:99–103. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.05.030

  • de Rham C, Gabadadze G (2010) Generalization of the fierz-pauli action. Phys Rev D 82:044020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.044020

  • de Rham C, Gabadadze G, Heisenberg L, Pirtskhalava D (2012) Non-renormalization and naturalness in a class of scalar-tensor theories. Phys Rev D 87

    Google Scholar 

  • de Rham C, Gabadadze G, Tolley AJ (2011) Resummation of massive gravity. Phys Rev Lett 106:231101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.231101

  • ’t Hooft G (1980) Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking. NATO Adv Study Inst Ser B Phys 59:135

    Google Scholar 

  • ’t Hooft G, Veltman MJG (1974) One loop divergencies in the theory of gravitation. Annales Poincare Phys Theor A20:69–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyama K, Niz G, Tasinato G (2011a) Analytic solutions in non-linear massive gravity. Phys Rev Lett 107:131101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.131101

  • Koyama K, Niz G, Tasinato G (2011b) Strong interactions and exact solutions in non-linear massive gravity. Phys Rev D 84:064033. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.064033

  • Luty MA, Porrati M, Rattazzi R (2003) Strong interactions and stability in the DGP model. JHEP 0309:029

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolis A, Rattazzi R (2004) Classical and quantum consistency of the DGP model. JHEP 0406:059. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/06/059

  • Nicolis A, Rattazzi R, Trincherini E (2009) The Galileon as a local modification of gravity. Phys Rev D 79:064036. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.064036

  • Sbisa F, Niz G, Koyama K, Tasinato G (2012) Characterising vainshtein solutions in massive gravity. Phys Rev D 86:024033. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.024033

  • Vainshtein AI, Khriplovich IB (1971) On the zero-mass limit and renormalizability in the theory of massive yang-mills field. Yad Fiz 13:198–211

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lavinia Heisenberg .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heisenberg, L. (2015). Quantum Corrections: Natural Versus Non-natural. In: Theoretical and Observational Consistency of Massive Gravity. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18935-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics