Systematic Uncertainties

  • Boris LemmerEmail author
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)


No simulation including modelling of the underlying physics is expected to be perfect. Limited knowledge and simplified models cause systematic uncertainties, which affect the precision of the measurement. This concerns both the physics processes under study as well as the modelling of the detector.


Systematic Uncertainty Parton Showering Spin Correlation Colour Reconnection Final State Radiation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    ATLAS Collaboration, Jet energy measurement and its systematic uncertainty in proton-proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s}=7\) TeV with the ATLAS detector. arXiv:1406.0076[hep-ex]. Submitted to EPJ C
  2. 2.
    UA2 Collaboration, Measurement of jet production properties at the CERN anti-p p Collider. Phys. Lett. B144, 283 (1984). doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(84)91822-7
  3. 3.
    ATLAS Collaboration, Jet energy resolution in proton-proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s}=7\) TeV recorded in 2010 with the ATLAS detector. Eur. Phys. J. C73, 2306 (2013). doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2306-0
  4. 4.
    ATLAS Collaboration, Jet energy resolution and selection efficiency relative to track jets from in-situ techniques with the ATLAS detector using proton-proton collisions at a center of mass energy \(\sqrt{s}\) = 7 TeV, ATLAS-CONF-2010-054Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.M. Campbell, J. Huston, W. Stirling, Hard interactions of quarks and gluons: a primer for LHC Physics. Rept. Prog. Phys. 70, 89 (2007). doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/70/1/R02
  6. 6.
    ATLAS Collaboration, Improved Luminosity Determination in \(\mathbf{pp}\) Collisions at \(\mathbf{\sqrt{s} = 7}\) TeV using the ATLAS Detector at the LHC, ATLAS-CONF-2012-080Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurements of top quark pair relative differential cross-sections with ATLAS in \(pp\) collisions at \(\sqrt{s}=7\) TeV. Eur. Phys. J. C73, 2261 (2013). doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2261-1
  8. 8.
    F.A. Berends et al., On the production of a W and jets at hadron colliders. Nucl. Phys. B357, 32 (1991). doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(91)90458-A
  9. 9.
    N. Kidonakis, Next-to-next-to-leading-order collinear and soft gluon corrections for t-channel single top quark production. Phys. Rev. D83, 091503 (2011). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.091503
  10. 10.
    N. Kidonakis, NNLL resummation for s-channel single top quark production. Phys. Rev. D81, 054028 (2010). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.054028
  11. 11.
    N. Kidonakis, Two-loop soft anomalous dimensions for single top quark associated production with a \(W^{-}\) or \(H^{-}\). Phys. Rev. D82, 054018 (2010). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.054018
  12. 12.
    H.-L. Lai et al., New parton distributions for collider physics. Phys. Rev. D82, 074024 (2010). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.074024
  13. 13.
    J. Gao et al., The CT10 NNLO global analysis of QCD. Phys. Rev. D89, 033009 (2014). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.033009
  14. 14.
    M. Whalley, D. Bourilkov, R. Group, The Les Houches accord PDFs (LHAPDF) and LHAGLUE, arXiv:hep-ph/0508110[hep-ph]
  15. 15.
    A. Martin et al., Parton distributions for the LHC Eur. Phys. J. C63, 189 (2009). doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1072-5
  16. 16.
    A. Martin et al., Uncertainties on \(\alpha _{S}\) in global PDF analyses and implications for predicted hadronic cross sections. Eur. Phys. J. C64, 653 (2009). doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1164-2
  17. 17.
    R.D. Ball et al., A first unbiased global NLO determination of parton distributions and their uncertainties. Nucl. Phys. B838, 136 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.05.008
  18. 18.
    ATLAS Collaboration, CDF Collaboration, CMS Collaboration, D0 Collaboration, First combination of Tevatron and LHC measurements of the top-quark mass, ATLAS-CONF-2014-008, CDF-NOTE-11071, CMS-PAS-TOP-13-014, D0-NOTE-6416, arXiv:1403.4427[hep-ex]
  19. 19.
    ATLAS Collaboration, Combination of ATLAS and CMS results on the mass of the top-quark using up to 4.9 fb\(^{-1}\) of \(\sqrt{s}=7\) TeV LHC data, ATLAS-CONF-2013-102Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. Mahlon, S.J. Parke, Angular correlations in top quark pair production and decay at hadron colliders. Phys. Rev. D53, 4886 (1996). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.53.4886
  21. 21.
    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of top-quark pair differential cross-sections in the \(l\)+jets channel in \(pp\) collisions at \(\sqrt{s}=7\) TeV using the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2013-099Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurements of spin correlation in top-antitop quark events from proton-proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s}=7\) TeV using the ATLAS detector. Phys. Rev. D90(11), 112016 (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. Gallicchio, M.D. Schwartz, Seeing in color: jet superstructure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 022001 (2010). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.022001
  24. 24.
    P.Z. Skands, Tuning Monte Carlo generators: the perugia tunes. Phys. Rev. D82, 074018 (2010). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.074018
  25. 25.
    T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, P.Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual. JHEP 0605, 026 (2006). doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/026
  26. 26.
    G. Corcella et al., HERWIG 6: an event generator for hadron emission reactions with interfering gluons (including supersymmetric processes). JHEP 0101, 010 (2001). doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/01/010
  27. 27.
    S. Jadach, J.H. Kühn, Z. Was, TAUOLA: a library of Monte Carlo programs to simulate decays of polarized tau leptons. Comput. Phys. Commun. 64, 275 (1990). doi: 10.1016/0010-4655(91)90038-M
  28. 28.
    W. Bernreuther, A. Brandenburg, Z. Si, P. Uwer, Top quark pair production and decay at hadron colliders. Nucl. Phys. B690, 81 (2004). doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.04.019

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.II. Physikalisches InstitutGeorg-August-Universität GöttingenGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations