Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Undercount of Young Children in the U.S. Decennial Census

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Population Studies ((BRIEFSPOPULAT))

  • 228 Accesses

Abstract

The issue of census undercounts in the U.S. Census is introduced and background information on the issue of census accuracy is provided. An overview of the contents of the book is provided along with a description of the intended audiences. Uses of census data are discussed to provide readers with a sense of the importance of Census undercounts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, M., & Fienberg, S. E. (2001). Who counts? The politics of census taking in contemporary America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. A. (2004). Undercount in China’s 2000 census in comparative perspective. PSC Research Report, No. 04-565, Population Studies Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. A., & Silver, B. D. (1985). Estimating census undercount from school. Demography, 22(2), 289–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balinski, M., & Young, H. P. (1982). Fair representation: Meeting the ideal of one man, one vote. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumerman, L. M., & Vidal, P. M. (2009). Uses of population and income statistics in federal funds distribution–with a focus on census bureau data. Government Divisions Report Series, Research Report #2009-1, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, B. E., & Dunn, W. (1995). Moving power and money: The politics of U.S. census taking. Ithaca NY: New Strategists Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brick, J. M., & Williams, D. (2012). Explaining rising nonresponse rates in cross-sectional surveys. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 645, 36–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choldin, H. M. (1994). Looking for the last percent: The controversy over census undercounts. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C. C., Massaglie, M. P., & Eliason, S. R. (1989). Population undercount and social science research. Social Indicators Research, 21(6), 559–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conk, M. (1987). According to their respective numbers. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, R. (2011). House apportionment 2010: States gaining, losing and on the margin. Congressional Research Service, 7-5700 R41584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daponte, B. O., & Wolfson, L. J. (2003). How many American children are poor? Considering census undercounts by comparing census to administrative data. Unpublished paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darga, K. (1999). Sampling and the census. Washington DC: AEI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonton, B. (2001). Effects of U.S. census undercoverage on analyses of school enrollments: A case study of Portland public schools. U.S. Census Monitoring Board, Report Series, Report No. 5, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, R. E., Passel, J. S., Robinson, J. G., & with Assistance from Cowan, C. D. (1988). The coverage of the population in the 1980 census. U.S. Census of Population and Housing, Evaluation and Research Reports, PHC80-E4, U.S Census Bureau, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • First Focus. (2014). Children’s budget: 2014. Washington, DC: First Focus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodkind, D. (2011). Child underreporting, fertility and sex ratio imbalance in China. Demography, 48, 291–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D. H. (2014). Final task force report: Task force on the undercount of young children. Washington, DC: Memorandum for Frank A. Vitrano, U.S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grofman, B. (1982). Representation and redistricting issues. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, R. (2010). Children count too! Census bureau’s directors blog March 9. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, R. M., & Couper, M. P. (1998). Nonresponse in household interview surveys. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, D., & Denton, N. (2001). Census affects children in poverty. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Monitoring Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillygus, D. S., Prewitt, K., & Pals, H. (2006). The hard count: The political and social challenges of census mobilization. New York: The Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krogstad, J. M. (2014). U.S. census looking at big changes in how it asks about race and ethnicity. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibler, C. A., Rastogi, S., Fernandez, L. E., Noon, J. M., & Ennis, S. R. (2014). America’s churning races: Race and ethnic response changes between census 2000 and the 2010 Census, CARRA working paper series, working paper #2014-09. Center for Administrative Records Research and Applications. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E. (2007). Strength of attachment: survey coverage of people with tenuous ties to residences. Demography, 44(2), 437–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, R. (1965). Reapportionment: The law and politics of equal representation. New York, NY: The Twentieth Century Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, S. L., Xu, J., & Kochanek, K. D. (2013). Deaths: Final data for 2010. National Vital Statistics Reports, National Center for Health Statistics, 61(4), 1–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hare, W. P. (1999). The overlooked undercount: Children missed in the U.S. decennial census. KIDS COUNT Working Paper, The Annie. E. Casey Foundation, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hare, W. P. (2009). Why Are Young Children Missed So Often in the Census. KIDS COUNT Working Paper, The Annie E. Casey Foundation, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hare, W. P., Jensen, E., & O’Hare, B. C. (2013). Assessing the undercount of young children in the U.S. decennial census: Implications for survey research and potential explanations. Paper presented at the 2013 American Association of Public Opinion Researchers Annual Conference, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hare, W. P. (2014a). Assessing net coverage error for young children in the 2010 U.S. decennial census. Center for Survey Measurement Study Series (Survey Methodology #2014-02). U.S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hare, W. P. (2014b). Historical examination of net coverage error for children in the U.S. decennial census: 1950 to 2010. Center for Survey Measurement Study Series (Survey Methodology #2014-03). U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hare, W. P. (2014c). Assessing net coverage for young children in the 2010 U.S. decennial census. International Journal of Population Research, 2014, doi:10.1155/2014/671715.

  • O’Hare, W. P., & Jensen, E. B. (2014). The representation of young children in the American community survey. Presentation at the ACS Users Group Conference, Washington, DC. May 29–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, J., & Park, J. (2005). The gap between births and U.S. census counts of children born in California: Undercount or transnational movement? Paper presented at the Population Association of America Conference, Philadelphia PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prewitt, K. (2003). Politics and science in census taking. The American People: Census 2000, Russell Sage Foundation and Population Reference Bureau. Population Reference Bureau, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prewitt, K. (2014). What is your race? The census and our flawed efforts to classify Americans. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • PriceWaterhouseCooper. (2001). Effect of U.S. decennial census 2000 undercount on federal funding to states and selected counties, 2001–2012. Report to the U.S. Census Monitoring Board, Presidential Members.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reamer, A. D. (2010). Counting for dollars. Brookings Institute, Metropolitan Policy Program, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G. J., Bashir, A., Das Dupta, P., & Woodward, K. A. (1993). Estimates of population coverage in the 1990 United States U.S. census based on demographic analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88(423), 1061–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G. J., & Adlaka, A. (2002). Comparison of A.C.E. Revision II Results with Demographic Analysis. DSSD A.C.E. Revision II Estimates Memorandum Series #PP-41, December 31, 2002, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. G. (2010). Coverage of population in census 2000 based on demographic analysis: The history behind the numbers. Population Division Working Paper N0. 91, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skerry, P. (2000). Counting on the census?. Washington DC.: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S., Tayman, J., & Swanson, D. A. (2001). State and local population projections: Methods and analysis. Kluwer: The Plenum Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Leadership Conference Education Fund/Advancing Justice/National Association of Latino Elected Officials (2014). Race and ethnicity in the 2020 census: Improving data to capture a multiethnic America. Leadership Conference Education Fund, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Senate. (1992). Dividing dollars: Issues in adjusting decennial counts and intercensal estimates for funds distribution. Report prepared by the Subcommittee on Government Information and Regulation of the Committee on Government Affairs, 102nd Congress, 2nd session Senate Print 102–83, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (1944). Population differential fertility: 1940 and 1910; standardized fertility rates and reproduction rates. Appendix A, Completeness of Enumeration of Children Under 5 Years Old in the U.S. Census of 1940 and 1910, 1940 Census, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (1974). Estimates of coverage of population by sex, race and age: demographic analysis, 1970 U.S. Census of Population and Housing, Evaluation and Research Program, PHC (E)-4, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). 2010 Census coverage measurement estimation. Report: Summary of Estimates of Coverage for Persons in the United States, DSSD 2010 Census Coverage Measurement Memorandum Series #2010-G-01, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2013). 2010 Census race and hispanic origin alternative questionnaire experiment. 2010 Census Planning Memorandum Series, No. 211 (2nd reissue), U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2014a). The 2013 population estimates. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2014b). U.S. population projections: 2014–2060. Release Number CB14-TPS.86, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velkoff, V. (2011). Demographic evaluation of the 2010 census. Paper presented at the 2011 population association of America annual conference, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service. (2013). Projections for the 50 States and D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, K. K., & Fein, D. J. (1990). U.S. Census undercount: An historical and contemporary sociological issues. Sociological Inquiry, 60(2), 127–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, K., & Robinson, J. G. (1999). What do we know about the undercount or children? Population Division Working Paper, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. O’Hare Data and Demographic Services LLC, Ellicott City, MD, USA

    William P. O’Hare

Authors
  1. William P. O’Hare
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William P. O’Hare .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Hare, W.P. (2015). Introduction. In: The Undercount of Young Children in the U.S. Decennial Census. SpringerBriefs in Population Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18917-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation