Advertisement

Efficiency of Private Pension Companies in Turkey Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)

  • Abdu Seid AliEmail author
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)

Abstract

This paper tries to examine the efficiency of private pension companies in Turkey using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) covering the year 2008–2012. Total stockholders’ equity and operating expenses of the pension companies have been taken as input variables whereas investment income and fund administration charges were considered as output variables. The findings imply that there are technical efficiency gains in some private pension companies in Turkey. Though there is no continuous trend towards an improvement in technical efficiency, important changes over time have been witnessed. This may be due to the immaturity of the private pension industry given that it has launched operations 10 years ago. Note ought to be taken that management of the private pension scheme is a complex undertaking and in some instances, really chaotic. This is premised on the fact that some end up missing out on the true value of the scheme and that they even lose trust of the same. This paper thus explores the efficiency imbedded within private pension companies using Data Envelopment Analysis.

Keywords

Private pension companies Technical efficiency Data envelopment analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17:99–120Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barrientos A, Boussofiane A (2005) How efficient are pension funds managers in Chile? Revista de Economia Contemporânea 9(2):289–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barros CP, Garcia MTM (2007) Analyzing the performance of pension funds industry with a stochastic cost frontier: a Portuguese case study. Geneva Pap Insur Theory Pract 32:190–210, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barros C, Pestan FG, Romero C (2008) Technical efficiency and heterogeneity of Argentina pension funds. Working papers, Technical University of Lisbon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Caves R, Porter ME (1977) From entry barriers to mobility barriers: conjectural decisions and contrived deterrence to new competition. Q J Econ 91:241–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Central Bank of Turkey (2011) Financial stability report. Central bank of Turkey, Turkey. http://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/tcmb+en/tcmb+en/main+menu/publications/reports/financial+stability+report
  7. 7.
    Chansarn S (2005) Efficiency in Thai financial sector after the financial crisis. University Library of Munich, Munich, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Charnes A, Cooper W, Rhodes GE (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coelli TJ, Rao DSP, O’Donnell CJ, Battese GE (2005) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dalkılıç N, Ada AA (2014) Efficiencies of life/pension insurance industry in Turkey: an application of data envelopment analysis. J App Finance Bank 4(1):181–191Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davis PE (2005) The role of pension funds as institutional investors in emerging markets. Brunel University and NIESR, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc Ser A 120:253–290. G TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    KPMG Turkey (2013) Turkish pension system amendments. Yetkin Yeminli Mali Müşavirlik A.Ş, Istanbul-Turkey. http://www.kpmgvergi.com/PDF/Yayinlar/KPMG-Global-Yayinlar/Turkish-Pension-System-Amendments.pdf
  14. 14.
    Kurtaran A, Karakaya A, Dağlı H (2013) Improvement of private pension system in Turkey and measurement of its efficiency with DEA. Int J Econ Finance 5(11):163–173Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Musalem AR, Pasquini R (2012) Private pension systems: cross-country investment performance. Working paper, Social protection and labor world Bank, No. 1214Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Njuguna AG, Arnold C (2010) Improving the financial efficiency of pension funds in Kenya. Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port ElizabethGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Olgaç K (2006) Private Pension System of Turkey, discussion on the development of Private Pension System of Turkey. OECD/IOPS Global Forum on Private Pensions, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2013) Pension markets in focus. OECD, Paris, France. http://www.oecd.org/pensions/PensionMarketsInFocus2013.pdf
  19. 19.
    Özgür Ö, Yalçın C (2013) The effect of private pension reforms on domestic saving rates in developing countries: cross-country empirical evidence. CBT research notes in economics. Central Bank of Turkey, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Porter ME (1979) The structure within industries and companies’ performance. Rev Econ Stat 61:214–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rumelt R (1991) How much does industry matter? Strateg Manag J 12(2):167–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ruzgar B, Akkaya A (2009) Examining efficiencies of private pension companies in Turkey with data envelopment analysis. In: IWW2009-proceeding of the IVth international workshop on applications of wavelets to real world problems, At Kocaeli, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 5(2):171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lecturer at Wolaita Sodo UniversityWolaita SodoEthiopia
  2. 2.PhD candidate, Department of Business AdministrationMarmara UniversityBahçelievler/IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations