Advertisement

A Comparative Analysis of Sukuk and Conventional Bonds

  • Abdurahman Jemal YesufEmail author
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)

Abstract

Sukuk and bonds are two kinds of financial instruments; despite their differences, they share similar responsibility of fund mobilizing from surplus (spending) units to shortage units. Sukuk can resemble conventional bonds by some of its features, but it is technically neither debt nor equity. It is complex to understand the exact nature of Sukuk and differentiating them from bonds. Conventional bonds are structured on the basis of debt whereas sukuk are basically investment certificates consisting of ownership claims in a pool of assets. Thus, claim embodied in sukuk is not simply a claim to cash flow but also an ownership claim. Although there are various fundamental differences between the sukuk and conventional bonds, both instruments try to solve the same common financial problem of raising capital for needed entities. They offer solutions in different ways to the same financial problem. Therefore, in this chapter an attempt is made to raise the awareness and knowledge base of those who have had little or no exposure to the Islamic financial instrument, such as sukuk, its complex nature and functions in today’s global financial market. The chapter has compared sukuk instruments with conventional bonds based on the basic fundamental variables such as risks, return, and correlation variables. It has also shown the risk diversification potential of sukuk in a portfolio.

Keywords

Sukuk Bond Return Risk Portolio Diversification 

JEL Classification

F30 G10 G11 G29 

References

  1. 1.
    Sundararajan V, Marston D, Shabsigh G (1998) Monetary operations and government debt management under Islamic banking. IMF working paper, WP/98/144, Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wilson R (2012) Legal, regulatory and governance issues in Islamic finance. Edinburgh guides to Islamic finance, A series edition. Edinburgh University Press Ltd, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bakar MD, Alhabshi SM (n.d.) An introduction to Islamic finance. Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA), LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bodie K, Marcus (2004) Investments, 6th edn. The McGraw−Hill Companies Inc, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hans V (2009) Islamic finance, principles and practice. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Christopher FRICHARDSON (2006) Islamic finance opportunities in the oil and gas sector: an introduction to an emerging field. Tex Int Law J 42(119):122–154Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thomas A, Cox S, Kraty B (2005) Structuring Islamic finance transactions. Euromoney Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jobst A, Kunzel P, Mills P, Sy A (2008) Islamic bond issuance – what sovereign bond managers need to know. IMF policy discussion paper, Monetary and Capital Markets Department (MCM), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wilson R (2004) Overview of the sukuk market Islamic bonds: Your guide to issuing, structuring and investing in sukuk. Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC, London/England, pp 3–17Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhamal KN (2010) How risky Sukuk are: comparative analysis of risks associated with Sukuk and conventional bonds. Dissertation paper, the British University in DubaiGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tahmoures A, Afshar A (2013) Compare and contrast Sukuk (Islamic bonds) with conventional bonds, are they compatible? J Global Bus Manag 9(1):44–52Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tariq AA (2004) Managing financial risks of Sukuk structures. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science at Loughborough University, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tariq AA, Dar H (2007) Risks of Sukuks: implications for resource mobilization. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev 49(2):203–223. March–April 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Usmani MT (2008) Sukuk and their contemporary applications. AAOIFI Shariah Council, BahrainGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI) (2008) Sukuk Shariah standards. Available at: www.aaoifi.com
  16. 16.
    Goldman (2012) Sukuk induces ownership and liquidity risks. Posted at: http://businessislamica.com/2012/03/13/goldmanssukuk-induces-ownership-and liquid risks
  17. 17.
    Khalil A (2011) Sukuk: definition, structure and accounting issues. MPRA paper no. 33675, posted 25, September 2011 13:19 UTCGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Robert S (2012) Emerging market debt: look further afield for yield. J.P. Morgan Asset Management. European Bank and Business Centre 6, route de Treves L-2633 Senningerberg, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Research Ltd KFH (2014) Islamic finance outlook 2014. Kuwait Finance House Research Ltd, Kuala LumpurGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business AdministrationMarmara UniversityİstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations