Advertisement

Non-equilibrium Processes in the Psychological Adaptation of Developing Personality

  • Marina Vladimirovna GrigoryevaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)

Abstract

The history of psychology in its entirety is connected with the search and determination of its own scientific paradigm. Modern psychology possesses methodological means allowing efficient use of both nomothemic and ideographic approaches. However given the emergence of chaos and complexity concepts within every sphere of life, things cannot be the same as before and approaches, hitherto highly effective, leave a lot to be desired. In the recent years therefore, a new line of research, synergetic approach has been forming. Psychic new formations appearing in an individual psyche under the influence of a complicated and unstable reality, acquire multidimensionality and temporality of their functioning increases, new features appear integrating history of individual and society existence, actual state of this existence and focus on the future. A determiner of psychic reality evolution and search for new grounds are necessary for adequate description of psychic reality. One of the ways could be application of the diachronic approach in psychological research. The school environment example showed that the problem of adaptational capabilities of personality must be solved in accordance with the specific character of the preceding development of the personality. Adaptational capabilities of personality play a significant role in the process of his/her interaction with the environment, they are complex multi-dimensional systemic unity where interconnection of heterogeneous psychic phenomena and personal traits provides systemic new-formation; that is adaptational readiness of personality.

Keywords

Equilibrium processes Psychological adaptation Developing personality 

References

  1. 1.
    Ananev BG (2002) Human as an object of cognition. Piter, St. PetersburgGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barabanschikov VA (2005) Principle of systemacity in modern psychology: grounds, problems, development trends. In: Barabanschikov VA (ed) The idea of systemacity in modern psychology. RAN, Moscow, pp 9–47Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Ferdinand S (2004) Course in general linguistics. Editorial URSS, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grigoreva MV, Novoseltceva AA (2011) Socio-psychological characteristics middle-stage school students as internal factors of school adaptation. In: Adaptation of personality in modern world, vol 3. Science, Saratov, pp 50–63Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grigoreva MV (2007) Intellectual mechanisms of school students’ psychological adaptation to new educational conditions. Herald of Kostroma State University named after N.A. Nekrasov Sci Methodol J Ser Psychol Sci Acmeol Educ 1:62–65Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grigoreva MV (2008) Developing a conceptual model of interaction between personality and environment. World Psychol 1(53):93–100Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grigoreva MV (2009) Interaction as the category of modern psychology. In: Proceedings of Pedagogical Institute of Saratov State University n.a. N.G. Chernyshevsky Ser Psychol Pedagog 3–4:3–12Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grigoreva MV (2010) Emotional processes and states in the system of dynamic interactions of a school student and educational environment. Scientific notes of Pedagogical Institute of Saratov State University n. a. N.G. Chernyshevsky Ser Psychol Pedagog 3(11):8–13Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grigoreva MV (2010) Psychological structure and dynamics of interactions between educational environment and a student in the process of school adaptation. Educ Psychol 6:33–42Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grigoreva MV (2011) Basic conceptual provisions of school adaptation research. Vector of science of Tolyatti State University. Ser Pedagog Psychol 2: 63–66Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grigoreva MV (2012) The role of adaptive abilities of students in the process of interaction with the educational environment. In: Proceedings of Saratov University New series. Ser Acmeol Educ Educ Psychol 3:11–15Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grigoreva MV (2013) Diachronic approach to research of sociological and psychological adaptation of personality. In: Proceedings of Saratov University. New Ser Ser Philos Psychol Pedagog 1:54–58Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grigoreva MV, Shamionov RM (2009) Temporal relationships of subjective and personal manifestations in adaptation process. In: Proceedings of Volgograd State Pedagogical University. Ser Pedagog Sci 9(43):127–130Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grigoreva MV (1996) Adaptation of the fifth graders to new conditions of educational activities. In: Scientific and theoretical support of students’ professional training of a Pedagogical Institution, vol VIII. Science, Saratov, pp 57–60Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grigoreva MV (2008) School adaptation: mechanisms and factors under different educational conditions. Saratov State University, SaratovGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kondakov IM (2006) Paradigms “soul – body” and their methodology. Paper presented at the international conference on the history of psychology 4 Moscow meetings, RAN, Moscow, 26–29 JuneGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kuhn TS (1975) The structure of scientific. AST, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leontev AA (1990) L.S. Vygotskiy. Education, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leontev DA (ed) (2011) Personal potential: structure and diagnostics. Meaning, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lomov BF (1984) Methodological and theoretical problems of psychology. Science, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maklakov AG (2001) Personal adaptational potential: its mobilization and prediction in extreme conditions. Psychol J 1:16–24Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Obukhova LF (1981) Jean Piaget’s theory: pro and contra. MGU, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Prangishvily IV (2000) System approach and system-wide patterns. Sinteg, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Psychology and new ideals of scientific character (materials of «roundtable») (1993) Quest Philos 5:3–43Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Razumovsky OS Diachrony URL: http://www.chronos.msu.ru/TERMS/razumovsky_diakhronia.htm. (Referral date 3 September 2012)
  26. 26.
    Rybakov VA, Pokryshkin AL (2005) Are psychology and natural science paradigm compatible? Hang-glider, TomskGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sardzhveladze NI (1989) Personality and its interaction with social environment. Metsniereba, TbilisiGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shamionov RM (2010) Concerning some transformations of the structure of subjective well-being of a personality under different conditions of professional socialization. World Psychol 1:237–249Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tarasova LE (2011) Pedagogical tact in the process of students training quality. Innov Educ 1:29–46Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vagurin VA (2006) Synergetics of the modern society evolution. ComKniga, MoscowGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Educational Psychology and Psycho-diagnostics DepartmentSaratov State UniversitySaratovRussia

Personalised recommendations