Advertisement

Risk Society and Humanity

  • Rail M. ShamionovEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)

Abstract

Risk society is a society with nonlinear dynamics, where a person finds him/herself in a situation of constantly changing external conditions. This fact demands from a human being constant readiness for change, ability to make quick decisions, and evaluate potential risks and losses. That is why one of the major problems nowadays is that of psychology of a human being as a subject of social behavior under conditions of uncertainty, chaos, and dynamics. A special area of the study is the psychological image of a risking person and a risk-potential of his/her behavior, as well as determination of personal regulators of risk emergence and studying of the process of subjective risk evaluation. It is also dully argued by the paper that a situation of risk is that of chaos and complexity and a person who is at risk is equally chaotic and complex. Such a person may not even be able to understand themselves. A risk society equally is that where the normal balance has been lost and chaos can easily creep in. The paper thus explored humanity in the realm of a risk society while examining the possibility of dynamic balance thereof.

Keywords

Risk Humanity Dynamic balance Risk society Complexity Chaos 

References

  1. 1.
    Atkinson JW (1964) An introduction to motivation. Van Nostrand, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bandura A, Ozer EM (1990) Mechanisms governing empowerment effects: a self-efficacy analysis. J Pers Soc Psychol 58(3):472–486CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beck U (1992) Risk society. Toward a new modernity. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Breakwell GM (2007) The psychology of risk. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eysenck HJ (1990) Biological dimension of personality. In: Pesvin LA (ed) Handbook of personality: theory and research. Guilford, New York, pp 244–276Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eysenck SBG, Eysenck HJ (1978) Impulsiveness and venturesomeness: their position in a dimensional system of personality description. Psychol Rep 43:1247–1255CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Friedman M, Savage LJ (1948) The utility analysis of choices involving risk. J Polit Econ 4:279–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grachev GV (2004) Personality and society: information and psychological safety and psychological protection. Izdatel, VolgogradGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kornilova TV (2009) Uncertainty negotiation by the subject in the process of decision making. In: Zhuravlev AL, Znakov VV, Ryabikina ZI, Sergienko EA (eds) Subjective approach in psychology. Publishing house, Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, pp 325–339Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Krasilnikov IA (2006) Intrapersonal conflict and psychological adaptation. Publishing House of Saratov University, SaratovGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kudryavtseva NN, Smagin DA, Bondar NP (2011) Modeling fighting deprivation effect in mouse repeated aggression paradigm. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 35(6):1472–1478. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.10.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lavery B, Siegel AW, Cousins JH, Rubovits DS (1993) Adolescent risk-taking: an analysis of problem behaviors in problem children. J Exp Child Psychol 55:277–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McDaniels TL, Gregory RS, Fields D (1999) Democratizing risk management: successful public involvement in local water management decisions. Risk Anal 19(3):497–510Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nagy S, Nix CL (1989) Relations between preventative health behavior and hardiness. Psychol Rep 65:339–345CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Popov LM (1992) Psychology of self-activity: abstract of doctoral thesis in psychology. Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shamionov RM (2006) Subjective well-being and valuable and semantic formations of a person in his/her professional self-determination. Izvestiya Saratov Univ Ser Philos Psychol Pedagog 6(1–2):104–109Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shamionov RM (2008) Subjective well-being of personality: a psychological pattern and factors. Publishing House of Nauchnaya Kniga, SaratovGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shamionov RM (2009) Youth’s characteristics of value orientations in correlation with the representations about Russia and Russians values. Sociol Educ 4:39–49Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shamionov RM (2010a) The link “subjective” personal properties and envy. Izvestiya Saratov Univ Ser Philos Psychol Pedagog 10(4):93–98Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shamionov RM (2011) Envy in the socio-economic attitudes and the individual activity. Theor Exp Psychol 4(4):46–52Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shamionov RM (2012) Strategies of behavior interrelation subjective well-being representatives contact ethnic groups. Izvestiya Saratov Univ Ser Philos Psychol Pedagog 12(1):79–83Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shamionov RM (2010b) On some transformations of personality’s subjective well-being structure in different conditions of professional socialization. World Psychol 1:237–249Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shamionov RM (2013) Socialization of personality: systematic-diachronic approach. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya 6(27):8. http://psystudy.ru. Accessed 28 Feb 2014
  24. 24.
    Shamionov RM (2014) Envy, personality’s riskiness and methods for achieving of high economic status. Open J Soc Sci 2:110–113. doi: 10.4236/jss.2014.25022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shamionov RM, Grigoryeva MV, Usova NV (2013) The subjective well-being of Russian migrants in Spain and of foreigners in Russia. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 86:498–504. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.604 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shamionov RM, Klenova MA (2009) Value and motivation of risk in different generations. Herald Kostroma State Univ 15(3):63–67Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sherif M (1966) A contribution predicament. Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Houghton-Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Slovic P, Peters E (2006) Risk perception and affect. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 15(6):322–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tugusheva AR (2006) Special aspects of a socially successful person pattern in the view of the youth. Probl Soc Psychol Personal 3:87–93Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wiegman O, Gutteling JM (1995) Risk appraisal and risk communication: some empirical data from the Netherlands reviewed. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 16(1–2):227–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhuravlev AL (2010) What modernization in Russia should be like? Psychological newspaper: We and the World 10(170):1Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Znakov VV (2005) Psychology of a subject and psychology of human existence. In: Znakov VV, Ryabikina ZI (eds) Subject, personality and psychology of human existence. Publishing house, Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, pp 9–44Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social Psychology of Education and DevelopmentSaratov State UniversitySaratovRussia

Personalised recommendations