Advertisement

Females Complex Leading Roles in the Game of Thrones Through Semiotics

  • Mina AbbasiyannejadEmail author
  • Nadya Supian
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)

Abstract

Women in Game of Thrones, a fantasy book by George R.R. Martin, have leading roles in several ways. Despite being represented as being subordinated and dominated by men, they show that when it is necessary they are able to reverse roles and show their ability to lead and have the men follow them. The complexity of their roles is presented in many different ways – as mature women, as the young and even as children. In this paper, it is shown that power conflict is the most important conflict in the novel. The women are seen in commanding positions and who attempt to develop their power despite the chaotic circumstances. This paper looks at the positions of two women in the novel using semiotics to shed light on words used, their signs and connotations. Interpreting signs will enable us to understand the hidden layers of the text.

Keywords

Complexity Women Semiotics Leading positions 

References

  1. 1.
    Abbasiyannejad M, Talif R (2013) The cultural conflict in the Ian McEwan’s on Chesil Beach through semiotics. J Soc Sci Human Pertanika (JSSH) 21(4):1297–1308Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abbasiyannejad M, Talif R (2014) The exploration of political conflicts and personal relationships in Ian McEwan’s the innocent. SAGE Open 4(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adi IR (2012) Popularizing epic narrative in George Rr Martin’s a game of thrones. Journal Humaniora 24(3):303–314Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Atkins GD, Morrow L (1989) Contemporary literary theory. University of Massachusetts Press, AmherstGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chandler D (2007) Semiotics: the basics. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Culler J (2001) The pursuit of signs: semiotics, literature, deconstruction. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis RC, Schleifer R (1989) Contemporary literary criticism: literary and cultural studies. Longman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    de la Rey C (2005) Gender, women and leadership. Agenda 19(65):4–11Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gardner L (2014) Review of game of thrones. Int J Jungian Stud 6(2):171–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jones R (2012) A game of genders: comparing depictions of empowered women between a game of thrones novel and television series. J Stud Res 1(3):14–21ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martin GR (1996) A game of thrones. Harper voyager, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scholes R (1977) Toward a semiotics of literature. Crit Inq 4(1):105–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sebeok TA (2001) Signs: an introduction to semiotics. University of Toronto Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Creative IndustriesUniversiti Tunku Abdul RahmanPetaling JayaMalaysia
  2. 2.Faculty of Educational StudiesUniversiti Putra MalaysiaSeri KembanganMalaysia

Personalised recommendations