Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Operations Management ((BRIEFSOPERMAN))

  • 851 Accesses

Abstract

In previous section we represented agent’s perceived risk by a measure that reflects the dispersion of his revenue stream. Although the dispersion of possible outcomes has been widely used as the measure of risk (Pratt 1964; Rothschild and Stiglitz 1970; Stiglitz 1974; Levy 1992; Fukunaga and Huffman 2009; Lewis and Bajari 2014) it fails to capture observable behavior in risky settings. In this section we extend our principal-agent analysis to risk-seeking agent. We note that there is an ongoing evaluation of risk attitudes in an attempt to explain peoples’ behavior when faced with risky choices. For instance Prospect Theory claims to offer a better model that covers discrepancies observed elsewhere (Kahneman and Tversky 1979; Tversky and Kahneman 1992).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The subscript “cu” stands for “cubic” because (5.13) is the square of the solution to Eq. (A.2), which is a cubic equation that is introduced later in the proof for Lemma 5.15.

References

  • Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M., Heath, D.: Coherent measures of risk. Math. Financ. 9(3), 203–228 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, P., Dewatripont, M.: Contract Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Filiz-Ozbay, E., Guryan, J., Hyndman, K., Kearney, M.S., Ozbay, E.Y.: Do lottery payments induce savings behavior: evidence from the lab. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D., Tirole, J.: Moral hazard and renegotiation in agency contracts. Econom.: J. Econom. Soc. 58, 1279–1319 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukunaga, K., Huffman, W.E.: The role of risk and transaction costs in contract design: evidence from farmland lease contracts in us agriculture. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 91(1), 237–249 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S.J., Hart, O.D.: An analysis of the principal-agent problem. Econom.: J. Econom. Soc. 51, 7–45 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guesnerie, R., Laffont, J.-J.: A complete solution to a class of principal-agent problems with an application to the control of a self-managed firm. J. Public Econ. 25(3), 329–369 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., Raviv, A.: Some results on incentive contracts with applications to education and employment, health insurance, and law enforcement. Am. Econ. Rev. 68, 20–30 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölmstrom, B.: Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econ. 10, 74–91 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölmstrom, B., Milgrom, P.: Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econom.: J. Econom. Soc. 55, 303–328 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econom.: J. Econom. Soc. 47, 263–291 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S.-H., Cohen, M.A., Netessine, S., Veeraraghavan, S.: Contracting for infrequent restoration and recovery of mission-critical systems. Manag. Sci. 56(9), 1551–1567 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, H.: Stochastic dominance and expected utility: survey and analysis. Manag. Sci. 38(4), 555–593 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G., Bajari, P.: Moral hazard, incentive contracts, and risk: evidence from procurement. Rev. Econ. Stud. rdu002 81 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Luenberger, D.G.: Microeconomic Theory, vol. 486. McGraw-Hill, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G., Shapira, Z.: Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Manag. Sci. 33(11), 1404–1418 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskin, E., Tirole, J.: The principal-agent relationship with an informed principal: the case of private values. Econom.: J. Econom. Soc. 58, 379–409 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskin, E., Tirole, J.: The principal-agent relationship with an informed principal, ii: common values. Econom.: J. Econom. Soc. 60, 1–42 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R.B.: Mechanism design by an informed principal. Econom.: J. Econom. Soc. 51, 1767–1797 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J.W.: Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econom.: J. Econom. Soc. 32, 122–136 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S.A.: The economic theory of agency: the principal’s problem. Am. Econ. Rev. 63(2), 134–139 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S.M.: Introduction to Probability Models (2006). Access Online via Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M., Stiglitz, J.E.: Increasing risk: I. a definition. J. Econ. Theory 2(3), 225–243 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E.: Incentives and risk sharing in sharecropping. Rev. Econ. Stud. 41, 219–255 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E.: Equilibrium in product markets with imperfect information. Am. Econ. Rev. 69(2), 339–345 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertain. 5(4), 297–323 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zeng, S., Dror, M. (2016). Risk-Seeking Agent. In: Formulating Principal-Agent Service Contracts for a Revenue Generating Unit. SpringerBriefs in Operations Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18672-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics