Abstract
This chapter offers an overview of the field of Francophone research on learning through work and is intended as a platform for presenting a delineation of this field. More specifically, the chapter presents a range of research traditions that have secured important places within the French-speaking research community, as illustrated in the chapters collected in the book. This overview aims at explaining the disciplinary background underlying these traditions and identifying key premises and concepts and specific research and training methods that have emerged in that particular context. The chapter also attempts to illuminate the specific conceptions of learning these traditions are built on and have contributed to promote. To achieve that outcome, three research traditions are described, in relation to their historical and cultural backgrounds, key ideas and methodological focuses. The first of these three traditions comprises what is referred to as Francophone ergonomics and the epistemology of the so-called work analysis. The historical and disciplinary origins of emergence of the Francophone tradition of ergonomics are presented, along with its central concepts, contributions to methods and applications in the field of vocational and professional training. Second, a focus is placed on the tradition of language use in relation to work, training and learning. These issues have acquired considerable visibility within Francophone research and have developed into a specific research tradition. An overview of the main research topics that have emerged within this tradition and key contributions to vocational and professional training issues is presented below. The third tradition is that referring to learning in connection with specific organisational contexts. Here, the social dimensions of learning are foregrounded and contributions from Francophone researchers are illustrated, and their alignment with other research traditions, and particularly those widely disseminated in the Anglophone world. The final section of the chapter draws together a range of ideas which have emerged beyond and across these specific research traditions, and that can be seen as having played an influencing role on the ways questions related with learning through and for work have been addressed in the Francophone world.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Amalberti, R., de Montmollin, M., & Theureau, J. (Eds.). (1991). Modèles en analyse du travail. Bruxelles: Mardaga.
Antonacopoulou, E., & Chiva, R. (2007). The social complexity of organizational learning: The dynamics of learning and organizing. Management Learning, 38(3), 277–295.
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bailly, M.-C., Durand, M., Goudeaux, A., Horcik, Z., & Poizat, G. (2014). Analyse du travail et formation: une technologie innovante. Education Permanente, n°HS-6, 20–27.
Billett, S. (2006). Constituting the workplace curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(1), 31–48.
Billett, S. (2014). Mediating learning at work: Personal mediations of social and brute facts. In C. Harteis, A. Rausch, & J. Seifried (Eds.), Discourses on professional learning: On the boundary between learning and working (pp. 75–93). Dordrecht: Springer.
Bion, W. R. (1979). Aux sources de l’expérience. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Bisel, R. S., Messersmith, A. S., & Kelley, K. M. (2012). Supervisor-subordinate communication hierarchical mum effect meets organizational learning. Journal of Business Communication, 49(2), 128–147.
Borzeix, A., & Fraenkel, B. (Eds.). (2001). Langage et Travail, communication, cognition, action. Paris: CNRS Éditions.
Bourgeois, E., Allegra, J., & Mornata, C. (2015). Transmission and individuation in the workplace. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.
Boutet, J. (Ed.). (1995). Paroles au travail. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Boutet, J. (2001). La part langagière du travail: bilan et évolution. Langage et Societe, 98, 17–42.
Boutet, J. (2008). La vie verbale au travail: des manufactures aux centres d’appel. Toulouse: Editions Octarès.
Bronckart, J.-P., Bulea, E., & Fristalon, I. (2004). Les conditions d’émergence de l’agir dans le langage. Cahiers de linguistique française, 26, 345–369.
Brougère, G. (2015). Learning by participating: A theoretical configuration applied to French cooperative day care centres. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.
Brummans, B. H. J. M., Cooren, F., Robichaud, D., & Taylor, J. R. (2014). Approaches in research on the communicative constitution of organizations. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), Sage Handbook of organizational communication. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Burnay, N. (Ed.). (2011). Transmission, mémoire et reconnaissance. Fribourg: Presses Universitaires de Fribourg.
Burnay, N., & Klein, A. (Eds.). (2009). Figures contemporaines de la transmission. Namur: Presses Universitaires de Namur.
Bruner, J. S. (1983). Child’s talk: Learning to use language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cameron, D., et al. (1994). The Relationship between researcher and researched: Ethics, advocacy and empowerment. In D. Graddol, J. Maybin, & B. Steirer (Eds.), Researching language and literacy in social context (pp. 18–25). London: Open University.
Chaliès, S., Ria, L., Trohel, J., & Durand, M. (2004). Knowledge construction and articulation of courses of action by preservice teachers and cooperating teachers during post-lesson interviews. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 765–781.
Chaliès, S., Bertone, S., Flavier, E., & Durand, M. (2008). Effects of collaborative mentoring on the articulation of training and classroom situations: A case study in the French school system. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 550–563.
Chevallier, D. (Ed.). (1991). Savoir faire et pouvoir transmettre. Paris: Editions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.
Clark, K., & Holquist, M. (1984). Mikhail Bakhtin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Clegg, S. R., Kornberger, M., & Rhodes, C. (2005). Learning/becoming/organizing. Organization Science, 12(2), 147–167.
Clot, Y. (1999). La fonction psychologique du travail. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Clot, Y. (2005). L’autoconfrontation croisée en analyse du travail: l’apport de la théorie bakhtinienne du dialogue. In L. Filliettaz & J.-P. Bronckart (Eds.), L’analyse des actions et des discours en situation de travail. Concepts, méthodes et applications (pp. 37–55). Louvain-la-neuve: Peeters.
Clot, Y. (2009). Clinic of activity: The dialogue as instrument. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 286–302). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Clot, Y., & Faïta, D. (2000). Genres et styles en analyse du travail: Concepts et méthodes. Travailler, 4, 7–42.
Clot, Y., & Kostulski, K. (2011). Intervening for transforming: The horizon of action in the clinic of activity. Theory & Psychology, 21, 681–696.
Clot, Y., Faïta, D., Fernandez, D., & Scheller, L. (2001). Entretiens en autoconfrontation croisée: une méthode en clinique de l’activité. Education Permanente, 146, 17–25.
Daniellou, F. (Ed.). (1996). L’Ergonomie en quête de ses principes. Toulouse: Octarès.
Daniellou, F. (2005). The French-speaking ergonomists’ approach to work activity: Cross influences of field intervention and conceptual models. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 6, 409–427.
De Keyser, V. (1991). Work analysis in French language ergonomics: Origins and current research trends. Ergonomics, 34, 653–669.
De Keyser, V. (1992). Why field studies. In M. Helander & M. Nagamachi (Eds.), Design for manufacturability: A systems approach to concurrent engineering and ergonomics (pp. 305–316). London: Taylor & Francis.
De Montmollin, M. (1967). Les systèmes Hommes-Machines: Introduction à l’ergonomie. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
De Montmollin, M. (1974). L’analyse du travail : préalable à la formation. Paris: Armand Colin.
De Montmollin, M. (1981). Le taylorisme à visage humain. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
De Montmollin, M. (1984). Actualité du taylorisme. In M. de Montmollin & O. Pastré (Eds.), Le taylorisme (pp. 13–32). Paris: La découverte.
De Montmollin, M. (1991). Analysis and models of operators’ activities in complex natural life environments. In J. Rasmussen, H. B. Andersen, & N. O. Bernsen (Eds.), Human-computer interaction (pp. 95–112). London: Erlbaum.
Dejours, C. (2010). Le facteur humain. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Delannoy, C. (1997). La motivation. Désir de savoir, désir d’apprendre. Paris: Hachette.
Delbos, G., & Jorion, P. (1984). La transmission des savoirs. Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
Dewey, J. (1938). Logic. The theory of inquiry. New York: Holt.
Dolbeau, M. (2012). La mémoire du métier. Maréchal-ferrant : un passé retrouvé. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Durand, M. (2008). Un programme de recherche technologique en formation des adultes. Education & Didactique, 2, 69–93.
Durand, M. (2011). Self-constructed activity, work analysis, and occupational training: An approach to learning objects for adults. In P. Jarvis & M. Watts (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook on learning (pp. 37–45). London: Routledge.
Durand, M. (2013). Human activity, social practice and lifelong education: An introduction. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 32, 1–13.
Durand, M., & Poizat, G. (2015). An activity-centred approach to work analysis and the design of vocational training situations. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.
Elkjaer, B. (2004). Organizational learning the ‘third way’. Management Learning, 35(4), 419–434.
Erickson, F. (2004). Origins: A brief intellectual and technological history of the emergence of multimodal discourse analysis. In P. Levine & R. Scollon (Eds.), Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis (pp. 196–207). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Falzon, P. (Ed.). (2013). Ergonomie constructive. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Faverge, J.-M. (1954). Méthodes statistiques en psychologie appliquée. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Filliettaz, L. (2006). Asymétrie et prises de rôles. Le cas des réclamations dans les interactions de service. In M. Laforest & D. Vincent (Eds.), Les interactions asymétriques (pp. 89–112). Québec: Editions Nota bene.
Filliettaz, L. (2008). Compétences professionnelles et compétences langagières en situation de risque : La régulation langagière d’un « événement » en milieu industriel. Langage et Societe, 125, 11–34.
Filliettaz, L. (2012). Affording learning environments in workplace contexts: An interactional and multimodal perspective. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 32, 107–122.
Filliettaz, L., Durand, I., & Trébert, D. (2015). Learning through verbal interactions in the workplace: The role and place of guidance in vocational education and training. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.
Fraenkel, B. (2001). La résistible ascension de l’écrit au travail. In A. Borzeix & B. Fraenkel (Eds.), Langage et travail. Communication, cognition, action (pp. 113–142). Paris: CNRS.
Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D., & Odella, F. (1998). Toward a social understanding of How people learn in organizations: The notion of situated curriculum. Management Learning, 29(3), 273–297.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. Essays in face-to-face behavior. Chicago: Aldine Publishers.
Grosjean, M., & Lacoste, M. (1999). Communication et intelligence collective: le travail à l’hôpital. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Grosjean, M., & Mondada, L. (Eds.). (2004). La négociation au travail. Lyon: Presses universitaires de Lyon.
Grusenmeyer, C., & Trognon, A. (1997). Les mécanismes coopératifs en jeu dans les communications de travail: un cadre méthodologique. Le Travail humain, 60(1), 5–31.
Guérin, F., Laville, A., Daniellou, F., Duraffourg, J., & Kerguelen, A. (2007). Understanding and transforming work. The practice of ergonomics. Lyon: Anact Network Edition.
Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, C. (2010). Video in qualitative research. Analysing social interaction in everyday life. London: Sage.
Horcik, Z., & Durand, M. (2011). L’ergonomie de la formation par simulation: une démarche pilote de conception en formation d’infirmiers anesthésistes. Activités, 8, 173–188.
Horcik, Z., Savoldelli, G., Poizat, G., & Durand, M. (2014). A phenomenological approach to novice nurse anesthetists’ experience during simulation-based training sessions. Simulation in Healthcare, 9, 94–101.
Hymes, D. (1984). Vers la compétence de communication. Paris: Hatier-Credif.
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. Style in language, 350, 377.
Kaës, R. (2011). Désir de former, formation par le groupe et transmission des savoirs. In R. Kaës & C. Desvignes (Eds.), Le travail psychique de la formation (pp. 1–35). Paris: Dunod.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C., & Traverso, V. (Eds.). (2008). Les interactions en site commercial. Lyon: ENS Editions.
Kloetzer, L., Clot, Y., & Quillerou-Grivot, E. (2015). Stimulating dialogue at work: The activity clinic approach to learning and development. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.
Kostulski, K. (2011). Development of activity through reflection: The case of the public prosecutor’s lapsus linguae. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24, 191–210.
Kunégel, P. (2011). Les maîtres d’apprentissage. Analyse des pratiques tutorales en situation de travail. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Lacoste, M. (2001). Peut-on travailler sans communiquer ? In A. Borzeix & B. Fraenkel (Eds.), Langage et travail (pp. 21–53). Paris: CNRS.
Laforest, M., & Vincent, D. (Eds.). (2006). Les interactions asymétriques. Québec: Editions Nota bene.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laville A., Teiger C., & Duraffourg J. (1972). Conséquences du travail répétitif sous cadence sur la santé des travailleurs et les accidents. Rapport final, no 29, Collection du Laboratoire de Physiologie du Travail et d’Ergonomie du Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, Paris.
Leplat, J., & Hoc, J.-M. (1983). Tâche et activité dans l’analyse psychologique des situations. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 3, 49–63.
Lorino, P. (2015). Learning as transforming collective activity through dialogical inquiries. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.
Lorino, P., Tricard, B., & Clot, Y. (2011). Research methods for non-representational approaches to organizational complexity: The dialogical mediated inquiry. Organization Studies, 32, 769–801.
Matte, F., & Cooren, F. (2015). Learning as dialogue: An ‘on-the-go’ approach to dealing with organizational tensions. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala Publications.
Mayen, P. (2000). Interactions tutorales au travail et négociations formatives: Formes et dispositifs de la professionnalisation. Recherche et formation, 35, 59–73.
Mayen, P. (2002). Le rôle des autres dans le développement de l’expérience. Education permanente, 151, 87–107.
Mayen, P. (2012). Les situations professionnelles: un point de vue de didactique professionnelle. Phronesis, 1, 59–67.
Mayen, P. (2015). Vocational didactics: Work, learning and conceptualization. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.
Metz, B. (1960). Adaptation du travail à l’homme. Rapport général sur la Conférence internationale de Zurich (2–6 mars 1959), projet no 6/07 E. Paris: O.E.C.E.-Organisation Européenne de Coopération Économique.
Mollo, V., & Falzon, P. (2004). Auto- and allo-confrontation as tools for reflective activities. Applied Ergonomics, 35, 531–540.
Mondada, L. (2005). L’ordre interactionnel et l’ordre institutionnel comme des accomplissements pratiques des membres dans le temps. Médias et culture, 2, 85–119.
Mondada, L. (2006). La compétence comme dimension située et contingente, localement évaluée par les participants. Swiss Journal of Applied Linguistics, 84, 83–119.
Mourlhon-Dallies, F. (2008). Enseigner une langue à des fins professionnelles. Paris: Didier.
Murrell, K. F. H. (Ed.). (1959). Adaptation du travail à l’homme. Recherches américaines et européennes sur les conditions du travail dans l’industrie. Paris: Organisation Européenne de Coopération Economique.
Nizet, J., Van Dam, D., & Dejardin, M. (2009). Les limites de la transmission familiales chez les viticulteurs bio alsaciens. In N. Burnay & A. Klein (Eds.), Figures contemporaines de la transmission (pp. 347–358). Namur: Presses Universitaires de Namur.
Oddone, I., Re, A., & Briante, G. (2008). Esperienza operaia, coscienza di classe e psicologia del lavoro. Torino: Einaudi.
Ombredane, A., & Faverge, J.-M. (1955). L’analyse du travail. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Ouellet, S., & Vézina, N. (2015). Activity analysis and workplace training: An ergonomic perspective. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.
Pastré, P. (2007). La didactique professionnelle: origines, fondements, perspectives. Travail et Apprentissages, 1, 9–21.
Pastré, P. (2011). La didactique professionnelle. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Pastré, P., Mayen, P., & Vergnaud, G. (2006). La didactique professionnelle. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 154, 145–198.
Pavard, B. (1994). Systèmes coopératifs: de la modélisation à la conception. Toulouse: Octarès.
Pène, S., Borzeix, A., & Fraenkel, B. (Eds.). (2001). Le langage dans les organisations. Une nouvelle donne. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Pinsky, L. (1992). Concevoir pour l’action et la coopération. Berne: Peter Lang.
Pinsky, L., & Theureau, J. (1987). L’étude du cours d’action: Analyse du travail et conception ergonomique. Paris: CNAM.
Poizat, G. (2015). Learning through interaction with technological objects: From the individuality of the technical object to human individuation. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.
Poizat, G., & Durand, M. (2014). Un programme de recherche en ergonomie de formation: Illustration par le cas des techniciens en radiologie médicale. Actes du 49ème congrès international de la Société d’Ergonomie de Langue Française, La Rochelle, France.
Poizat, G., Salini, D., & Durand, M. (2013). Approche énactive de l’activité humaine, simplexité, et conception de formations professionnelles. Education Sciences & Society, 4, 97–112.
Rabardel, P. (1995). Les hommes et les technologies: une approche cognitive des instruments contemporains. Paris: Armand Colin.
Rabardel, P. (2005). Instrument, activité et développement du pouvoir d’agir. In P. Lorino & R. Teulier (Eds.), Entre connaissance et organisation : l’activité collective (pp. 251–265). Paris: La Découverte.
Rabardel, P., & Béguin, P. (2005). Instrument mediated activity: From subject development to anthropocentric design. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 6, 429–461.
Rabardel, P., & Pastré, P. (Eds.). (2005). Modèles du sujet pour la conception: dialectiques, activités, développement. Toulouse: Octarès.
Richard, F., & Wainrib, S. (2006). La subjectivation. Paris: Dunod.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Samurçay, R., & Pastré, P. (1995). La conceptualisation des situations de travail dans la formation des compétences. Éducation Permanente, 123, 13–31.
Samurçay, R., & Pastré, P. (Eds.). (2004). Recherches en didactique professionnelle. Toulouse: Octarès.
Savoyant, A. (1995). Guidage de l’activité et développement des compétences dans une entreprise d’insertion. Education permanente, 123, 91–99.
Schwartz, Y. (Ed.). (1998). Reconnaissances du travail. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Scollon, R. (2001). Mediated discourse: The nexus of practice. London: Routledge.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simon, H. A. (1965). Administrative behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, F. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper.
Teiger, C., & Lacomblez, M. (2013). (Se) former pour transformer le travail. Laval: Presses de l’Université de Laval.
Theureau, J. (2004a). Le cours d’action: Méthode élémentaire. Toulouse: Octarès.
Theureau, J. (2004b). L’hypothèse de la cognition (ou action) située et la tradition d’analyse du travail de l’ergonomie de langue française. Activités, 1, 11–25.
Theureau, J. (2010). Les entretiens d’autoconfrontation et de remise en situation par les traces matérielles et le programme de recherche « cours d’action ». Revue d’Anthropologie des Connaissances, 4, 287–322.
Todorov, T. (1984). Mikhail Bakhtin: The dialogical principle (Theory & history of literature). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Veillard, L. (2015). University-corporate partnerships for designing workplace curriculum: Alternance training course in tertiary education. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.
Vidal-Gomel, C., & Samurçay, R. (2002). Qualitative analyses of accidents and incidents to identify competencies. The electrical systems maintenance case. Safety Science, 40, 479–500.
Von Cranach, M., Kalbermatten, U., Indermühle, K., & Gugler, B. (1982). Goal directed action. London: Academic.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (2012). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. London: Psychology Press.
Wisner, A. (1983). Ergonomic or anthropotechnology: a limited or wide approach to working conditions in technology transfer. In Communication at the first international conference on ergonomics in developing countries, Lulea, Sweden.
Wisner, A. (1985). Quand voyagent les usines. Essai d’anthropologie. Paris: Syros.
Wisner, A. (1995a). Situated cognition and action: Implication for ergonomics work analysis and anthropotechnology. Ergonomics, 38, 1542–1583.
Wisner, A. (1995b). The irruption of new technologies: a new challenge for ergonomics and anthropotechnology. Journal of Human Ergology, 24, 45–55.
Wisner, A. (1997). Anthropotechnologie. Vers un monde industriel polycentrique. Toulouse: Octarès.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.
Zarifian, P. (2001). Objectif compétence. Paris: Editions Liaisons.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Filliettaz, L., Billett, S., Bourgeois, E., Durand, M., Poizat, G. (2015). Conceptualising and Connecting Francophone Perspectives on Learning Through and for Work. In: Filliettaz, L., Billett, S. (eds) Francophone Perspectives of Learning Through Work. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18669-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18669-6_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18668-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18669-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)