Skip to main content
  • 1102 Accesses

Abstract

How can regions use tacit knowledge for innovations? The regional know-how in the stakeholder networks and in consortia for innovative clusters is discussed based on sustainable innovations for the tourism mobility: transport means, arrangements and communication technologies. The stakeholder networks generated 73 sustainable innovations; out of these, 38 (52 %) were successful measured by 10-year activity after the start. Social organisations and small firms are successful innovators albeit the scale of operations is small. The network policy is cost-effective and affordable in all regions. The consortium development followed the EU policy on innovative clusters. This has generated 15 consortia with 65 small- and medium-size enterprises and many experts. Out of these, 6 consortia were arranged and 2 were acting after 10 years. The success rate of inventors has dropped, and this policy is more costly, but the operations are larger than in network policy, and the successful consortia covered costs of this policy. Sustainable innovtions for the regional development are generated when local tacit know-how is fostered. Scouting inventors, developing skills and support of the knowledge spillovers are promising tools for the regional economic development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aernoudt, R. (2008). Innovation policy and future policy, Belgian and Flanders experiences. Presentation at the Conference Facilitating Sustainable Innovations, Leeuwarden, June 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, S. (2002). Restructuring seaside tourism: The resort lifecycle. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(1), 25–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock-Kumish, T. L. (2006). Trust and antitrust in innovation investment communities, reconsidering moral sentiments. University of Oxford, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baidal, J. A. I. (2003). Regional development policies: An assessment of their evolution and effects on the Spanish tourist model. Tourism Management, 24(6), 655–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baptista, R., & Swann, P. (1998). Do firms in clusters innovate more? Research Policy, 27, 525–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekele, G. W., & Jackson, R. W. (2006). Theoretical perspectives on industry clusters. West Virginia University, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P., & Morgan, K. (2002). The associational economy, firms, regions, and innovation (1st ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, L., Forsyth, P., & Spur, R. (2004). Evaluating tourism’s economic effects: new and old approaches. Tourism Management, 25, 307–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU (2003). European Union Regional Policy, Competitiveness, Sustainable development and Cohesion in Europe; from Lisbon to Gothenburg, European Commission, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulin, J., Lera, F., Pintor, J. M., & Garcia, J. (2006). The outlook for renewable energy in Navarre. Energy Policy, 34, 2201–2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2005). The flight of the creative class (1st ed.). New York: HarperCollins Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georg, S., Ropke, I., & Jorgensen, U. (1992). Clean technology-innovation and environmental regulation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2, 533–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnoth, J., & Anwar, S. A. I. (2000). New Zealand bets on event tourism. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 41(4), 72–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, A. L., & Beeton, R. J. S. (2001). Sustainable tourism or maintainable tourism: Managing resources for more than average outcomes. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 9(3), 168–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatakenaka, S., Westness, P., Gjelsvik, M., & Lester, R. K. (2006). The Regional Dynamics of Innovation, A comparative case study of oil and gas industry development in Stavanger and Aberdeen. Conference paper, SPRU 40th Anniversary, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom, September 11–13, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hospers, G.-J. (2004). Regional economic change in Europe: A neo-Schumpeterian vision (1st ed.). Munster: Volkswirtschaft LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, C. (1997). Sustainable tourism as an adaptive paradigm. Annals of Tourism Research, 24(4), 850–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorna, R. J., & Faber, N. R. (2006). Sustainability: from environment and technology to people and organizations. In R. Jorna (Ed.), Sustainable Innovation (1st ed., pp. 28–41). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1988). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krozer, Y. (2010). Do Innovation Clusters Pay Off ? In M. J. Arentsen, W. van Rossum, & A. E. Steenge (Eds.), Governance of Innovation (1st ed., pp. 107–124). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krozer, Y., & Tijsma, S. (2005). Sustainable innovations: Using regional qualities for economic development. Conference of Regional Studies Association, November 24, London, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krozer, Y., van de Akker, F., Bijma, T., van der Schaaf, H., & Redzepovic, E. (2005). Sustainable innovation for tourism mobility. In 4th international symposium on tourism aspects, mobility and global–local connections, Eastbourne, 23–24 June 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, L. E. (2005). Community and landscape change in southeast Alaska. Landscape and Urban Planning, 72(1–3), 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laffitte, P. (2006). High level advisory group on clusters. The European Cluster Memorandum, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanza, A., Temple, P., & Urga, G. (2003). The implications of tourism specialisation in the long run: an econometric analysis for 13 OECD economies. Tourism Management, 24, 315–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, C., & Lorenz, E. (1998). Collective learning, tacit knowledge and regional innovative capacity. Regional Studies, 33(4), 305–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malecki, E. J. (1991). Technology and economic development (1st ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2002). The elusive concept of localization economies: towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering. Environment and Planning A, 34(3), 429–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marelli, E. (2004). Evolution of Employment structure and regional specialisation in EU. Economic Systems, 28, 35–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2003). Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea? Journal of Economic Geography, 3, 5–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P., Mayer, T., & Mayneris, F. (2008). Spatial concentration and firm-level productivity in France. Paris: Centre for Economic Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsui, I. (2003). Industrial cluster policies and regional development in the age of globalisation, Eastern and Western approaches and their differences. Singapore: ISBC, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, R., Paci, R., & Usai, S. (2005). Geographical and sectoral clusters of innovation in Europe. Annals of Regional Science, 39(4), 715–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niosi, J., & Zhegu, M. (2005). Aerospace clusters: global or local spillovers? Industry and Innovation, 12(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papatheodorou, A. (2004). Exploring the evolution of tourism resorts. Annals of Tourism Research, 31(1), 219–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1992). Concurrentievoordeel (Competitive Advantage). Amsterdam/Antwerpen: L.J.Veen Uitgeverij.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition and economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, A. A. (2002). Creating smart systems: A guide to cluster strategies in less favoured regions, European Union-regional innovation strategies. Regional Technology Strategies, Carrboro, North Caroline, USA, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. (1998). Regions and the World, Economy (1st ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telfer, D. J., & Wall, G. (1996). Linkage between tourism and food production. Annals of Tourism Research, 23(3), 635–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnock, D. (2002). Ecoregion-based conservation in the Carpathians and the land-use implications. Land Use Policy, 19(1), 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, D. B. (2005). Comprehensive and minimalist dimensions of ecotourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(2), 439–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, W. (2008, March). Can regional clusters be engineered. Ingenia (34), 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix

Appendix

Granted project ideas for sustainable innovations in tourism during 2001–2003; those in bold are still active. The non-governmental organisations are indicated as ‘NGO’ in the table below.

Table 1 Sustainable innovations in tourism transport
Table 2 Sustainable innovations in tourism arrangements
Table 3 Sustainable innovations in tourism communication

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krozer, Y. (2016). Tacit Inventors in Regions. In: Theory and Practices on Innovating for Sustainable Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18636-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics